Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2018, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Crook County, Hellinois
5,820 posts, read 3,870,206 times
Reputation: 8123

Advertisements

I've been perusing slow-cooker recipes, many of which require cooking the food for 6 to 8 hours. I own a slow-cooker, but haven't used it in months. (Last time I did, I was home, cleaning, while the slow-cooker cooked my chicken chili.) I've heard of people starting their slow-cooker in the morning, then letting run until evening, while they go to work or on a day trip. Then, when they come back, their dinner is ready.

This sounds easy and convenient on paper, but I have a lot of reservations about running a heat-generating appliance while I'm not home. (After all, I'd never run my stove that way, even an electrical one.) Especially considering that oftentimes, the running slow-cooker sits on a wooden table or a kitchen counter. The most benign case I can think of is an electrical surge shutting off the slow-cooker, causing the food in it to go to waste. But what if it catches fire, for one reason or another? With me being gone all day, it could get pretty bad.

One method I have in mind, is placing the slow-cooker into an empty, dry kitchen sink. (My counters are laminate, so they're not fireproof.) This way, if the food spills out or something happens to the slow-cooker, it won't result in a destructive fire. (Just possible damage to the sink.) After all, the sink is stainless steel.

What does everyone else think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2018, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Nantahala National Forest, NC
27,074 posts, read 11,841,613 times
Reputation: 30347
I'm a little wary of leaving all day too, although many do so.

It's really no different than leaving a light on...so I imagine fires from slow cookers are rare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 09:53 AM
 
16,177 posts, read 32,481,285 times
Reputation: 20587
Mod Note: Moved from Food and Drink since this is about appliances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Eureka CA
9,519 posts, read 14,736,406 times
Reputation: 15068
What's "all day"? I've left them for eight hours, no problem. I probably wouldn't leave it unattended longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 10:11 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
we do 8-12 hours all the time .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 10:19 AM
 
Location: 49th parallel
4,605 posts, read 3,295,372 times
Reputation: 9588
Actually, I'd be a little wary of leaving it on while gone, too. It seems appliances used to be more reliable than they are now (or maybe we didn't worry as much back then) so I think you're right to worry.

A compromise would be to do the cooking overnight and refrigerate the meal until you get home from work the next day. I know some people on here would say, well, it could catch fire overnight, too, and then you'd be sleeping and the house would be burning down on top of you. So what's the answer? Either you trust the appliance to work while you're not watching it all the time, or you don't.

I do my slow cooker cooking at night and set the cooker on a metal tray, but your idea of the sink seems fine, too (if you don't have a slow leak in your faucet, haha)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
3,297 posts, read 3,021,473 times
Reputation: 12600
I know a lot of people leave their slow cookers unattended, but I've always been paranoid about that, so I only use it when I know I'm going to be home all day. (I have a friend whose husband is a fire chief, and she told me she would never leave hers unattended either.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Central IL
20,726 posts, read 16,352,228 times
Reputation: 50372
Maybe I'd be more concerned about a $15 crockpot but not a $75 InstaPot. And I don't leave mine sitting on "wood" or anything flammable but on top of my ceramic cooktop so there is nothing that close to catch on fire.

There could always be a freak accident but think....you leave outside lights on all night...flip your dishwasher to run before you run out the door...start a load of laundry the same way....the list goes on. I have to figure I have homeowners reason for a reason, and this is it.

I don't however run my dryer while I'm out - for some reason the odds of a lint fire seems higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Crook County, Hellinois
5,820 posts, read 3,870,206 times
Reputation: 8123
Quote:
Originally Posted by eureka1 View Post
What's "all day"? I've left them for eight hours, no problem. I probably wouldn't leave it unattended longer.
"All day" wasn't meant literally, i.e. 24 hours. It was meant the way most people use the term: from early morning until evening.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ndcairngorm View Post
A compromise would be to do the cooking overnight and refrigerate the meal until you get home from work the next day. I know some people on here would say, well, it could catch fire overnight, too, and then you'd be sleeping and the house would be burning down on top of you. So what's the answer? Either you trust the appliance to work while you're not watching it all the time, or you don't.

I do my slow cooker cooking at night and set the cooker on a metal tray, but your idea of the sink seems fine, too (if you don't have a slow leak in your faucet, haha)
I have a double sink. So I'd just turn the faucet to the vacant sink section.

I live in an apartment building, and it's hooked up to my suburb's municipal fire alarm system (per city ordinance). So if a fire were to start in my kitchen at night, it'd trip the alarm and wake up all my neighbors, and I'd have a small crowd of cranky, half-awake people in my building's parking lot. Like a school fire drill, basically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 11:56 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,832,630 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillennialUrbanist View Post
I've been perusing slow-cooker recipes, many of which require cooking the food for 6 to 8 hours. I own a slow-cooker, but haven't used it in months. (Last time I did, I was home, cleaning, while the slow-cooker cooked my chicken chili.) I've heard of people starting their slow-cooker in the morning, then letting run until evening, while they go to work or on a day trip. Then, when they come back, their dinner is ready.

This sounds easy and convenient on paper, but I have a lot of reservations about running a heat-generating appliance while I'm not home. (After all, I'd never run my stove that way, even an electrical one.) Especially considering that oftentimes, the running slow-cooker sits on a wooden table or a kitchen counter. The most benign case I can think of is an electrical surge shutting off the slow-cooker, causing the food in it to go to waste. But what if it catches fire, for one reason or another? With me being gone all day, it could get pretty bad.

One method I have in mind, is placing the slow-cooker into an empty, dry kitchen sink. (My counters are laminate, so they're not fireproof.) This way, if the food spills out or something happens to the slow-cooker, it won't result in a destructive fire. (Just possible damage to the sink.) After all, the sink is stainless steel.

What does everyone else think?
"This is US" dejavu ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top