Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-24-2013, 10:21 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hendersj31 View Post
Maybe we can start calling it the inner half loop?
I vote "the hipatropolis".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-24-2013, 10:28 AM
 
58 posts, read 101,447 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by hendersj31 View Post
Really? There is some very low cost living east of 45 and 288 that is unarguably trashy. Heck you could say it is straight up ghetto. You could get apartments there for 400 dollars including utilities sometimes. And get this....its inside the loop.
People need to realize there is a geographic area inside the loop that takes up about half of it that most people would not consider desirable. I seldom hear anyone on this forum recommend places like Denver harbor or the southeast side outside of perhaps a thread on gentrification. So the poster who said most of the area inside the loop is junky was not too far off in his claim. Don't get me wrong, I really like Houston and spent close to 20 years in the Heights so I am not bashing here.
Maybe we can start calling it the inner half loop?
$300s if you're on a feeder road.
And not all of the west half of the loop has cleaned up. There are still some pockets. But hey stay within a 2 sq mile bubble and it is out of sight, out of mind.
BTW the covert racism and agendas on this forum are so obvious its comical.

I can also find $1500-5000 rentals in Sugar land, Woodlands and Clear Lake all day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 10:59 AM
 
95 posts, read 169,964 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by hendersj31 View Post
Really? There is some very low cost living east of 45 and 288 that is unarguably trashy. Heck you could say it is straight up ghetto. You could get apartments there for 400 dollars including utilities sometimes. And get this....its inside the loop.
People need to realize there is a geographic area inside the loop that takes up about half of it that most people would not consider desirable. I seldom hear anyone on this forum recommend places like Denver harbor or the southeast side outside of perhaps a thread on gentrification. So the poster who said most of the area inside the loop is junky was not too far off in his claim. Don't get me wrong, I really like Houston and spent close to 20 years in the Heights so I am not bashing here.
Maybe we can start calling it the inner half loop?
When people refer to "inner loop" they mean the West side. Yes, most of the loop is trashy, but when posting about it in terms of real estate, we don't consider those areas. No one who posts on this forum will want to live there, and that's just how it is. It's why we can safely say "inner loop" because everyone will think of West U, River Oaks, Midtown, etc. Definitely non-trashy areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Baghdad by the Bay (San Francisco, California)
3,530 posts, read 5,136,325 times
Reputation: 3145
You could fit the entire city of San Francisco inside the Loop. Twice.

So, of course there are parts where no one goes. There are nice parts. There are ghettos. "Inside the Loop" is not a neighborhood, it's the size of a huge, diverse city. There will be some variance across such a large area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 12:44 PM
 
1,483 posts, read 1,726,103 times
Reputation: 2513
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojobeans2 View Post
When people refer to "inner loop" they mean the West side. Yes, most of the loop is trashy, but when posting about it in terms of real estate, we don't consider those areas. No one who posts on this forum will want to live there, and that's just how it is. It's why we can safely say "inner loop" because everyone will think of West U, River Oaks, Midtown, etc. Definitely non-trashy areas.
This isn't (or at least shouldn't be) the way we conceive of "inside the loop." There are lots of people who post here, and many different perspectives are represented. I consider the third ward, Eastwood, the Heights, etc... all significant areas inside the loop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 02:04 PM
 
95 posts, read 169,964 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerbear30 View Post
This isn't (or at least shouldn't be) the way we conceive of "inside the loop." There are lots of people who post here, and many different perspectives are represented. I consider the third ward, Eastwood, the Heights, etc... all significant areas inside the loop.
Well then to people who want to live there, they might not consider it trashy. It's all perspective.

Of course it shouldn't be how we think of "inside the loop" but that's the general language from Houstonians. I saw a survey recently about Houston demographics and they showed a map of "Houston inner loop" and only the left side was highlighted - which basically said that like 80% of survey participants considered that the meaning.

It does depend on age/demographics. University students (like I was) consider Third Ward and EaDo as part of the inner loop. George Bush Sr. (Galleria area) would probably not. A lot of these people who post here asking about where to buy their $600,000 house, I would not refer them to places like Third Ward. However, a student who wants to rent an apartment near school for less than $600/mo would be fine there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 02:41 PM
 
568 posts, read 901,601 times
Reputation: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojobeans2 View Post
Well then to people who want to live there, they might not consider it trashy. It's all perspective.

Of course it shouldn't be how we think of "inside the loop" but that's the general language from Houstonians. I saw a survey recently about Houston demographics and they showed a map of "Houston inner loop" and only the left side was highlighted - which basically said that like 80% of survey participants considered that the meaning.

It does depend on age/demographics. University students (like I was) consider Third Ward and EaDo as part of the inner loop. George Bush Sr. (Galleria area) would probably not. A lot of these people who post here asking about where to buy their $600,000 house, I would not refer them to places like Third Ward. However, a student who wants to rent an apartment near school for less than $600/mo would be fine there.
Coo story, bro. I saw a survey that showed only 7% of Americans knew who the first four presidents were. Also I would love to see that survey you saw.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 02:51 PM
 
95 posts, read 169,964 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by xsatyr View Post
Coo story, bro. I saw a survey that showed only 7% of Americans knew who the first four presidents were. Also I would love to see that survey you saw.
I wasn't talking about factual things like who the presidents were. This is a survey of how people think about their city. You can't get a question about "how you think" wrong, unless you can't comprehend how to be a human being with brain.

And I can see if I can find it. I was at an awesome event recently about how data visualization can help social change - Houston was one of the examples they used. They also showed how you can get your DNA visualized into charts/graphs and see and understand your whole ancestry, health risks, etc (but that's an unrelated topic)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 03:07 PM
 
568 posts, read 901,601 times
Reputation: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojobeans2 View Post
I wasn't talking about factual things like who the presidents were. This is a survey of how people think about their city. You can't get a question about "how you think" wrong, unless you can't comprehend how to be a human being with brain.

And I can see if I can find it. I was at an awesome event recently about how data visualization can help social change - Houston was one of the examples they used. They also showed how you can get your DNA visualized into charts/graphs and see and understand your whole ancestry, health risks, etc (but that's an unrelated topic)
The area inside the loop is factual. It's not subjective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2013, 05:40 PM
 
1,728 posts, read 3,550,583 times
Reputation: 1056


this one? lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top