Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2016, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,287 posts, read 7,491,861 times
Reputation: 5056

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
Not as bad as the Texas TBone that Perry and others were pushing. They hardly had anybody outside DFW and College Station on their board.

Basically Inner West Houston is nicer than Inner South Dallas and the downtown stretch ran into a lot of opposition. Plus it would be very expensive.
There are options, the existing track that runs into DT Houston now is rated for 80 mph. They could build the HSR track to the 290 location then just slow the train down for the remaining 5 miles into DT, at 80 mph that's a 4 minute leg which would not be significantly longer than the HSR would take considering that train would have to start slowing considerably sooner if it were going at high speeds.

This company is working to turn DFW into a HSR hub and Houston is only a means to an end in their thinking. The NW transit location is a lame duck when it comes to expanding HSR access into Houston its location is just too eccentric, and leaves few options to work with.

Saying this is better than another screw Houston plan is not a compelling argument in favor of this plan. If HSR is a viable alternative to air or other land based modes then somebody else will come up with a better plan eventually, that caters more to our local interest. lets not jump at the first couple of plans that are dangled before us by essentially the same people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2016, 02:22 PM
 
23,964 posts, read 15,059,733 times
Reputation: 12932
First couple of plans? For rail in Houston? This is the umpteenth one. Herb Keller was very good at shooting them down.

No reason why this won't work. No tax money involved, so no need to drag the approval out until the whole thing dies a slow death.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,287 posts, read 7,491,861 times
Reputation: 5056
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
First couple of plans? For rail in Houston? This is the umpteenth one. Herb Keller was very good at shooting them down.

No reason why this won't work. No tax money involved, so no need to drag the approval out until the whole thing dies a slow death.

If there are no tax dollars involved why are they so needy of public approval ? Somewhere along the line I think they do envision tax subsidies or perhaps even a bailout if necessary. No thank you.


If this is truly market driven then why even debate it ? They want people to fall in love with the concept so they will have a plan B.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Houston/Brenham
5,819 posts, read 7,227,327 times
Reputation: 12316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lance View Post
Actually I was a supporter of HSR until they decided to terminate the Houston end of the line at the Northwest transit center. This whole vision that TCP has is just a little too North Texas centric for my taste.
This I agree with. I think it's a significant problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lance View Post
If there are no tax dollars involved why are they so needy of public approval ? Somewhere along the line I think they do envision tax subsidies or perhaps even a bailout if necessary. No thank you.

If this is truly market driven then why even debate it ? They want people to fall in love with the concept so they will have a plan B.
They will need to use eminent domain, and they need public opinion on their side for that. Not to actually use it, but to keep there from being a groundswell of opposition against it.

But no tax dollars. I don't think once they start they will be able to reverse that course. Who wants to bail out an ongoing operation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 08:17 PM
 
15,397 posts, read 7,459,784 times
Reputation: 19333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lance View Post
There are options, the existing track that runs into DT Houston now is rated for 80 mph. They could build the HSR track to the 290 location then just slow the train down for the remaining 5 miles into DT, at 80 mph that's a 4 minute leg which would not be significantly longer than the HSR would take considering that train would have to start slowing considerably sooner if it were going at high speeds.
Which tracks are rated at 80mph? Certainly none of the ones that head out towards 290, which have a number of level crossings and curves. Besides, the freight lines will never allow HSR to run on their tracks - there's too much money to be made from freight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 10:36 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,287 posts, read 7,491,861 times
Reputation: 5056
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
Which tracks are rated at 80mph? Certainly none of the ones that head out towards 290, which have a number of level crossings and curves. Besides, the freight lines will never allow HSR to run on their tracks - there's too much money to be made from freight.
They are going to be using current RR right of way along most of 290 anyway.

Most mainline track, especially that owned by major railroads is Class 4 track. See link below for chart showing speed limits for various classes of railroad track.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_s...es#cite_note-9

The resistance they were getting going through the Washington Corridor area had more to do with the speed and noise that a HSR train would make and not the expense of it.

Even if they can't use existing class 4 track laying new class 4 track would still be more economical than new class 9 track or above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2016, 06:59 AM
 
100 posts, read 129,039 times
Reputation: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lance View Post
This company is working to turn DFW into a HSR hub and Houston is only a means to an end in their thinking. The NW transit location is a lame duck when it comes to expanding HSR access into Houston its location is just too eccentric, and leaves few options to work with.:

While I agree that this location is not optimal, saying it's "too eccentric" is over the top. Look at the park and ride shuttle options, and many proposals to build an east-west light rail line to the location.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2016, 07:25 AM
 
23,964 posts, read 15,059,733 times
Reputation: 12932
It was my understanding that all track for the HSR would be new and elevated in town.

Did the state of Texas declare no more grade crossings?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2016, 10:33 AM
 
1,011 posts, read 976,126 times
Reputation: 1557
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
It was my understanding that all track for the HSR would be new and elevated in town.

Did the state of Texas declare no more grade crossings?
That would be awesome. No more blowing of the horn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2016, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,287 posts, read 7,491,861 times
Reputation: 5056
Perhaps we should just let Amtrak provide HSR service in Texas..

While Amtrak is a perfectly fine way to travel, especially on the Eastern seaboard, the country's publicly owned rail company doesn't exactly have a high-tech reputation. That will change in the next few years, thanks to a massive $2.45 billion loan from the federal government, which the company plans to invest in 28 next-generation train sets and significant upgrades to the Northeast Corridor.

https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/28/...d-trains-2021/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top