Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather > Hurricanes
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2015, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,405 posts, read 74,915,183 times
Reputation: 16571

Advertisements

Sad. Sad. Sad what is being thrown around and shared and retweeted over and over again. Fake images..

Read this entire conversation thread.

https://twitter.com/JustinWeather/st...84857410830336

https://twitter.com/AlexJLamers/stat...06797693440000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2015, 09:48 AM
 
Location: 30461
2,495 posts, read 1,836,959 times
Reputation: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by TerraDown View Post
I know that's not the worst picture of the damage, but Andrew...when we drove back into Broward using hwy 27... (and Andrew hit Dade), we saw the 50, 60 ft. tall pines...bent in rows backwards. You could tell just by looking at it it was wind damage up in Broward, but very powerful.


When we made it to Miami, it looked like a nuke had been set off.
I hope the best for them.
Andrew struck before dawn. Because of this, you couldn't really see the wind in broad daylight like you can with Patricia. Before Patrica, the best footage we had of high wind on camera was Charley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 11:22 AM
SFX
 
Location: Tennessee
1,603 posts, read 867,314 times
Reputation: 1275
The 1959 hurricane that hit in the same area, was so much worse.

1 Nov 1959, Page 1 - at Newspapers.com



Early warning is part of it, but according to reports, that storm was far worse.
Attached Thumbnails
Pacific - Patricia becomes one of strongest hurricanes on record! Landfall W Mexico soon!-1959-storm.png  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,405 posts, read 74,915,183 times
Reputation: 16571
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFX View Post
The 1959 hurricane that hit in the same area, was so much worse.

1 Nov 1959, Page 1 - at Newspapers.com

Early warning is part of it, but according to reports, that storm was far worse.
Yup... and many others were much worse. I guess AGW's cant use Patricia in that sense. Now imagine Patricia hitting a populated area... imagine the headlines and the blame on you know what we would see everywhere.

To be honest, I would of rather lived through those big storms of the past then now, even without warning, just so I don't have to hear the Bullsit out there.

It must of been so nice to "discuss" weather events and extremes in the past. Now its about 1 thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 12:17 PM
 
7,255 posts, read 4,589,528 times
Reputation: 2100
icyclone interviewed on the weather channel while ago. No video, just audio phone call. They were in the eye at landfall.

http://www.weather.com/storms/hurric...or-of-patricia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 02:47 PM
 
7,255 posts, read 4,589,528 times
Reputation: 2100
Patricia is no more. Fallen apart south of Texas / Mexico border well SW of McAllen, TX. Heavy scattered rains will continue into much of southeastern Texas and into Lousinana.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,652 posts, read 60,572,966 times
Reputation: 101051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychoma View Post
Patricia is no more. Fallen apart south of Texas / Mexico border well SW of McAllen, TX. Heavy scattered rains will continue into much of southeastern Texas and into Lousinana.
I'm in northeast Texas and we've already gotten over ten inches of rain with another 4 inches or so in the forecast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 05:24 PM
 
24,373 posts, read 22,986,934 times
Reputation: 14948
I got the distinct impression that they were exaggerating this storm and hyping it to the point where they were fabricating the data. Now we see that the damage and effects of the " worst storm in recorded history" was far less severe than they predicted. So now we're left wondering exactly WHY they felt they had to lie about it and WHY they now feel that its okay to deceive people with fictitious news reporting and climatological events. This has the stench of the global warming agenda all over it.
So what was it, a class 3 or a even just a class 2 hurricane?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 06:28 PM
 
7,255 posts, read 4,589,528 times
Reputation: 2100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
I got the distinct impression that they were exaggerating this storm and hyping it to the point where they were fabricating the data. Now we see that the damage and effects of the " worst storm in recorded history" was far less severe than they predicted. So now we're left wondering exactly WHY they felt they had to lie about it and WHY they now feel that its okay to deceive people with fictitious news reporting and climatological events. This has the stench of the global warming agenda all over it.
So what was it, a class 3 or a even just a class 2 hurricane?
Several Meteorologist are upset how the media handled this event. Giant headlines mainly serving as 'click-bate', inaccurate reporting of the AFFECT people would see was WAAYYY out of proportion (in that the devastation will actually happen in a small few miles radius of the center and not 100 miles of coast like some media outlets portrayed), interviews with tourist out of harms way saying it wasn't bad, etc. etc.

The only upside to such 'attention' is people take note and that hopefully saves some lives BUT this type of reporting leads to deaths in future storm events because people won't take it as seriously.

The storm was one for the record books. Reconnaissance data proves this. Prior to landfall the storm is believed to have been entering an 'eye wall replacement cycle' where it rebuilds its eye/center (common for larger storms) which it loses some strength prior to building back up again over a several hour period. Also was starting to interact with a trough. I do not believe we were allowed to collect data over Mexican air space during the storm, only fly over it to get to the storm when it was in international waters.

These more powerful storms are VERY compact with hurricane force winds (74mph sustained or greater) but in this case ONLY going out some 30ish miles from the center. If you were over 35 miles from the center....you DIDN'T see hurricane force winds in this event = NO BIG DAMAGE!

But that small area of 2-5+/- miles...devastation expected.

The Mexican military is clearing hwy 200 along the coast to get to the landfall location from the North and the South. We do not have any photos or videos yet from the actual landfall location that I'm aware of.

We are VERY lucky that it hit in a more remote location = a LOT less damage will be seen / available to film as far as structures go. Had this storm jogged a little to the north or a little to the south it would have hit areas with 200,000+ people around Puerto Vallarta and 100,000+ around Manzanillo, Mexico. VERY different story had that occurred.

A storm chaser was in the landfall location. Awaiting their pressure readings from 3 pressure gauges that will help in a BIG way in determining fairly accurately what strength this storm actually was at landfall. Too soon to tell right now. We DO know that the storm was weaker at landfall...preliminary estimates are 165mph sustained but that's ONLY right around where the eye came ashore and then mountainous terrain quickly tears apart the hurricane.

Last edited by Psychoma; 10-24-2015 at 06:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 07:09 PM
 
7,255 posts, read 4,589,528 times
Reputation: 2100
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon View Post
I'm in northeast Texas and we've already gotten over ten inches of rain with another 4 inches or so in the forecast.
Yep, heavy rains before the remnants of Patricia add more rains to the area. Flooding is the number one killer in hurricanes (surge & inland flooding combined). They can dump a lot of rain which is good for drought striken areas but all at once comes at a price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather > Hurricanes

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top