Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather > Hurricanes
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-27-2021, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,895 posts, read 6,595,852 times
Reputation: 6415

Advertisements

The USA has seen plenty of major hurricane destruction from many hurricanes. Andrew, Maria, Harvey, Sandy, Ike, Irma, Laura, etc. But how come Katrina is always seen as the one we always reference when we measure damage. “this is Katrina-esque” “obviously not as bad as Katrina but...” etc. It’s the reference point for some reason?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2021, 07:43 PM
 
7,259 posts, read 4,629,838 times
Reputation: 2105
Some storm names just seem to 'stick' for some reason. But it may be for a combination of reasons in this case perhaps. Highest US storm surge on record 27.8ft in MS. Depending which site you look at, when adjusted for inflation typically tops the named storm list in terms of most damage in dollars. Highest US mainland death toll from a hurricane since 1928 at 1,800+. With the flooding in New Orleans sticking around for weeks the storm didn't just disappear off the news after a few days. Stirred up political controversies. 2005 was the last time a Cat3 or higher struck the US mainland until Harvey in 2017, the longest stretch of no Major Hurricane(Cat3+) landfalls ever recorded in the US. Also I think a good portion of the more well known names in the weather community watched it unfold back then so probably stuck with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2021, 10:44 PM
 
12,847 posts, read 9,055,079 times
Reputation: 34940
It's simply the most recent really big one and pretty much every adult remembers it. Before it everything was measured in Andrew. And before it Hugo. And before that Camille. When we get another really big, bad hurricane of the same scale, then they'll forget all about Katrina and compare everything to the next "big one."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2021, 12:13 PM
 
4,952 posts, read 3,055,358 times
Reputation: 6752
Storm surge is the reason, and location.
Katrina was a massively large system in diameter, moving entire off-shore oil rigs onto land; and permanently displacing thousands who never returned to NO.
These are once per generation type events, where many unlikely factors all come together.
I went through Charlie in 04', a much stronger storm from wind perspective; and almost zero surge due to it being a super small diameter cat 5.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unV5KcSrY-I
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather > Hurricanes

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top