Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2010, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Wichita,Kansas
2,732 posts, read 6,769,167 times
Reputation: 1371

Advertisements

Watchdog Group SPLC lists some anti-illegal immigration groups as..
"Hate Groups".But doesnt list any Reconquista,La Raza ethnocentrist..
Front groups.Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2010, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Oklahoma(formerly SoCalif) Originally Mich,
13,387 posts, read 19,437,818 times
Reputation: 4611
Quote:
Originally Posted by averagejoe76 View Post
Watchdog Group SPLC lists some anti-illegal immigration groups as..
"Hate Groups".But doesnt list any Reconquista,La Raza ethnocentrist..
Front groups.Why?
Good question.

It's because those calling the names and making accusations are the actual "Hate Groups"

This is one of the few weapons they have to use,
and it's getting so old that no ones falling for it anymore.

Who's calling who what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,532,311 times
Reputation: 25777
Quote:
Originally Posted by averagejoe76 View Post
Watchdog Group SPLC lists some anti-illegal immigration groups as..
"Hate Groups".But doesnt list any Reconquista,La Raza ethnocentrist..
Front groups.Why?

Because SPLC IS a hate group. I thought that was pretty well understood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Don't be a cry baby!
1,309 posts, read 1,363,224 times
Reputation: 617
^^^ yup!

It’s the "anti" groups that are "ANTI".
Groups that are assembled to unite certain people are the groups that separate them from everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 01:19 PM
 
4,875 posts, read 10,077,459 times
Reputation: 1993
They list one group... Voz de Aztlan, which is anti-semitic and anti-gay: Tiny Chicano Group Pushes Racism and Homophobia | Southern Poverty Law Center

But they do not list Mecha: http://www.splcenter.org/sites/defau...rra_letter.pdf

"We have not listed MEChA because, despite Tanton’s characterization of it as “a small hard-left Hispanic group,†we have found no evidence to support charges that the organization is racist or anti-Semitic."

Quote:
Originally Posted by averagejoe76 View Post
Watchdog Group SPLC lists some anti-illegal immigration groups as..
"Hate Groups".But doesnt list any Reconquista,La Raza ethnocentrist..
Front groups.Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma(formerly SoCalif) Originally Mich,
13,387 posts, read 19,437,818 times
Reputation: 4611
All I can say for them is....


YouTube - U S A MILITARY MARCH TAPS ON TRUMPET (DEDICATED TO FAT JOE)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 06:05 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,444 times
Reputation: 11
We, mexican people will continue to go to the USA, as long as the big imbalances that nation has imposed, remain.

In the 1800's you realized MEXICO was a great place to live, otherwise you hadn't fought so hard to possess our northern states, clipping our future as a Nation. You are now simply suffering from your heroes mistakes. You've never considered us "friends" or "allies", you have always been searching for something to take away from us, leaving us in poverty, that's the reason for mass immigration in the US.

Blame your history, your greedy leaders. Those who unilateraly decided to annex Texas and Hawaii, land from former sovereing nations; although MEXICO & HAWAII were friendly to your citizens or should we call them filibusters?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 06:41 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,325,592 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Roma View Post
We, mexican people will continue to go to the USA, as long as the big imbalances that nation has imposed, remain.

In the 1800's you realized MEXICO was a great place to live, otherwise you hadn't fought so hard to possess our northern states, clipping our future as a Nation. You are now simply suffering from your heroes mistakes. You've never considered us "friends" or "allies", you have always been searching for something to take away from us, leaving us in poverty, that's the reason for mass immigration in the US.

Blame your history, your greedy leaders. Those who unilateraly decided to annex Texas and Hawaii, land from former sovereing nations; although MEXICO & HAWAII were friendly to your citizens or should we call them filibusters?
The same old whine from another topic using the U.S. as a scapegoat for Mexico's failures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 07:03 PM
 
364 posts, read 244,498 times
Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Roma View Post
We, mexican people will continue to go to the USA, as long as the big imbalances that nation has imposed, remain.

In the 1800's you realized MEXICO was a great place to live, otherwise you hadn't fought so hard to possess our northern states, clipping our future as a Nation. You are now simply suffering from your heroes mistakes. You've never considered us "friends" or "allies", you have always been searching for something to take away from us, leaving us in poverty, that's the reason for mass immigration in the US.

Blame your history, your greedy leaders. Those who unilateraly decided to annex Texas and Hawaii, land from former sovereing nations; although MEXICO & HAWAII were friendly to your citizens or should we call them filibusters?
germany japan s korea taiwon
were much wurse off than mexico
60 year ago
an tha first 4 are rich today
tha prblem is with mexican culcure
not tha usa takin half of mexico
160 year ago
but mexico dont want guatemala back
it an salvador etc. were al part of tha mexican empire
after spain was kicked out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma(formerly SoCalif) Originally Mich,
13,387 posts, read 19,437,818 times
Reputation: 4611
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
The same old whine from another topic using the U.S. as a scapegoat for Mexico's failures.
Doesn't this BS get tiresome and sickening?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top