Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-04-2011, 09:29 PM
 
111 posts, read 97,653 times
Reputation: 41

Advertisements

Well there goes my vote for him and I was thinking about it but this is a deal breaker, the only person to rank lower than him is guess who? Obama!




2012 Presidential Hopefuls' Immigration Stances | NumbersUSA - For Lower Immigration Levels
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2011, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Arizona
555 posts, read 876,947 times
Reputation: 346
Good info. It looks like we've already lost our courtry no matter who is elected. But that really doesn't surprise me. It took both democrats and republicans to run up that $14 trillion deficit. Politicians are all liars and crooks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 07:51 AM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,315,469 times
Reputation: 2136
Yes, Ron Paul is not the candidate to vote for if you are an anti-illegal immigrationist. I suggest Herman Cain and/or Michelle Bachman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,454,776 times
Reputation: 27720
It doesn't really say much in details. Here's something else with his stand in immigration.
If you notice he wants to remove all incentives for them to come, stay and make use of our entitlement programs.
Rather than round them up and ship them back...remove all financial,legal incentives for them to come in the first place.

Ron Paul on the Issues
  • If economy were good, there’d be no immigration problem. (Dec 2007)
  • Amend Constitution to remove aliens’ birthright citizenship. (Dec 2007)
  • Those who attack bilingualism are jealous & feel inferior. (Dec 2007)
  • No amnesty, but impractical to round up 12 million illegals. (Sep 2007)
  • Immigration problem is consequence of welfare state. (Sep 2007)
  • No amnesty, but border fence isn’t so important. (Jun 2007)
  • We subsidize illegal immigration, so we get more. (Jun 2007)
  • Keep rule barring immigrants from running for president. (May 2007)
  • End all incentives and amnesty for illegal immigrants. (Jan 2006)
  • Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border. (Sep 2006)
  • Voted YES on preventing tipping off Mexicans about Minuteman Project. (Jun 2006)
  • Voted YES on reporting illegal aliens who receive hospital treatment. (May 2004)
  • Voted YES on extending Immigrant Residency rules. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on more immigrant visas for skilled workers. (Sep 1998)
  • Sponsored bill banning student visas from terrorist nations. (Jan 2003)
  • Rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a voting record restricting immigration. (Dec 2003)
  • Rated 83% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance. (Dec 2006)
  • Government services in English only. (Mar 2008)
  • Rated C by the ALI, indicating an acceptably anti-amnesty stance. (Nov 2010)
  • Declare English as the official language of the US. (Feb 2007)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 09:02 AM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,315,469 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It doesn't really say much in details. Here's something else with his stand in immigration.
If you notice he wants to remove all incentives for them to come, stay and make use of our entitlement programs.
Rather than round them up and ship them back...remove all financial,legal incentives for them to come in the first place.

Ron Paul on the Issues
  • If economy were good, there’d be no immigration problem. (Dec 2007)
  • Amend Constitution to remove aliens’ birthright citizenship. (Dec 2007)
  • Those who attack bilingualism are jealous & feel inferior. (Dec 2007)
  • No amnesty, but impractical to round up 12 million illegals. (Sep 2007)
  • Immigration problem is consequence of welfare state. (Sep 2007)
  • No amnesty, but border fence isn’t so important. (Jun 2007)
  • We subsidize illegal immigration, so we get more. (Jun 2007)
  • Keep rule barring immigrants from running for president. (May 2007)
  • End all incentives and amnesty for illegal immigrants. (Jan 2006)
  • Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border. (Sep 2006)
  • Voted YES on preventing tipping off Mexicans about Minuteman Project. (Jun 2006)
  • Voted YES on reporting illegal aliens who receive hospital treatment. (May 2004)
  • Voted YES on extending Immigrant Residency rules. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on more immigrant visas for skilled workers. (Sep 1998)
  • Sponsored bill banning student visas from terrorist nations. (Jan 2003)
  • Rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a voting record restricting immigration. (Dec 2003)
  • Rated 83% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance. (Dec 2006)
  • Government services in English only. (Mar 2008)
  • Rated C by the ALI, indicating an acceptably anti-amnesty stance. (Nov 2010)
  • Declare English as the official language of the US. (Feb 2007)
Many of these are not up to date. Some are even over 10 years old. Here is the latest on Ron Paul and other presidential hopefuls.

2012 Presidential Hopefuls' Immigration Stances | NumbersUSA - For Lower Immigration Levels
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
2,871 posts, read 4,791,578 times
Reputation: 5247
Very disappointing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 01:35 PM
 
195 posts, read 250,401 times
Reputation: 52
Libertarians are basically anarchists. They don't believe in law and order because law and order in their opinion is just another form of of big government intruding in people's private lives. They see being tough on illegal immigration and securing out borders as taking away the freedoms of illegals who want to come to America for a better life.

Libertarians believe that people should be able to freely immigrate to any country on the planet that they want to without going through the proper process. They believe in open borders because closed borders to them is just another form of fascism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2011, 12:44 PM
 
10 posts, read 34,462 times
Reputation: 24
Your representation of Libertarianism is incredibly off-base.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2011, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Portlandia "burbs"
10,229 posts, read 16,295,747 times
Reputation: 26005
This does not surprise me at all. During his last running Paul showed no interested in addressing illegal immigration, anyway.

I had an interest in the Libertarian Party back in the 90's, so I stopped at the local chapter to pick up information. I was dishearted to read two agendas they supported that went totally against my stance, and illegal immigration was one of them. It was printed right on the page in black and white that the Libertarian Party believed that these trespassers had a "right" to be here.

With that, the materials went into the garbage and I never entertained the possibility of enrolling in the Libertarian Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top