Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2009, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,618,997 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

One year after the largest raid in U.S. history, we rarely hear stories of small towns suffering in the absence of immigrants.

A Give and Take on Immigration | The American Prospect
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2009, 11:37 AM
 
2,095 posts, read 2,582,915 times
Reputation: 1268
Illegal aliens are not immigrants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 11:55 AM
 
103 posts, read 140,434 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonian123 View Post
Illegal aliens are not immigrants.
So, what are we suppose to discuss in this forum (Illegal Immigration)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Land of Sunshine & Sh*t
163 posts, read 241,017 times
Reputation: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw0rdfish View Post
So, what are we suppose to discuss in this forum (Illegal Immigration)
Illegal aliens of course!.

IMMIGRANTS are those that come to the US from another country LEGALLY and STRIVE to become American and to adapt to our culture and obey our laws. And to contribute and give back to our society

ILLEGAL ALIENS are those that come to the US from another country ILLEGALLY and REFUSE to become American or to adapt to our culture or obey our laws. And to take our services and anything else than can scam.

So as Bostonian123 said above - "Illegal aliens are not immigrants".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,148,401 times
Reputation: 3861
If employers were not so damn greedy: they would pay appropriate wages that would attract Americans------------especially with our pooched economy.

Besides: quite a few of us would not mind living in smaller towns------------if the work was there.

Sounds like a win-win to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 02:41 PM
 
2,381 posts, read 5,047,321 times
Reputation: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
One year after the largest raid in U.S. history, we rarely hear stories of small towns suffering in the absence of immigrants.

A Give and Take on Immigration | The American Prospect
This is a great article on the negative effects of deportation. I dont encourage immigrating illegally but I do feel that at this point it would save braking up families and support our economy if we legalize immigrants that have been here for a great number of years and have been contributing to our economy by paying taxes.

Great post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 03:00 PM
 
8,978 posts, read 16,562,173 times
Reputation: 3020
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
One year after the largest raid in U.S. history, we rarely hear stories of small towns suffering in the absence of immigrants.

A Give and Take on Immigration | The American Prospect
For decades following the Civil War, many parts of the South lingered in chaos and poverty, suffering from the 'sudden absence of their slaves'. Must have been a tough adjustment.....but you're not trying to suggest that we should seriously consider bringing back slavery, are you?

Illegal immigration is a "bad" system. Employing underpaid, vulnerable, exploitable, under-protected, illegal 'help' is not the mark of a "healthy" economy. Any town, or any industry, that suffers unduly because it suddenly 'loses its illegals' was doing something wrong BEFORE it lost them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 03:05 PM
 
2,381 posts, read 5,047,321 times
Reputation: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by macmeal View Post
For decades following the Civil War, many parts of the South lingered in chaos and poverty, suffering from the 'sudden absence of their slaves'. Must have been a tough adjustment.....but you're not trying to suggest that we should seriously consider bringing back slavery, are you?

Illegal immigration is a "bad" system. Employing underpaid, vulnerable, exploitable, under-protected, illegal 'help' is not the mark of a "healthy" economy. Any town, or any industry, that suffers unduly because it suddenly 'loses its illegals' was doing something wrong BEFORE it lost them.
Hello my dear macmeal!

In regards to your statement, I think this is why people are in favor of an amnesty, to avoid all that you stated above and at the same time we would not have any loss in the economy of those communities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 03:15 PM
 
7,025 posts, read 11,414,482 times
Reputation: 1107
Quote:
Originally Posted by zacatecana View Post
This is a great article on the negative effects of deportation. I dont encourage immigrating illegally but I do feel that at this point it would save braking up families and support our economy if we legalize immigrants that have been here for a great number of years and have been contributing to our economy by paying taxes.

Great post
Who do you think you are kidding? Illegal aliens break up their own families and leave them in mexico every single day to come to the US illegally and start new ones in order to rape America's social services and deplete our tax dollars. Those who do work do so in order to send remittances to "support your" (aka mexico's) economy.

You would be better off wasting your time telling Flor that her 3 children haven't seen her in SEVEN YEARS and that she needs to take her sorry butt back to mexico to see if they or the mother she dumped them on 7 YEARS AGO are still alive.

Quote:
Flor Crisóstomo has lived in the U.S. for six years and worked at IFCO Systems, a company that manufactures wooden pallets. She was arrested along with 25 others in a workplace raid in April. Flor has three children in Mexico.
http://socialistworker.org/2006-1/592/592_12_HungerStrikers.shtmll (broken link)
Those who are deported have the ability to take every single one of their family members back with them, including anchors. We don't want them and we certainly don't need to legalize millions of 3rd grade educated, non assimilating criminals who will NEVER earn enough money to taxes.
Any taxes that they might pay are returned via EIC when they file taxes at the end of the year. Again, who do you think you're kidding

Legalizing millions of poverty stricken, uneducated, low wage earners equals a net zero in terms of benefiting any country which is why mexico continues to send it's poverty stricken masses to the US.

Sorry the pinata has been busted and the party is over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2009, 03:20 PM
 
8,978 posts, read 16,562,173 times
Reputation: 3020
Quote:
Originally Posted by zacatecana View Post
Hello my dear macmeal!

In regards to your statement, I think this is why people are in favor of an amnesty, to avoid all that you stated above and at the same time we would not have any loss in the economy of those communities.
OK, OK, there you go...."all heart" but no practicality!

I don't expect to change your mind, but remember this...when the slaves were 'amnestised' (freed) after the civil war, their problems didn't go away. MOST of them immediately became the newest rank of "free labor"..they ended up in direct competition with the REST of the "free labor" (poverty-stricken whites) and BOTH groups ended up spending decades as 'share-croppers' in a 'dog-eat-dog' feudal system in which the "rich" who ran the South benefitted by pitting poor black against poor white.

This analogy is only PARTIALLY applicable to the present-day situation....but I seriously doubt that simply giving amnesty to 20 million "formerly illegals" would be very well accepted by the public. I have no doubt that serious problems would follow, and probably the "amnestised" group would be forced to CONTINUALLY "prove" their right to be here, since they would be seen as 'coming in through the back door'.

Remember, this isn't the FIRST amnesty we've considered. Does it seem to YOU like the earlier ones 'worked'?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top