Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Speak for YOurself Pilgrim, I am of "mixed race"...
It's that "Mestizo" category YOu keep talking about...
(The Mexica Movement recognizes the indigenous tribes of Canada, Thanks Grandpa!)...
It doesn't matter: the whites did nothing worse than what Indians did to each other. Most of the Indian tribes were squatters; nothing more, till another group of Indians ran the 1st group off or killed them after taking their young women, if lucky. Most Indians had NO title to the land.
It doesn't matter: the whites did nothing worse than what Indians did to each other. Most of the Indian tribes were squatters; nothing more, till another group of Indians ran the 1st group off or killed them after taking their young women, if lucky. Most Indians had NO title to the land.
By the map "CamaroGuy" posts, with the Mexican flag added to the image, I even have an "out": The spouse of a Mexican citizen can in fact easily naturalize to Mexico, if there is a "change of ownership" to the immediate countryside where Geronimo once roamed...
Speak for YOurself Pilgrim, I am of "mixed race"...
It's that "Mestizo" category YOu keep talking about...
(The Mexica Movement recognizes the indigenous tribes of Canada, Thanks Grandpa!)...
The fact remains that you are also of the white race in your genetic mixture. You have admitted that yourself.
The Mexica Movement and other reconquista types are hypocrites then because hardly anyone is pure blooded anything anymore. In their line of reasoning then anyone who has white European blood in them would be illegal in this country to be fair. That would include the Mestizos of Mexico but they evidently want to dismiss their white Spanish blood in all of this and count them only as indigenous.
By the map "CamaroGuy" posts, with the Mexican flag added to the image, I even have an "out": The spouse of a Mexican citizen can in fact easily naturalize to Mexico, if there is a "change of ownership" to the immediate countryside where Geronimo once roamed...
Thanks Honey...
I don't think that going to happen. More like Mexico becoming part of the US, at least the parts worth having.
By the map "CamaroGuy" posts, with the Mexican flag added to the image, I even have an "out": The spouse of a Mexican citizen can in fact easily naturalize to Mexico, if there is a "change of ownership" to the immediate countryside where Geronimo once roamed...
Thanks Honey...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan
I don't think that going to happen. More like Mexico becoming part of the US, at least the parts worth having.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum
Mexico is a sovereign nation, how would the United States be able to annex that territory?...
Look at your top post. The same thing goes BOTH ways.
Too bad that so many Mexicans (illegals) don't think that WE have soveirgn borders.
CANADA - is treated like it is up for grabs by migrants from south america..central america and mexico..they actually think that no one owns the place..when I mentioned that Canada is a sovereign nation...I got called a racist....what the heck...If you occupy a house for 60 years you have more rights and authority than the person who has been here for 60 days...first in line counts..
CANADA - is treated like it is up for grabs by migrants from south america..central america and mexico..they actually think that no one owns the place..when I mentioned that Canada is a sovereign nation...I got called a racist....what the heck...If you occupy a house for 60 years you have more rights and authority than the person who has been here for 60 days...first in line counts..
AND they would call you a racist if you said that you thought their countries should allow in an unlimited number of Canadians.
It's like the USA, the illegals believe there should be absolutely no limits nor any rules on immigration from their countries or their "race". Most pro-illegals really don't say the USA should take in unlimited immigrants from Africa, Haiti, China, Cambodia -- although there are some who insist we must.
Most pro-illegals wanted unlimited immigration from hispanic nations. They want no Central American to have to respect borders or immigration laws and will insist that the Aztecs once ruled over all of North America -- which of course they never did.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
