Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2010, 06:58 AM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,803 posts, read 8,757,650 times
Reputation: 3022

Advertisements

Quote:
The Los Angeles City Council, protesting Arizona's tough crackdown on illegal immigration, voted Wednesday to ban most city travel to Arizona and future contracts with companies in that state.

The resolution, which now heads to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, would still allow city officials to travel to Arizona under "special circumstances" that are in the city's interests. Also, existing contracts with Arizona firms would be exempt from the ban if canceling them would lead to "significant additional cost" to the city.
- Yes. Arizona needs to feel the consequences of enacting a bad law. 2.1% (377 votes)

- Yes, though the boycott should be more of a symbolic gesture than an official measure. 0.3% (62 votes)

- No, but only because doing so is probably illegal and not in L.A.'s interest. 4.2% (761 votes)

- No. The city should mind its own business. 93.4% (16,877 votes)

Total Votes: 18,077

Feel free to weigh in on this issue and read the comments at the bottom of the poll.

Poll: Was the L.A. City Council right to pass a boycott of Arizona? | Opinion L.A. | Los Angeles Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2010, 07:02 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,781,705 times
Reputation: 22474
It would seem that the politicos of Los Angeles have enough on their plate, they should be working on their own city and stop trying to bother everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 07:04 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,359,012 times
Reputation: 4212
Uh huh- when will these ******* moonbats ever learn?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,173,365 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kele View Post
- Yes. Arizona needs to feel the consequences of enacting a bad law. 2.1% (377 votes)

- Yes, though the boycott should be more of a symbolic gesture than an official measure. 0.3% (62 votes)

- No, but only because doing so is probably illegal and not in L.A.'s interest. 4.2% (761 votes)

- No. The city should mind its own business. 93.4% (16,877 votes)

Total Votes: 18,077

Feel free to weigh in on this issue and read the comments at the bottom of the poll.

Poll: Was the L.A. City Council right to pass a boycott of Arizona? | Opinion L.A. | Los Angeles Times
Wow...............just wow. I did not realize that the people of LA were that indeed hostile towards their treasonous 'leaders'.

If I were Antonio 'MEChA' Villargairosa (sp); I would be watching my (political) back now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 07:10 AM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,173,365 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
I can think of one contract the city won't be able cancel, let alone modify because of the boycott: service by Arizona-based airlines US Airways and Mesa Air at LAX. Federal regulations prohibit public airports from unjustly discriminating against different carriers; telling US Airways it can no longer serve LAX because of an ideological disagreement between Los Angeles and Arizona probably wouldn't fly with the feds. Then there's the issue of whether the boycott is even constitutional at all.
Poll: Was the L.A. City Council right to pass a boycott of Arizona? | Opinion L.A. | Los Angeles Times

Reading between the lines here: methinks that the City of Los Angeles may be trying to look for a way out now since the LA Times all but castigated that vote in favor of said boycott.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 07:13 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,889,086 times
Reputation: 9284
You should see what the illegals have done to the predominantly hispanic areas in California... nobody wants to live there except poor hispanics... its no wonder, most people don't want more illegal immigration except idiots.. unfortunately, we have idiots who run cities and government departments... that should be scary... when elected leaders don't enforce the law but enforce ideology instead... no wonder America is in the crapper...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 11:09 AM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,470,921 times
Reputation: 31496
So much for "californio sur" and his constant claims that Californians are largely against AZ and the new law. He's full of it, just like LA City Council is full of it. How freakin' delusional and off target can one get? These elected officials better figure out FAST how to clean up the mess they vomited when they decided to stage this hispandering boycott.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 11:15 AM
 
Location: ...at a 3AM epiphany
2,205 posts, read 2,539,622 times
Reputation: 453
I'm just giggling all over the place imagining the encompassed "Uh-Oh"....ha!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 11:20 AM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,803 posts, read 8,757,650 times
Reputation: 3022
Read the comments. L.A. residents/taxpayers are incensed by the fact that the City Council is unable or unwilling to clean their own house, yet they have the time and inclination to involve themselves in another state's business.

Villar will pass it though. What does he care? Once he leaves L.A., his political career is over, done, cooked!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2010, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,173,365 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kele View Post
Read the comments. L.A. residents/taxpayers are incensed by the fact that the City Council is unable or unwilling to clean their own house, yet they have the time and inclination to involve themselves in another state's business.

Villar will pass it though. What does he care? Once he leaves L.A., his political career is over, done, cooked!
I would like to see Tony the Toilet Cleaner (with all due respect to those folks who really clean restrooms) see some prison time for ______.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top