Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-23-2013, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,407,718 times
Reputation: 5368

Advertisements

Mixed economic messages:

Unemployment rates have dropped in 9 metro areas in the state, but total metro employment only increased in 4 metro areas from April 2012 to April 2013. Interestingly, despite an increase of ~47,000 jobs in Chicago from April last year, the MSA unemployment is up 0.5% from last April. Maybe due to more people entering the labor market and looking for jobs?

The lowest unemployment rates in Illinois are in the following metros:

Bloomington-Normal: 5.8%
Quad Cities: 6.2%
Springfield: 6.4%

All the numbers can be found here: IDES: Unemployment Falls in Most Areas Compared to Last Year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2013, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Not where you ever lived
11,535 posts, read 30,265,438 times
Reputation: 6426
This is good despite the fact all four lost population. However, I think it is skewed as it does include Iowa and Wisconsin population in Illinois. It would be just as skewed to include Illinois in Iowa and Wisconsin data.

It is sample of our government at work. It is too much trouble to be accurate. It would also be a bit more accurate if seasonal was included, too - even it was a separate window. .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,407,718 times
Reputation: 5368
Quote:
Originally Posted by linicx View Post
This is good despite the fact all four lost population. However, I think it is skewed as it does include Iowa and Wisconsin population in Illinois. It would be just as skewed to include Illinois in Iowa and Wisconsin data.

It is sample of our government at work. It is too much trouble to be accurate. It would also be a bit more accurate if seasonal was included, too - even it was a separate window. .
Just to be clear, the only city that lost population was Rockford (and I'm not sure about its MSA). Chicago is estimated to be +20,000 people since 2010. According to the recent data, all of the others have gained in population. See:

//www.city-data.com/forum/chica...estimates.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Not where you ever lived
11,535 posts, read 30,265,438 times
Reputation: 6426
Maintainschaos...

Your link doesn''t work for me; I did this. It has different data but it is NOT about unemployment. Unemployment is down and home sales are slowly rising. It's all good news.

//www.city-data.com/forum/chica...timates-2.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top