Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2010, 12:56 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,159,646 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

"In an order Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood in Manhattan entered a permanent injunction, ordering the service to disable the searching, downloading, uploading or file trading of its software and to block the sharing of unauthorized music files.... She also found Mark Gorton, LimeWire's founder, personally liable.

"'We are extremely proud of our pioneering history and have, for years, worked hard to bridge the gap between technology and content rights holders,' [Chief Executive] Searle said in the statement. 'However, at this time, we have no option but to cease further distribution and support of our software.'"

LimeWire Is Ordered to Shut Permanently - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2010, 01:47 AM
 
Location: Columbia, California
6,664 posts, read 30,617,939 times
Reputation: 5184
There is always a new torrent site to replace the old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 04:31 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
The problem I have with this is they are blaming the technology and not the people abusing it. Historically the RIAA and MPAA have a long history of trying to kill or hamper tech that can potentially interfere with their business. The VCR, Standalone CD recorders, DAT, MP3 players, DVD/CD burners.... that's just the short list. While they have legitimate concerns their rights do not trump those of the public.

Last edited by thecoalman; 10-28-2010 at 04:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 06:09 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,146,617 times
Reputation: 12920
Who actually used limewire anyways? It had it's day in the early 2000's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 08:43 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,201,643 times
Reputation: 7693
For every torrent site they close down at least one more will pop up and take it's place. The RIAA and MPAA will never learn.

An mp3 costs how much now? $1.20? A CD? $12 to $15.00?? Remember the old vinyl LP records? What did they cost? $16.00? How many songs were on the LP? 16 or so? Just checked Amazon, CD's go for $12.00 to $20.00

In 2010 paying MORE for songs than in the 70's? This is why the torrent sites will never get shut down, people are NOT going to get ripped off.... Maybe if they charged something reasonable people might actually buy music.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:40 PM
 
713 posts, read 3,438,748 times
Reputation: 550
Funny how one torrented song is worth more than 3 human lives in todays world. An article I found a month ago stated how an airport gave 20K to family's who lost someone when a plane crashed and how a lady was charged 60K for every illegal song she downloaded. -sign-
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 05:58 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,299 posts, read 77,129,965 times
Reputation: 45659
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
For every torrent site they close down at least one more will pop up and take it's place. The RIAA and MPAA will never learn.

An mp3 costs how much now? $1.20? A CD? $12 to $15.00?? Remember the old vinyl LP records? What did they cost? $16.00? How many songs were on the LP? 16 or so? Just checked Amazon, CD's go for $12.00 to $20.00

In 2010 paying MORE for songs than in the 70's? This is why the torrent sites will never get shut down, people are NOT going to get ripped off.... Maybe if they charged something reasonable people might actually buy music.
Somehow I just can't rationalize stealing something just because I don't like the price put on it by the owner.
There is a personal principle involved there, and it is one with which I am comfortable.

"Rip off" is an overused and often misapplied term. A "rip off" is when one party doesn't honor an agreement.
"Rip off" may apply when someone's intellectual or artistic property is stolen via torrenting or other unlicensed copying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 02:14 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,146,617 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
For every torrent site they close down at least one more will pop up and take it's place. The RIAA and MPAA will never learn.

An mp3 costs how much now? $1.20? A CD? $12 to $15.00?? Remember the old vinyl LP records? What did they cost? $16.00? How many songs were on the LP? 16 or so? Just checked Amazon, CD's go for $12.00 to $20.00

In 2010 paying MORE for songs than in the 70's? This is why the torrent sites will never get shut down, people are NOT going to get ripped off.... Maybe if they charged something reasonable people might actually buy music.
Um, inflation? Also, 16bit PCM is significantly superior to vinyl.

Do you steal cars because they used to cost $6000 in the 70's but now cost $35,000?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 10:13 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
An mp3 costs how much now? $1.20? A CD? $12 to $15.00?? Remember the old vinyl LP records? What did they cost? $16.00? How many songs were on the LP? 16 or so?
Usually about 8 to 10 on LP. Anything larger and it was issued as double album. As far as the cost difference:

Quote:
The Inflation Calculator

What cost $16 in 1980 would cost $41.12 in 2009.

Also, if you were to buy exactly the same products in 2009 and 1980,
they would cost you $16 and $5.46 respectively.
I don;t know what the current bitrate is for downloads? In any event if the standard is still 128 it's inferior product.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 10:38 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Um, inflation? Also, 16bit PCM is significantly superior to vinyl.
Possibly depending on who you want to listen too.

The issue becomes the remastering of these classic and not so classic songs.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UjQc...eature=related

Result here is the original will have more nuances with a richer and "warm" sound that most will find superior to the digital version that will have a more crisp but flat sound. Makes you wonder what you're missing out on for new releases.


---------edit--------

Here's sample of what you're missing, this compares CD version with the version on guitar hero of recent release from Metallica.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRyIACDCc1I

Last edited by thecoalman; 10-30-2010 at 10:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top