Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
100%. But I also work in this sector so..... Although a few are more "news / current events" questions than actual IT security questions.
2 wrong, I had no clue what method the Chinese hackers used - and I maintain that "something unique" (like a certificate) should have worked in the 2-factor authentication question.
My security setup will not allow that page to show.
Too bad, they have scanned your computer and know what you have.
So much for your 100%.
Yes - because false positives or mis-configurations would never happen....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA
2 wrong, I had no clue what method the Chinese hackers used - and I maintain that "something unique" (like a certificate) should have worked in the 2-factor authentication question.
multi-factor by definition is using a combination of controls that is characterized as something you have, are, and/or know (using two or more of these). Certs would really still be something you have.
Yes - because false positives or mis-configurations would never happen....
multi-factor by definition is using a combination of controls that is characterized as something you have, are, and/or know (using two or more of these). Certs would really still be something you have.
I'm not entirely disagreeing, but... grumblegrumblegrumble.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.