Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Back in 2008 I did a photo shoot in Colorado. In the contract between me and the guy who shot the pics I had permission by him to post them online. I was paid 400 bucks for doing those photos. Unfortunately sometime in 2011 ( unknown to me ) he had sold the pics to some group out of Toronto. Out of the blue in 2012 I had received a letter from an attorney in Toronto complete with a screen shot of one of my pics from that shoot taken from my Facebook page pretty much saying to take it down or else. At the time I had thought it was a joke. That joke so I had thought had ended being anything but as I will find out in early 2014 when that firm out of Toronto had hired a California firm to go after me. In the end not only did I take down the photo but we settled for 500 bucks which was one hundred more than I was paid to do those pics in the first place. As far as the guy who shot the pics well I never did find out where he was.
Unless there is a contract, licensing agreement or the person taking the pictures is your employee they belong to the photographer.
That said the photographer may need a model release when you have specific subject.
Exactly right! The photographer owns the pics, not the ones posing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.