Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-06-2009, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Middle Creek Township
2,036 posts, read 4,399,355 times
Reputation: 532

Advertisements

Kevin Davis, a blogger on the Web site "(sorry, probably against TOS to post the actual site)," said discouraging anonymous posting would have a chilling effect on the Internet.
"Sometimes, there's a real and clear need to have independent voices able to say what's on their mind," especially when questioning government officials and agencies, Davis said.

Bill would require apologies for slanderous Web posts :: WRAL.com


You tell 'em Kevin. It's great to have local support for our free speech. Let's "hope" we can always be allowed to speak what we feel, rather than being told what we can and can't say. Imagine how boring and monotone City Data would be if some politicians had their way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Durham, NC
1,232 posts, read 3,783,151 times
Reputation: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlton Dude View Post
It's great to have local support for our free speech. Let's "hope" we can always be allowed to speak what we feel, rather than being told what we can and can't say. Imagine how boring and monotone City Data would be if some politicians had their way.
I did not get that the bill would thwart free speech. From what it sounds like, a site would be required a period of time to remove any libel and slander (I imagine, 'confirmed' libel and slander) once they are made aware of such violations. Not a big deal and a bill in tandem support of laws that already exist. I think it advocates responsible posting. And if it means that we have less trollers who feel they can post anything they want about anything, they why not? Besides, no one really benefits from slanderous commentary other than the troller that posts it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2009, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Ellicott City MD
2,270 posts, read 9,153,379 times
Reputation: 1858
Since this thread has been moved to the Internet forum, let's clarify that it is discussing only a bill proposed in the State of North Carolina regarding slander on the internet. It is not a national bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top