Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-12-2012, 08:20 AM
 
11,175 posts, read 16,014,540 times
Reputation: 29925

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL). Solid company and good dividend of around 3%.

But the big deal is the shareholder benefits. If you like cruising and have 100 or more shares (I do) then you get $250 on-board-credit for a cruise 14 days or more in addition to the dividend. I own 150 shares and this is equivalent to a 5.35% dividend .... not per year but everytime I cruise on a ship owned by Carnival (e.g. Carnival, Costa, Cunard, Seabourn, Holland America, etc.)
That is a great "dividend" isn't it? I own both CCL & RCL for just that reason. Last year I took 5 cruises of 14+ days on HAL, RCL & Celebrity, and received onboard credits (obc) of $1,250. I already have two RCL cruises booked this year so that's another $500. Over the years, I've received much more in obc's than I paid for the underlying stock itself. And that doesn't even include the quarterly cash dividends that I've received.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2012, 11:07 AM
 
Location: New York, NY
650 posts, read 1,811,943 times
Reputation: 626
Are there any other stocks that offer incentives in addition to dividends? Like CCL's onboard credits. I heard MCD sends it's investors coupons once in a while. Anything else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2012, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Middleburg
906 posts, read 1,810,195 times
Reputation: 405
WVVI advertised a free wine club for stock owners, but shortly after getting my first two bottles of wine, I got a bill for something like $75/bottle. Talk about a bait and switch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2012, 03:17 PM
 
3,782 posts, read 5,325,949 times
Reputation: 6269
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainMen View Post
WVVI advertised a free wine club for stock owners, but shortly after getting my first two bottles of wine, I got a bill for something like $75/bottle. Talk about a bait and switch.
Well, maybe they parsed that phrase to mean free (wine) club. I.e., the club was free, not the wine.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2012, 04:30 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,919,186 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
That is a great "dividend" isn't it? I own both CCL & RCL for just that reason. Last year I took 5 cruises of 14+ days on HAL, RCL & Celebrity, and received onboard credits (obc) of $1,250. I already have two RCL cruises booked this year so that's another $500. Over the years, I've received much more in obc's than I paid for the underlying stock itself. And that doesn't even include the quarterly cash dividends that I've received.
I do a cruise about once every eight or nine months and always at least two weeks. Not as much as you but the OBC still mounts up. I actually count dividends as 'income' but use OBC to reduce my cost of ownership. It will not be long before I have completely recovered the cost of the underlying stock.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,083,618 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by CouponJack View Post
You have to remember no one is smarter than the market.
You like to say this, but its entirely self-refuting. After all, how exactly can you know this? Wouldn't it require, on some level, you to be "smarter than the market"? How is your claim fundamentally different than saying "I can beat the market"? Its not...and hence self-refuting.

Furthermore, suggesting that people should just buy index funds or whatever else is just a matter of speculation. This is the great scam of the mutual fund industry...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CouponJack View Post
Most people "tout" there winners, but always hide/don't post when they rack up the fees and losers.....
Yes there are people like this, but there are also many that are honest about their investing/trading activities. You just want to believe that everyone is hiding something because it conforms to what you wish to believe...


Quote:
Originally Posted by CouponJack View Post
Stock picking is NOT investing and shouldn't be counted on for retirement..(kind of buying lottery tickets which is retirement for the stupid)
Gibberish, investing in individual stocks for long term gain is most certainly investing. Now whether or not a particular individual should do this sort of thing in his/her retirement account is a matter of their tolerance for risk, market knowledge, etc. Its definitely not for everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,083,618 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainMen View Post
I agree, avoid the large cap dividend stocks like the plague. They're tied into almost every hedge fund and mutual fund, so they trade in lockstep with the overall market. When the funds sell (and they will when the boomers panic), JNJ, KO, PG, etc. all go down.
What exactly predicates that the boomers are going to panic? Regardless, what you're saying is true for most stocks. Boomers have their funds in all sorts of mutual funds and they invest in all sorts of equities...not just large-caps with good dividends.


Anyhow, I like trading stocks with good dividends that I'm at least mildly interested in holding as investments. That way if your trade goes south (assuming its not leveraged) you can just put it to the side and keep it as an investment. The only dividend stock I own at the moment is Microsoft and its good to see nobody mentioned it! I bought it a few weeks ago. But over the last year or so I've made a decent amount trading large-caps with good dividends, but every trade went well so I didn't have to hold any. I've owned GE 4 times in the last year....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Warwick, RI
5,477 posts, read 6,300,839 times
Reputation: 9528
Quote:
Stock picking is NOT investing and shouldn't be counted on for retirement


I beg to differ. IMHO, assigning a value to a stock, building in a margin of safety, buying it when it's undervalued and holding it while collecting dividends until it's fully valued or overvalued, all while ignoring general market trends is the ONLY way to get any kind of certainty out of the stock market. Refer to my favorite quote below, which I first read years ago and find to be just as true today:


"Bargains are the holy grail of the true stockpicker. The fact that 10-30 percent of our net worth is lost in a market sell-off is of little consequence. We see the latest correction not as a disaster but as an opportunity to acquire more shares at low prices. This is how great fortunes are made over time."

-Peter Lynch
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
9,116 posts, read 17,725,526 times
Reputation: 3722
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
You like to say this, but its entirely self-refuting. After all, how exactly can you know this? Wouldn't it require, on some level, you to be "smarter than the market"? How is your claim fundamentally different than saying "I can beat the market"? Its not...and hence self-refuting.

Furthermore, suggesting that people should just buy index funds or whatever else is just a matter of speculation. This is the great scam of the mutual fund industry...


Yes there are people like this, but there are also many that are honest about their investing/trading activities. You just want to believe that everyone is hiding something because it conforms to what you wish to believe...



Gibberish, investing in individual stocks for long term gain is most certainly investing. Now whether or not a particular individual should do this sort of thing in his/her retirement account is a matter of their tolerance for risk, market knowledge, etc. Its definitely not for everyone.
There will people who "beat" the market but unfortunately those are far and few inbetween (after taxes and costs). If I have a diversified portfolio of low cost investments tailored to my risk tolerance, I will come out ahead over the vast majority of investors who gamble w/an undiversified portfolio. I'll take that anyday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,083,618 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by CouponJack View Post
There will people who "beat" the market but unfortunately those are far and few inbetween (after taxes and costs).
This is just more dogma, you have no idea how many individuals end up beating the market. But more importantly, whether 10%, 20%, etc people beat the market is fairly irrelevant. The more interesting question here whether or not the people that do beat the market have any common attributes, etc.

Another thing that amuses me about this line of thought is that it applies to business as well, namely that most people that start businesses end up not succeeding. Yet.....what would happen if nobody started businesses? There would be no economy. Interestingly as well is that the fewer people that go into business the more opportunity there is in business!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CouponJack View Post
If I have a diversified portfolio of low cost investments tailored to my risk tolerance, I will come out ahead over the vast majority of investors who gamble w/an undiversified portfolio.
Who cares? That isn't the relevant comparison even if true (which you are just assuming is true), the real question is whether you would be better off doing your "diversified portfolio, etc" gimmick or trading/investing in a more serious fashion.

You're filled with shibboleths and dogma...and ironically believe that your particular speculation on the markets it the correct one and others are wrong. That is, you fundamentally fail to realize that you're making the same sort of market speculations that traders and investors are doing, its just that the latter group is aware of such.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top