Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-03-2021, 08:57 AM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,639,469 times
Reputation: 18905

Advertisements

It is just a proposal, of course. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-MA, has proposed a new tax with a catch phrase, "it's just 2 cents". Rather than an income tax, it is a proposed annual wealth tax on all wealth over $50 million in assets - but it has the effect of an income tax increase.

For example, someone buys a $100,000 bond @ 100 with a 3% coupon.

Annual Return: $3,000
Wealth Tax on the Gain: $2,000

Effective Tax Rate: 67%

(source: CNBC)

For billionaires, the effective tax rate could be over 100% once you add in all other Federal, State & Local taxes.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-03-2021, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
2,525 posts, read 1,944,675 times
Reputation: 4968
Lizzie Warren proposed a Tax,
And gave the rich folk 2% whacks.
When she saw what she had done,
She gave the Billionaires an extra One.

Her campaign slogan of 'just 2 cents' is disingenuous and shoots a hole in her proposal. It's not just 2 cents.....it's 2% of $50 Million, which is a cool Mill. Every Year. For 10 Years.

There is a better way to generate revenue. Simply repeal the previous Tax Cuts for High Earners, which had very little trickle-down effect. The Taxes collected should be earmarked for stimulative spending, such as Infrastructure and Clean Energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 09:19 AM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,211,328 times
Reputation: 18170
I'm wondering about people whose $50 MM+ net worth is primarily illiquid; in stock or business ownership or land. They might not have the cash around to pay the tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 09:23 AM
 
2,746 posts, read 1,779,432 times
Reputation: 4438
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1insider View Post
I'm wondering about people whose $50 MM+ net worth is primarily illiquid; in stock or business ownership or land. They might not have the cash around to pay the tax.
Tillman Fertita was on CNBC yesterday discussing this very issue. First hurdle to get over is valuation. As he said, he could have each of the Big 4 accounting firms audit his balance sheet and they'd all have different numbers. Then you have the liquidity issue.

Just shows that Warren has no common sense when it comes to this proposal, it's just a good sound bite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 09:45 AM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,208,437 times
Reputation: 3632
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveLoaves View Post
Lizzie Warren proposed a Tax,
And gave the rich folk 2% whacks.
When she saw what she had done,
She gave the Billionaires an extra One.

Her campaign slogan of 'just 2 cents' is disingenuous and shoots a hole in her proposal. It's not just 2 cents.....it's 2% of $50 Million, which is a cool Mill. Every Year. For 10 Years.

There is a better way to generate revenue. Simply repeal the previous Tax Cuts for High Earners, which had very little trickle-down effect. The Taxes collected should be earmarked for stimulative spending, such as Infrastructure and Clean Energy.
The 2% is only on every dollar above $50 million, not including the first $50 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 09:48 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,013,844 times
Reputation: 8567
She does this all the time.

Every time; I give it zero thought. Isn’t going anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 09:58 AM
 
602 posts, read 287,944 times
Reputation: 520
The 2% wealth tax I assume would be applied annually to all of the person's holdings above $50 million. This means if a person leaves their money invested, whether in stocks, bonds, commodities, or real estate, they would get re-taxed every year on the same money. This would force them to sell assets in order to pay more taxes, which would be counter-productive and very costly. I also assume the same investors would need to pay capital gains taxes upon sale of the assets, which would be in addition to the 2%. Under the current system you only pay taxes on gains upon sale of the asset. As long as you buy and hold, you don't pay taxes.

I'm all for the rich paying higher taxes, but a wealth tax is a terrible plan. I listened to Leon Cooperman on CNBC and agreed with him for the most part. The current system is fine, just that we allow billionaires to use too many loopholes. We could instead raise the tax rate without significantly disrupting things to generate more revenue. Where Leon goes off the rails is when he pontificates endlessly on how great Carl Icahn and the other hedge fund billionaires are. Just stop Leon!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 10:22 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,155,879 times
Reputation: 55000
She will make a million CPA's and Tax Attorneys very wealthy and not accomplish jack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 10:31 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
She will make a million CPA's and Tax Attorneys very wealthy and not accomplish jack.
Yes, this. People don't become millionaires because they are stupid. They will find ways to get around this. Some of that might actually benefit others, but the proposed revenue from this tax would not be nearly what she expects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 11:08 AM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,427,522 times
Reputation: 13442
Quote:
Originally Posted by RationalExpectations View Post
It is just a proposal, of course. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-MA, has proposed a new tax with a catch phrase, "it's just 2 cents". Rather than an income tax, it is a proposed annual wealth tax on all wealth over $50 million in assets - but it has the effect of an income tax increase.

For example, someone buys a $100,000 bond @ 100 with a 3% coupon.

Annual Return: $3,000
Wealth Tax on the Gain: $2,000

Effective Tax Rate: 67%

(source: CNBC)

For billionaires, the effective tax rate could be over 100% once you add in all other Federal, State & Local taxes.

I just googled it and apparently there are 211,000 people in the entire world with $30 million+ of net worth deemed as ultra high net worth individuals.

Let’s just say half are in the United States...let’s say of those another 20% are over 30 but under 50 million.

Her plan is to tax 80,000ish people 1 or so million a year?

Pissing in the ocean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top