Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2024, 04:34 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,572,016 times
Reputation: 22772

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by treasurekidd View Post
Emphasis on “margin account” and “your stocks.” You do realize that when you’re using margin, you’re using money borrowed from the broker, so whatever is in your margin account isn’t really yours to begin with. Simple solution, don’t use margin.
And if you have a cash basis account your holdings wouldn’t won’t by rehypothicated
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2024, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Shawnee-on-Delaware, PA
8,055 posts, read 7,422,895 times
Reputation: 16314
I thought the brokers were making money on Zero Commission deals by giving me "poor execution", skimming fractions of pennies on every share, Office Space style. I mean, I knew I was paying the piper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 01:28 AM
 
106,594 posts, read 108,739,314 times
Reputation: 80086
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtab4994 View Post
I thought the brokers were making money on Zero Commission deals by giving me "poor execution", skimming fractions of pennies on every share, Office Space style. I mean, I knew I was paying the piper.
if you enter a limit order that’s your price commission paying or not
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 05:38 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,856,260 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Florida2014 View Post
I've never heard this before. Sounds conspiracy-ish to me. My money is digital in my bank, doesn't mean it's the bank's money. FDIC insures it up to a certain dollar amount.

Also, if that's true, what about real estate? I don't physically hold it either, does that mean some banker can just take my house?
Are you physically in your house? Do you own firearms, or any weapon for that matter? then yes you are physically holding your property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 05:47 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,856,260 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAZ View Post
It’s because brokers are selling you securities they don’t actually own. From Susanne Trimbath, a former insider at the DTCC:

https://youtu.be/SutU5vXcIrs?si=bR4Ad24bT6HMRYmw

At 24 min she says it out loud, retail investors are simps, chattel in what looks like a multi-trillion dollar Ponzi foisted by the big banks and Wall Street firms. Don’t worry though, the music is still playing and even if it stops, that SIPC insurance will protect you…
Your getting the convenience of stock trading from home on your laptop, with no fee's to boot. I don't care how they make their money, it's worth it to me.

Now if the whole system falls apart then yes maybe i will lose my shares. But then again if it all falls apart I will be far more concerned about if I have enough beans and ammo then what happened to my stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 05:59 AM
 
5,149 posts, read 3,078,346 times
Reputation: 11034
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrat View Post
Your getting the convenience of stock trading from home on your laptop, with no fee's to boot. I don't care how they make their money, it's worth it to me.

Now if the whole system falls apart then yes maybe i will lose my shares. But then again if it all falls apart I will be far more concerned about if I have enough beans and ammo then what happened to my stocks.
How does that work out in the larger sense? If someone lives in a neighborhood run by Mafia thugs who steal and kill, it’s OK to ignore their crimes if that person is not directly bothered by thugs? Nihilism is the answer, the way forward?

Maybe that’s the way those happy, “grass fed” cows feel right before the big truck pulls up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 06:29 AM
 
4,416 posts, read 2,938,422 times
Reputation: 6056
Quote:
Originally Posted by treasurekidd View Post
Emphasis on “margin account” and “your stocks.” You do realize that when you’re using margin, you’re using money borrowed from the broker, so whatever is in your margin account isn’t really yours to begin with. Simple solution, don’t use margin.
The OP doesn't even understand what margin or broker means. He's just so proud of himself thinking him and some youtuber figured out some scam in the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 06:35 AM
 
4,416 posts, read 2,938,422 times
Reputation: 6056
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAZ View Post
Yes it was too easy lol. From your first link:

”Investors can now trade stocks for free through most brokers. But how do brokerages make money if they’re waiving commissions? A deep dive into the commission-free trading movement reveals various business activities that build profits, sometimes to the disadvantage of clients.”

Rehypothecation occurs in a margin account when the broker-dealer uses an asset—stock securities in this case—as collateral to fulfill their own obligations or interests. In other words, they can fund their own market bets or borrow money from a bank, using your stocks as collateral if things go haywire. This practice tends to work well in quiet times. On the other hand, it can have disastrous consequences when the financial system is under stress.”


When the service is free, the product is you. DTCC and the SEC turn a blind eye to naked shorts, failures to settle, and a host of other malfeasance which are funded by “liquidity” from retail stooges. But hey, anything goes these days.
Okay. So during the great financial crisis and covid crash did anyone lose their money in these accounts from what you described??? Did anything you describe happen? I had my money in etrade and nothing of the sort happened. Although I wasn't in margin accounts. I hope you realize if you have all your money in gold bars hiding in your closet or buried in your back yard that can be stolen as well. I hope you also realized that money stored in bank accounts is loaned out by banks for mortgages etc, so that isn't even setting there for your to take out. There is no 100% risk free way to store your money.

Last edited by Berteau; 03-15-2024 at 07:01 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 09:08 AM
 
5,149 posts, read 3,078,346 times
Reputation: 11034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berteau View Post
Okay. So during the great financial crisis and covid crash did anyone lose their money in these accounts from what you described??? Did anything you describe happen? I had my money in etrade and nothing of the sort happened. Although I wasn't in margin accounts. I hope you realize if you have all your money in gold bars hiding in your closet or buried in your back yard that can be stolen as well. I hope you also realized that money stored in bank accounts is loaned out by banks for mortgages etc, so that isn't even setting there for your to take out. There is no 100% risk free way to store your money.
No, my accounts didn’t lose any “money”, but that’s not my point. Sure, we are all covered by SIPC’s notional “insurance”, even though they would likely require a bailout if a financial crisis required significant payouts. The point is the securities assets of retail investors are treated as a slush fund. When Black Rock buys $1B of IBM shares, that transaction is treated differently than when Ma Kettle buys 100 shares of IBM for her IRA. One is an actual transfer of shares and voting rights, the other is an entry on a spreadsheet (cynically called the “black hole” at DTCC). It’s not the way “fair and efficient” markets are supposed to operate under the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2024, 11:09 AM
 
4,416 posts, read 2,938,422 times
Reputation: 6056
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAZ View Post
No, my accounts didn’t lose any “money”, but that’s not my point. Sure, we are all covered by SIPC’s notional “insurance”, even though they would likely require a bailout if a financial crisis required significant payouts. The point is the securities assets of retail investors are treated as a slush fund. When Black Rock buys $1B of IBM shares, that transaction is treated differently than when Ma Kettle buys 100 shares of IBM for her IRA. One is an actual transfer of shares and voting rights, the other is an entry on a spreadsheet (cynically called the “black hole” at DTCC). It’s not the way “fair and efficient” markets are supposed to operate under the law.
And if they weren't treated as a "slush fund" as you describe it, they would have to make a profit by having large trading fees. They're a business meant to make a profit. They will get their profit one way or another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top