U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Iowa
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-29-2010, 04:27 AM
 
135 posts, read 360,595 times
Reputation: 106

Advertisements

Red Light Camera Studies Show They Increase Accidents

"The preponderance of independent research (in other words, research that was not funded by ticket camera vendors or units of government interested in justifying camera-based traffic enforcement) has illustrated that ticket cameras typically increase, not decrease, the number of accidents at controlled intersections."


"A local TV station fact-checked the city's claims that their ticket cameras reduced accidents and found that the opposite was true. At 20 of the 32 intersections studied, accidents increased and several intersections tripled their accident rate."


"The Virginia Transportation Research Council released a report expanding upon earlier research into the safety effects of red light cameras in Virginia. It showed an overall increase in crashes after cameras were installed."


"A study prepared by the North Carolina A&T State University found that red-light cameras increased the number of accidents at intersections."



Red Light Camera Studies

http://www.motorists.org/red-light-cameras/
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-02-2010, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Southern Yavapai County
1,329 posts, read 3,120,285 times
Reputation: 698
Los Angeles has recently completed a study of red light cameras that showed inconclusive results on both safety and revenue. It seems that the only real benefit of red light cameras is to the companies operating them. Most of the offenders were those who did not make a complete stop before making a right turn. This is not a big safety issue. The safety issue is high speed red light running, which is rare, but often devastating. Usually a drunk, BTW, which brings up the advantage of a police patrol over a camera. Cops are good at spotting drunks. Cameras are not.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2010, 04:32 PM
 
135 posts, read 360,595 times
Reputation: 106
From "the camera never lies" file.


Speeding enforcement camera catches the wrong culprit


•Sonia Nano has never been to Sangamon County.

•She does not own a 2005 Nissan.

•She in no way, shape or form looks like the woman caught on camera May 25 speeding through a construction zone on Interstate 55.

So the Chicago resident was more than a little confounded to learn she was issued a ticket for driving 62 miles per hour in a 45 mph work zone.

"It is a very, very, very bizarre situation," Nano said. "If it didn't happen to me, I would never have believed it."

Speeding enforcement camera catches the wrong culprit - chicagotribune.com

Just think of it as a speed tax Honey, and remember , "its for the children".
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2010, 09:17 PM
 
10 posts, read 144,548 times
Reputation: 17
Default Camera Opinion

CR area people do have a problem with running red lights and not signaling in general so I'm on the fence with the cameras. What appalls me is that the city allows 30% of the revenue generated by these cameras to be paid to the 3rd party that "owns" the cameras. I see this as an ethical issue allowing taxation of the residents without approval by the residents. What percentage would enrage residents? 50%, 60%, 70%? When you hear of the revenue that these things generate, the numbers are staggering... I need one in my front yard...

For those of you that travel the I380, wait until they sync those things at every ramp and exit so they calculate your average speed between points. Your mean speed better be less than 76mph!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2010, 12:00 AM
 
Location: Sarasota FL
6,864 posts, read 10,104,325 times
Reputation: 6624
But folks, don't you know that revenue cameras, I mean red light cameras are for safety?
Not only are the private companies operating the systems raking in millions of dollars, they reduce the states recommended 'yellow' time on the traffic light to make even more money. [a federal study of red light running concluded that if 1 second was added to the 'yellow' time, red light running would be reduced by 90%] Revenue camera placements aren't selected by the amount of vehicle crashes at an intersection, they are installed at intersections that will make the most money. And your local politicians and county traffic engineer is complicit in this sham.
btw- watch for the increase in rear end collisions where ever a revenue camera is installed.

Last edited by d4g4m; 10-19-2010 at 12:08 AM..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2010, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Scott County, IA
509 posts, read 1,051,108 times
Reputation: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuadCityImages View Post
Red light cameras at every intersection are fine with me. Speed cameras don't bother me either, although putting them on the interstate, as they're doing on I-380, might be going a little bit too far. Don't break the law and you won't get caught.

The reason people hate these is because they think that cops at least give them a sporting chance to get away with stuff, whereas cameras are "unfair."
I sometimes wish that I had a lightsaber so I could jump out of my truck and topple the posts that the cameras are perched atop. Only sometimes though.

I think I could run for Scott county sheriff and win on the grounds that I would get rid of all speed/light cameras in the quad cities (even though I have no law enforcement experience). People do not like these things.

I am actually suprised that some political action group has not put forth a "public measure" or proposition to remove them now and forever. I would be extraordinarily suprised if folks would elect to keep the cameras on a straight yes or no vote.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2010, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Wishing It Was Wisconsin
534 posts, read 1,473,052 times
Reputation: 877
I am not one to run red lights but I can understand why people do it. Hardly any of the lights sync with each other. Nothing like getting a green light and having to stop at the next one a hundred feet away, While the one you just made is still green. Plus, half the lights in this city should be flashing yellow by about 9pm and they aren't.

I think the red light cameras are stupid and for a city that has no money, it's a waste. It's just less work for the most lazy PD department to do...
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2010, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Marion, IA
2,796 posts, read 5,659,563 times
Reputation: 1584
My thoughts are: Slow down to 55mph 500 feet before, and hit the gas when they pass. What a stupid way to control speeders. Oh well buying crap like this keeps those inflated state budgets going so they're approved for more waste next year.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2010, 10:35 PM
 
28 posts, read 36,864 times
Reputation: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercruiserdr View Post
Think about it peeps !



Also bear in mind that using these cameras denies those accused of a crime the right to face their accusers in court , one of the basic fundamentals of our legal system.
If the picture indicates you are guilty you have to pay,, CASE CLOSED !


Sorry....use of these cameras does not deny anyone the right to face their accuser.... any person who recieves a traffic violation ALWAYS has the right to face their accuser in court which is, as you say, one of the most basic tenets of our legal system. . ..
. . . .. . ...you still have that right .. . DEMAND IT. . . the problem becomes the city's when they cannot produce the individual who can produce anything but hearsay evidence. ..which is inadmissable in our court system .. .

..and it really begins when you are informed that, rather than a trial, you can protest your innocence at an administrative hearing. . .where nice men in blue uniforms will happily assist you in leaving town with a lighter wallet. .. ..all the while not telling you that you didn't need to give up your rights at the door at all .. . . .because if they did tell you that . . .then no one would pay the fees this revenue raising scam is bringing the fair city of Cedar rapids.. ..


. . PAY ATTENTION .. . KNOW YOUR RIGHTS . . ..DO NOT PAY THESE TICKETS . .. .STOP GIVING YOUR MONEY AWAY. ..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Iowa
408 posts, read 730,238 times
Reputation: 243
The main thing that bothers me is when you're on 380 and there are clusters of cars...personally, I would rather be ahead of the crowd instead of all grouped together. I know where all the red cameras are...usually just slow down when I know they're coming, I don't speed excessively but I don't drive 55 anywhere.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Iowa
View detailed profiles of:
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 AM.

© 2005-2020, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top