Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Job Search
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-16-2013, 07:25 AM
 
Location: broke leftist craphole Illizuela
10,326 posts, read 17,420,544 times
Reputation: 20337

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnytang24 View Post
The Wonderlic is a basic math skills test.
Except the aggressive time limit that causes few to be able to finish make it into a quasi-IQ test and other variables other than the ability to do math are introduced such as I mentioned exposure, test taking stategies etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2013, 08:52 AM
 
Location: broke leftist craphole Illizuela
10,326 posts, read 17,420,544 times
Reputation: 20337
Quote:
Originally Posted by spencgr View Post
Taking these tests is not simply about the math. It is about finding the candidates with good prioritization and time management skills- compeltely relevant skills for any job.
Using this crude test to measure that is like using a barometer and thermometer to make a 5 day forecast. It requires a total leap of logic to the point where it is Non sequitur. Something with the rubber ball analogy. Saying it shows how a candidate deals with curve balls is just a twisted stretch of logic. The ideal candidate's response should be to walk out of the interview and let you hire a clown.

The hiring process just seems to be where logic goes to die.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 09:13 AM
 
9,875 posts, read 14,112,458 times
Reputation: 21767
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSchemist80 View Post
Using this crude test to measure that is like using a barometer and thermometer to make a 5 day forecast. It requires a total leap of logic to the point where it is Non sequitur. Something with the rubber ball analogy. Saying it shows how a candidate deals with curve balls is just a twisted stretch of logic. The ideal candidate's response should be to walk out of the interview and let you hire a clown.

The hiring process just seems to be where logic goes to die.
Just curious, how do you measure a candidate's time management and prioritization skills?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 10:50 AM
 
3,041 posts, read 4,998,632 times
Reputation: 3323
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSchemist80 View Post
Except the aggressive time limit that causes few to be able to finish make it into a quasi-IQ test and other variables other than the ability to do math are introduced such as I mentioned exposure, test taking stategies etc.
Sorry, but the Wonderlic is trivially easy to finish within the allotted time even for someone, like me, of average intelligence.


Some people want to see how fast people can work. Some give tests specific to a knowledge area. Some are to see learning ability. Whether it's relevant or not is dependent on a number of things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 12:24 PM
 
Location: broke leftist craphole Illizuela
10,326 posts, read 17,420,544 times
Reputation: 20337
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnytang24 View Post
Sorry, but the Wonderlic is trivially easy to finish within the allotted time even for someone, like me, of average intelligence.


Some people want to see how fast people can work. Some give tests specific to a knowledge area. Some are to see learning ability. Whether it's relevant or not is dependent on a number of things.
From the Wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonderlic_Test
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Regarding the time allotted to take the test, Eldon F. Wonderlic, in an article released in 1939, stated the following: "The length of the test was made such that only about two to five per cent of average groups complete the test in the twelve-minute time limit."
The median score in most white collar professions is upper 20's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 12:31 PM
 
Location: broke leftist craphole Illizuela
10,326 posts, read 17,420,544 times
Reputation: 20337
Quote:
Originally Posted by spencgr View Post
Just curious, how do you measure a candidate's time management and prioritization skills?
I think at some point employers are going to have to come to the realization that candidate success cannot be accurately measured and stop the goofy tests and HR horse crap. Employers are acting like someone with a terminal disease reaching for every form of quackery out there. Candidates are really tired of having quackery forced on them.

A while back a clique of aging people started drinking their own urine convinced it would slow the aging process. I could naturally just wave my hand at them as a bunch kooks but it didn't affect me so let them do it. When they start trying to get you to drink to urine or in the case of employers indulge them in quackery then I get angry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
13,520 posts, read 22,118,032 times
Reputation: 20235
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSchemist80 View Post
From the Wikipedia article
Wonderlic Test - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The median score in most white collar professions is upper 20's
You know that the test has been revised many times since 1939, right? In fact, there are many offshoots designed to measure different things.

In your referenced wikipedia source, you forgot to include:

Quote:
The Wonderlic Test, as a vocational and intelligence test, falls under the field of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. As a personnel test the Wonderlic is used to gauge an applicant's job potential, educational potential, and training potential. ... While there is no lack of tests that could be used in place of the Wonderlic, such as the IQ or the Mechanical Aptitude Test, it is a quick and simple vocational test for personnel recruitment and selection.The Wonderlic Test has been peer reviewed by the American Psychological Association and has been deemed worthy of field applications to the industrial use of personnel testing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 01:37 PM
 
Location: broke leftist craphole Illizuela
10,326 posts, read 17,420,544 times
Reputation: 20337
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaypee View Post
You know that the test has been revised many times since 1939, right? In fact, there are many offshoots designed to measure different things.

In your referenced wikipedia source, you forgot to include:
Yes It is purported and marketed to be a personnel test just like those ridiculous psychometric tests. Just because something is marketed as a personnel test does not make it accurate, useful, or even valid.

The test has been revised many times but the principle is the same. It is a test of basic math, language, and reasoning but crammed into a time frame that the vast majority of test takers (>95%) can not complete it in the time allotted. As it result it does not so much measure math skills, as there would be no need for such an aggressive time limit for that, It is designed to be a quasi, IQ test which is very controversial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 01:45 PM
 
9,875 posts, read 14,112,458 times
Reputation: 21767
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSchemist80 View Post
I think at some point employers are going to have to come to the realization that candidate success cannot be accurately measured and stop the goofy tests and HR horse crap.
How do you assess candidate time management and prioritization skills? How do you assess candidates at all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 02:09 PM
 
Location: broke leftist craphole Illizuela
10,326 posts, read 17,420,544 times
Reputation: 20337
If you want to test candidates you give them a test of skills specific to the job especially in technical professions. You ask them about hypothetical scenarios and such. Other than that you use the interview to show they can present themselves as professionals.

You don't give junk science psychometric tests or this gimicy test and then stretch logic to say it gives a measure of time management and prioritization skills. All this test is is a novel brain teaser gimic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Job Search

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top