Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Judaism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:24 AM
 
4,082 posts, read 5,042,823 times
Reputation: 818

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
I'm curious how you come to this conclusion, if you do not have the benefit of the Oral Torah (and the sages) to help you with your conclusion? You're just a smart guy who knows better than our sages?


7:1 Says: the Hittite, and the Girgas h i t e, and the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;



The 7 nations the Israelites are about to encounter in the conquest of Caanan. This is the story of the conquest and what G-d expected.

 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:32 AM
 
4,729 posts, read 4,364,243 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzymom View Post
7:1 Says: the Hittite, and the Girgas h i t e, and the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;



The 7 nations the Israelites are about to encounter in the conquest of Caanan. This is the story of the conquest and what G-d expected.
Fine you can quote the text, and it appears you even have an opinion on what it means. But how did you two come to a conclusion on what it means? It does not appear (and please correct me if I'm wrong) you used any Jewish sources as a guide. So what was your guide? Your confidence in yourself? A non-Jewish source? Pop culture? Secular academia?

Really, I'm just curious how one knows what anything in the Torah means if they refuse to use the benefit of 2,000 years worth of Jewish commentary?
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:38 AM
 
584 posts, read 597,865 times
Reputation: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawker Soule View Post
Deuteronomy 7:3 does not refer to non-Jewry in general but, rather, to seven very specific peoples occupying "the land that you are about to enter and possess."
I'm curious how you come to this conclusion, if you do not have the benefit of the Oral Torah (and the sages) to help you with your conclusion? You're just a smart guy who knows better than our sages?
Feel free to show me where our sages interpret 7:3 differently. Until then, I'm content with reading 7:3 informed by 7:1-2. You?
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:40 AM
 
584 posts, read 597,865 times
Reputation: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
Fine you can quote the text, and it appears you even have an opinion on what it means. But how did you two come to a conclusion on what it means?
I think it has something to do with reading comprehension and distinguishing between exegesis and eisegesis.
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:44 AM
 
4,729 posts, read 4,364,243 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawker Soule View Post
Feel free to show me where our sages interpret 7:3 differently. Until then, I'm content with reading 7:3 informed by 7:1-2. You?
So you're going to dodge the question and instead send me on a quest for sources to try to derail the question?

Let's try it this way. How about I agree with you on the passage in question and say it's no proof to my point.

Now, what say you on my question for you:

Quote:
But how did you two come to a conclusion on what it means? It does not appear (and please correct me if I'm wrong) you used any Jewish sources as a guide. So what was your guide? Your confidence in yourself? A non-Jewish source? Pop culture? Secular academia?

Really, I'm just curious how one knows what anything in the Torah means if they refuse to use the benefit of 2,000 years worth of Jewish commentary?
Or perhaps you have already answered my question when you said you would use the two previous pesukim as your proof, in other words, your source is yourself.

Do you realize by using yourself as final proof on any halachic matter, you have thrown out the Jewish mesorah. Another way to say that, is that you are now praying to the god of yourself and are denying the Al-Mighty Himself. Just one quick qualifying point for anybody else following along - that's not a classicly Jewish approach to anything, to declare oneself as superior to one's forefathers and religious sages.
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:45 AM
 
584 posts, read 597,865 times
Reputation: 152
By the way, if (as you seem to believe) Deuteronomy 7:3 refers to all goyim, shall we say the same about 7:2. or is that too awkward?
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:47 AM
 
584 posts, read 597,865 times
Reputation: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
So you're going to dodge the question and instead send me on a quest for sources to try to derail the question?

Let's try it this way. How about I agree with you on the passage in question and say it's no proof to my point.

Now, what say you on my question for you:



Or perhaps you have already answered my question when you said you would use the two previous pesukim as your proof, in other words, your source is yourself.

Do you realize by using yourself as final proof on any halachic matter, you have thrown out the Jewish mesorah. Another way to say that, is that you are now praying to the god of yourself and are denying the Al-Mighty Himself. Just one quick qualifying point for anybody else following along - that's not a classicly Jewish approach to anything, to declare oneself as superior to one's forefathers and religious sages.
You're decending into rant and distortion. It's unbecoming. Stop it.
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:48 AM
 
4,729 posts, read 4,364,243 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawker Soule View Post
Feel free to show me where our sages interpret 7:3 differently. Until then, I'm content with reading 7:3 informed by 7:1-2. You?
And BTW, you refused to accept the Talmudic view on those pesukim earlier in this thread, or that the Talmud (our sages) are even a valid source. Now you're calling for me to give an example of the views of our sages? What changed in the last 15 minutes? You wouldn't be playing two sides of the same fence, now would you?
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:57 AM
 
4,082 posts, read 5,042,823 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
Fine you can quote the text, and it appears you even have an opinion on what it means. But how did you two come to a conclusion on what it means? It does not appear (and please correct me if I'm wrong) you used any Jewish sources as a guide. So what was your guide? Your confidence in yourself? A non-Jewish source? Pop culture? Secular academia?

Really, I'm just curious how one knows what anything in the Torah means if they refuse to use the benefit of 2,000 years worth of Jewish commentary?

The quote is not from a non Jewish source but my Hebrew/English Tanakh. I have an opinion based on what it says and it is clear on its meaning.

These is the story of the beginning of the conquest of Caanan and what G-d expected.

Issues found are

1. That Israel is entering a land already inhabited and the risk to the convantantal faith when they enter the land already populated.

2. It is a war of conquest and utter destruction.

Last edited by Jazzymom; 07-03-2012 at 12:12 PM..
 
Old 07-03-2012, 11:57 AM
 
584 posts, read 597,865 times
Reputation: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
And BTW, you refused to accept the Talmudic view ...
... a Talmudic view.


Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
..., or that the Talmud (our sages) are even a valid source.
I never said that. Distortion seems to come easy to you when you're upset.

Quote:
Originally Posted by theflipflop View Post
What changed in the last 15 minutes? You wouldn't be playing two sides of the same fence, now would you?
You're becoming incoherent. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

What I did was read Deuteronomy 7:3 in the context of Deuterony 7:1-2. I'm sorry you find such an approach so difficult to accept. Again, feel free to offer a different interpretation more in line with your bias, but please let us know its basis.

Last edited by Jayhawker Soule; 07-03-2012 at 12:13 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Judaism

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top