Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Kansas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-05-2015, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34058

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katie45 View Post
Tashfeen Malik gained legal permanent resident status in the United States last year, and now we know her intentions. If Syrian refugees are allowed on our soil. . . yes, some may be law abiding people who mean no harm; but there are NO guarantees that ALL of the refugees are that way.
I'm not ready, willing and able to take the chance of more people like Tashfeen Malik entering out country.
The vetting process for a K-1 (spouse/fiancee visa) is far less rigorous than for refugees, not to mention refugees have to stay in 'camps' for 2-3 years before they are approved and it's a real stretch to think a terrorist is willing to give up 2 years of his/her life sitting in a refugee camp so they can get into the US, particularly since refugees aren't even told where they are going until almost the end of the process.

 
Old 12-05-2015, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Kansas
25,961 posts, read 22,120,062 times
Reputation: 26697
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
The vetting process for a K-1 (spouse/fiancee visa) is far less rigorous than for refugees, not to mention refugees have to stay in 'camps' for 2-3 years before they are approved and it's a real stretch to think a terrorist is willing to give up 2 years of his/her life sitting in a refugee camp so they can get into the US, particularly since refugees aren't even told where they are going until almost the end of the process.
I don't care about the vetting. Kansas doesn't have the money or other resources to bring these people who may or may not have terrorist past but working on it for the future. We all know there are more than enough here spread across the country. Supposing these people have the same moral compass as we do is a mistake. The vetting process has "holes".

We don't want in Kansas, a state of Muslim within the state: http://conservativepapers.com/news/2...nclaves-u-s-a/

We don't have the resources in KS to spend on these people in the first place. We have our own problems to deal with. We also have enough crime, disease and bugs due to the illegal population so don't need more of that either!
 
Old 12-05-2015, 09:19 AM
 
13,721 posts, read 19,258,895 times
Reputation: 16971
Quote:
Originally Posted by katie45 View Post
Tashfeen Malik gained legal permanent resident status in the United States last year, and now we know her intentions.

If Syrian refugees are allowed on our soil. . . yes, some may be law abiding people who mean no harm; but there are NO guarantees that ALL of the refugees are that way.

I'm not ready, willing and able to take the chance of more people like Tashfeen Malik entering out country.
And I read that she had been "fully vetted." So when they say the Syrian refugees will be fully vetted, that's not good enough for me.
 
Old 12-05-2015, 09:50 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,720,028 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by katie45 View Post
Tashfeen Malik gained legal permanent resident status in the United States last year, and now we know her intentions.

If Syrian refugees are allowed on our soil. . . yes, some may be law abiding people who mean no harm; but there are NO guarantees that ALL of the refugees are that way.

I'm not ready, willing and able to take the chance of more people like Tashfeen Malik entering out country.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
I don't care about the vetting. Kansas doesn't have the money or other resources to bring these people who may or may not have terrorist past but working on it for the future. We all know there are more than enough here spread across the country. Supposing these people have the same moral compass as we do is a mistake. The vetting process has "holes".

We don't want in Kansas, a state of Muslim within the state: http://conservativepapers.com/news/2...nclaves-u-s-a/

We don't have the resources in KS to spend on these people in the first place. We have our own problems to deal with. We also have enough crime, disease and bugs due to the illegal population so don't need more of that either!
Quote:
Originally Posted by luzianne View Post
And I read that she had been "fully vetted." So when they say the Syrian refugees will be fully vetted, that's not good enough for me.


I don't think this is even debatable in the view of most average Americans....we've seen enough and we've had enough. Unfortunately, the fringe left that controls most of the MSM remains dedicated to diversion from the truth and tries to make it seem otherwise.

Never in our lifetimes has there been a greater need for a leader like Trump to help us re-take the political narrative and our country.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Kansas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top