[countrylv22]

Originally Posted by NLVgal

OK, answer this. A local patient was what would be considered a hermaphrodite, only he/she had no sexual characteristics (usually hermaphrodites have some equipment for both sexes). He / she had no penis. No vagina. No uterus. No ovaries. No testicles. This patient had a urethra (found in both sexes) and that's it.

No, I'm not making this up. When you've been in medicine for a while, you encounter things.

Can you tell me which local judge is qualified to make the decision as to whether this patient could enter into a legal contract with another consenting adult? Does it have to be a man, or a woman? Who makes the rules? The local judge that was just indicted?

What was on his or her birth certificate, it had to say either male or female.
Did this individual have operations to make these changes?

[countrylv22]

Originally Posted by BBMW

Unless the SCOTUS forces them to, there are a number of states that will never have it.

Please tell me which states will never have it. Thanks

[EA]

All states, being bound by the constitution, will have to allow gay marriage.
It's a constitutionally protected right.

If you care so much about it, I'd suggest moving to Africa. You can even participate in public executions like a good christian.

[lvoc]

Originally Posted by countrylv22

What was on his or her birth certificate, it had to say either male or female, that is how you determine it.
Did this individual have operations to make these changes?

You are really not listening. This person was born neither male nor female. It may be possible to make some genetic determination but in some people even those are equivocal.

Sex is a variable where you may get one, two or none or a combination.

A state form has no impact. It is right or wrong or maybe both.

[countrylv22]

Originally Posted by lvoc

You are really not listening. This person was born neither male nor female. It may be possible to make some genetic determination but in some people even those are equivocal.

Sex is a variable where you may get one, two or none or a combination.

A state form has no impact. It is right or wrong or maybe both.

Thanks, I read the post over again, I get it now. But, how often does this happen?

[pommysmommy]

Originally Posted by extremeatheist

All states, being bound by the constitution, will have to allow gay marriage.
It's a constitutionally protected right.

If you care so much about it, I'd suggest moving to Africa. You can even participate in public executions like a good christian.

With all due respect, I don't think someone who identifies himself as an extreme atheist is in a position to decide what does and does not make a person a "good" christian. Our President who claims to be a constitutional scholar has made a mockery of "our constitutional rights".

[countrylv22]

Originally Posted by pommysmommy

With all due respect, I don't think someone who identifies himself as an extreme atheist is in a position to decide what does and does not make a person a "good" christian. Our President who claims to be a constitutional scholar has made a mockery of "our constitutional rights".

Exactly! Thank you. I agree with you.

[EA]

This is not a religious discussion. However, if it were, I'd trounce you with my religious knowledge.

Let's not have this thread closed.
Feel free to dm me.

[pommysmommy]

Originally Posted by extremeatheist

This is not a religious discussion. However, if it were, I'd trounce you with my religious knowledge.

Let's not have this thread closed.
Feel free to dm me.

"Religious" knowledge doesn't qualify you to decide who is and is not a "good" christian when you are an atheist. I think you were the one who introduced religion to the thread.

[observer53]

There are multiple threads already on this issue in the general forums, probably both P and OC and Religion. Take it there if you can't relate the discussion to Nevada, otherwise the thread will be closed.