[SHEPNYC]

Since the Las Vegas primary/caucus is coming up, thought it would be interesting to poll this board and see how accurate it turns out to be.

So is it Barack or Hillary

[smalldog]

I like Hilary. But american people like to select naive people, such as BUSH.

Originally Posted by SHEPNYC

Since the Las Vegas primary/caucus is coming up, thought it would be interesting to poll this board and see how accurate it turns out to be.

So is it Barack or Hillary

[coolricks]

Originally Posted by smalldog

I like Hilary. But american people like to select naive people, such as BUSH.

Dam Right!!!!!, can't believed why on earth they voted for him on a second term

Have you heard the qoute from Hillary she made recently? "Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price."

Isn't that the same reteroic used by Bush????

[Chest Rockwell]

Despite what the media or this thread would tell you, there are three candidates in the Dem race.

[dynimagelv]

I'm confused.....where was Bush mentioned.....the ? was Hillary or obamamama

and I agree.....wherre is Edwards mentioned......I hate loaded polls....

[radraja]

I'd go with Hillary.

Barack seems like a good guy, but far too naive to be president right now. He seems to be living in a fantasy world.

I don't necessarily love her, but Hillary is the only candidate who really knows what she's doing. I also prefer her more realistic approach to things.

[Eric Young]

How 'bout a poll on the size of the poll's margin of error? I'd put it at 15%.

[gulfer]

I'd actually say Obama. The whole Washington so called 'experience' is the main reason people all over the globe dislike our government. Not Americans, but definately the Government.

Wouldn't it be great if we could just flush the whole system and start with our Constitution all over again???

Definately not a fan of the Clinton's. Either way though, at least in January we'll have someone else to play our useless Congress' ineffectiveness on

[jjameson922]

Two issues regarding Hillary: how can any woman have any respect for a woman who put up with a husband who publicly did what he did? Do you think she might be so politically ambitious that respect and integrity meant nothing to her and isn't that a scarey thought to elect a leader for this country who we have seen, will do anything to justify the end?
Secondly, Hillary claims she has "White House" experience. Wouldn't you say the pastry chef does too?

[radraja]

Originally Posted by jjameson922

Two issues regarding Hillary: how can any woman have any respect for a woman who put up with a husband who publicly did what he did? Do you think she might be so politically ambitious that respect and integrity meant nothing to her and isn't that a scarey thought to elect a leader for this country who we have seen, will do anything to justify the end?

Actually, I think she handled the situation in the best possible way. She was upset, but she forgave him and moved on. She didn't bash him or degrade him to media. She showed some class. I don't see how her reaction lacked integrity or proved that she'll "do anything to justify the end" - as far as I'm aware, she didn't actually do anything wrong.

And really, what would be the alternative? Pushing him into a messy divorce and becoming the bitter, angry ex-wife? That would only lead to more negative publicity.

But at any rate, I think it's sad that people take so much stock in their personal lives. A politician's sex life has nothing to do with whether or not they can lead a country effectively. The whole thing should have never been made public to begin with.