Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Here and there, you decide.
12,908 posts, read 27,980,195 times
Reputation: 5056

Advertisements

Index funds are based on the market. It was low in 2005 and did well up to the present. Who is to say that it will continue to do well? Heck I bought sirius xm at 10 cents a share... If I would have kept it till now, I'd be very well off. I sold it at 78 cents. But I paid hefty taxes on the profit. Real estate is a gamble just like anything else. Rent is not. You Lose Every way. And Scoop is correct..The rent includes everything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 16,986,499 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
I was thinking about all of that the other day. I looked at the records for the house we're renting, and the landlord paid $250K for it back in April and is renting it at $1500 to us. I can't see that he's making much by doing so. Is my math off?
Assuming your landlord did a 30-year mortgage with 20% down, his or her mortgage is a little over $1,300 a month. Add in property taxes and put the rest away for maintenance basically you're making the payments for the landlord.

Or if the landlord paid cash, he is making a little more than 7% annual return on an investment where the principal is also currently rising. Landlord could have made more with the right funds. But a long-term 7% really isn't all that bad. And there is little chance of the house pulling an Enron/Lehman/Bear Stearns and becoming worthless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Here and there, you decide.
12,908 posts, read 27,980,195 times
Reputation: 5056
And after the term, the renters bought a house for the landlord. And then some...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
5,314 posts, read 7,781,352 times
Reputation: 3568
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
Assuming your landlord did a 30-year mortgage with 20% down, his or her mortgage is a little over $1,300 a month. Add in property taxes and put the rest away for maintenance basically you're making the payments for the landlord.

Or if the landlord paid cash, he is making a little more than 7% annual return on an investment where the principal is also currently rising. Landlord could have made more with the right funds. But a long-term 7% really isn't all that bad. And there is little chance of the house pulling an Enron/Lehman/Bear Stearns and becoming worthless.
I had calculated about a $1300 mortgage. I guess I wouldn't want to take the risk of renting a house out for no return. I think he overpaid for the place, but that's just me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 16,986,499 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
I think he overpaid for the place, but that's just me.
The landlord isn't paying anything at all. You are. That's the whole point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:36 AM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,549,370 times
Reputation: 1882
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
Assuming your landlord did a 30-year mortgage with 20% down, his or her mortgage is a little over $1,300 a month. Add in property taxes and put the rest away for maintenance basically you're making the payments for the landlord.

Or if the landlord paid cash, he is making a little more than 7% annual return on an investment where the principal is also currently rising. Landlord could have made more with the right funds. But a long-term 7% really isn't all that bad. And there is little chance of the house pulling an Enron/Lehman/Bear Stearns and becoming worthless.
Anything above 5% ROI is good these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:41 AM
 
15,826 posts, read 14,463,105 times
Reputation: 11897
He probably put at least a down payment. If he didn't, the additional interest and PMI are probably putting him cash flow negative. Also, in investment property, the LL is probably carrying a commercial mortgage. These require a larger down payment (25% usually) and higher interest rates (they can be sold off to the gov't sponsored mortgage banks.) If LL bought them on a personal mortgage, he's committing mortgage fraud. Still think he's coming out ahead?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
The landlord isn't paying anything at all. You are. That's the whole point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
5,314 posts, read 7,781,352 times
Reputation: 3568
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
The landlord isn't paying anything at all. You are. That's the whole point.
I understand that. But he's not making anything, either. And isn't that the whole point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 11:48 AM
 
15,826 posts, read 14,463,105 times
Reputation: 11897
And the S&P 500 was up 26% last year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
Anything above 5% ROI is good these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 16,986,499 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
I understand that. But he's not making anything, either. And isn't that the whole point?
He's getting a basically free house, paid for with other people's money. Sure, there are other investments that pay better. But you can't live in them. Who here, besides Mr. "New Screen Name Every Other Day," would turn down a free house?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top