Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am not seeing it on the Newsday link but how did they come to the numbers? If this is according to the census and they know how many houses are in an area and then divide the totaled collective household incomes by that number?
Would that explain why a wealthy area that has second homes is coming in so low? The empty houses with zero incomes would drag down the average.
I am not seeing it on the Newsday link but how did they come to the numbers? If this is according to the census and they know how many houses are in an area and then divide the totaled collective household incomes by that number?
Would that explain why a wealthy area that has second homes is coming in so low? The empty houses with zero incomes would drag down the average.
Its based off the Census Bureau's American Community Survey.
The 2nd homes won't be counted as zero, so they won't bring down the average or anything like that. However, their incomes aren't taken into consideration.
Out of curiosity how much unreported income do you think is out there?
10%
20%
50%
I think its higher than anyone of us are ready to admit.I think thats evident in the Hamptons numbers here.
Maybe Im wrong.
I wish we taxed spending rather than earnings but thats another disaster.
I probably don't disagree with you in regards to unreported income, however I think the income levels in the Hamptons can pretty much be explained by the fact for many of the wealthy in the Hamptons their primary residence is elsewhere and therefore incomes are counted elsewhere.
I probably don't disagree with you in regards to unreported income, however I think the income levels in the Hamptons can pretty much be explained by the fact for many of the wealthy in the Hamptons their primary residence is elsewhere and therefore incomes are counted elsewhere.
Out of curiosity how much unreported income do you think is out there?
10%
20%
50%
I think its higher than anyone of us are ready to admit.I think thats evident in the Hamptons numbers here.
Maybe Im wrong.
I wish we taxed spending rather than earnings but thats another disaster.
No you don't, a tax on spending sounds great, but would stifle the economy because it would give huge incentives for people to save money and put off consumption. Plus, it would build an even larger black market for goods.
What you should hope for is an increase in taxation of unearned income. In our society, we tax earned income at a ridiculous level and tax unearned income at a very low level. That is why you and I pay income taxes at the level of 38-40% and Warren Buffet pays 19%.
John Stuart Mill, the economist, proposed that two taxes should be the main form of taxation in a society. Taxation on unearned income, or income that he state people earned while they slept. This would include capital gains on stocks and property, dividends, and interest. The other taxation was taxation of a deceased person's estate. They earned it, they get to keep it, but their children only have a fraction of a right to the inheritance. He thought that taxing productive income, that which is earned through working, was counter productive to society. Because, if you tax someone who works, he has less incentive to work.
No you don't, a tax on spending sounds great, but would stifle the economy because it would give huge incentives for people to save money and put off consumption. Plus, it would build an even larger black market for goods.
What you should hope for is an increase in taxation of unearned income. In our society, we tax earned income at a ridiculous level and tax unearned income at a very low level. That is why you and I pay income taxes at the level of 38-40% and Warren Buffet pays 19%.
John Stuart Mill, the economist, proposed that two taxes should be the main form of taxation in a society. Taxation on unearned income, or income that he state people earned while they slept. This would include capital gains on stocks and property, dividends, and interest. The other taxation was taxation of a deceased person's estate. They earned it, they get to keep it, but their children only have a fraction of a right to the inheritance. He thought that taxing productive income, that which is earned through working, was counter productive to society. Because, if you tax someone who works, he has less incentive to work.
I probably don't disagree with you in regards to unreported income, however I think the income levels in the Hamptons can pretty much be explained by the fact for many of the wealthy in the Hamptons their primary residence is elsewhere and therefore incomes are counted elsewhere.
Also, a lot of day laborers and helpers live in the Hamptons, effectively pulling down the median income.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
