Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
understand but why should taxpayers be paying to educate three year old children ? Where does this end ? One day some PHD in education will determine that children can learn at three days old, should we have classrooms for them also?
Where is the parent involvement here ?? Why have kids if you want to farm them out at three years old ?
understand but why should taxpayers be paying to educate three year old children ? Where does this end ? One day some PHD in education will determine that children can learn at three days old, should we have classrooms for them also?
Where is the parent involvement here ?? Why have kids if you want to farm them out at three years old ?
UPK is not for 3 year olds. It is for 4 yr olds. Depending on the district's cutoff, many of the children in UPK may actually be nearly 5 when they start. That would be the case for my daughter (winter bday) but I am sending her to private pre-K instead.
From what I have heard it is to help with readiness for K. Apparently Kindergarten is not what it used to be and some children are not ready to be in the classroom. Some kids will have had school before K and some will not, so it's supposed to even the playing field.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.