Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-29-2010, 12:13 AM
 
Location: United States
199 posts, read 546,626 times
Reputation: 397

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amiekbm View Post
Hah! I am DYING to go back to work. My youngest is three and i've been home freelancing for six years. I'm ready to spend my days with grownups! Somebody else can be the class parent and cub master and costume designer for the school play.

I use to work for a division of WB, so I'm hoping to go back there.

If you can believe it, the car insurance is almost half of what we pay in New Jersey.

Many many thanks for all the places to start looking!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-29-2010, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Arvada, CO
13,827 posts, read 29,939,634 times
Reputation: 14429
Start with Burbank.

I paid $2.49 for gas this morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Hollywood North
428 posts, read 1,184,655 times
Reputation: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeppermintChapstick View Post
What is with people in this thread commenting on this woman's decision to go back to work now that she has a preschooler? She did not ask for opinions or eye rolling emoticons about her choice to work outside the home. She had questions pertaining to housing and employment centres. f you really have a problem with working women, might I suggest a time machine? Jeez I guess women shaming is not dead after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Full Time: N.NJ Part Time: S.CA, ID
6,116 posts, read 12,599,484 times
Reputation: 8687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drowningintherain2 View Post
What is with people in this thread commenting on this woman's decision to go back to work now that she has a preschooler? She did not ask for opinions or eye rolling emoticons about her choice to work outside the home. She had questions pertaining to housing and employment centres. f you really have a problem with working women, might I suggest a time machine? Jeez I guess women shaming is not dead after all.
I'll try to speak to that, since i was one of the people that commented.

Her post seemed to have a tone that she didn't want to work, but had to because of the costs of life in CA. Obviously, I misunderstood, as it sounds like she does, in fact, want to go back to work.

I think assuming people don't like women in the workforce is a bit extreme, and actually slightly obnoxious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:27 PM
 
135 posts, read 285,217 times
Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amiekbm View Post
If you can believe it, the car insurance is almost half of what we pay in New Jersey.
What part of NJ out of curiosity?

Final thoughts on Burbank unless you ask more questions: there really aren't any really bad parts of it, and all of it is pretty accessible.

If Hollywood is important to you, try and position yourself in the southwest corner because Hollywood's a bear to get to -- you have to take the 134W then surface streets to the 101S. If downtown is important to you, anywhere near the 5 is great.

Burbank gets quite beautiful on the E side of the 5 as it goes up into the hills. Of course, it also gets more expensive up there too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Hollywood North
428 posts, read 1,184,655 times
Reputation: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1200RT View Post
I'll try to speak to that, since i was one of the people that commented.

Her post seemed to have a tone that she didn't want to work, but had to because of the costs of life in CA. Obviously, I misunderstood, as it sounds like she does, in fact, want to go back to work.

I think assuming people don't like women in the workforce is a bit extreme, and actually slightly obnoxious.
I did not get the tone that she didn't want to go to work but had to. I was speaking more to the poster above me anyhow who highlighted her post about wanting to go back to work and then put the eye rolling emoticon.
I'm not assunming that people don't want mothers to work, there are plenty of people on city-data saying that very thing....it's not an assumption out of left field, however, if it doesn't describe you no need to take offense.In any event, I'm not trying to hijack this thread, I saw what appeared to me to be judgement of this woman's decision to re-enter the workforce so I commented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Full Time: N.NJ Part Time: S.CA, ID
6,116 posts, read 12,599,484 times
Reputation: 8687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drowningintherain2 View Post
I did not get the tone that she didn't want to go to work but had to.
she said: Although I am a SAHM now, I'll need to go back to work full time soon after the move.

To me, "need' means need. Not:

want to go back to work
plan to go back to work
am excited to go back to work
interested in going back to work
etc, etc.

Look, the point is, no one came out and told he she was making a bad choice by going back to work. Need implies that there is a NEED (in this case, seems financial) for her to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Hollywood North
428 posts, read 1,184,655 times
Reputation: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1200RT View Post
she said: Although I am a SAHM now, I'll need to go back to work full time soon after the move.

To me, "need' means need. Not:

want to go back to work
plan to go back to work
am excited to go back to work
interested in going back to work
etc, etc.

Look, the point is, no one came out and told he she was making a bad choice by going back to work. Need implies that there is a NEED (in this case, seems financial) for her to work.
Fair enough, although she has clarified. You are correct nobody said that she was making a bad choice, however a lot can be infered from something that looks like this when she posted about going back to work. I appreciate you clarifying your positon, I get it. If the poster above me does the same then I'll retract my statement....until then it's still valid based on what that poster highlighted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 05:26 PM
 
15 posts, read 46,049 times
Reputation: 11
I am sorry the thread derailed! Listen, I love being a SAHM/WAHM. I wake up at 4am and work until my husband leaves at 8 and I bring in about a 1/4 of our income. But! Not only am I just about ready to rejoin the workforce, I am ready to leave a bit of the childrearing to the professionals. I only wish I could find a job that was school hours, so I wouldn't have to worry about before and after care for my school aged guys and full time, 11-hours-straight care for my littlest.

LA is fer sure more expensive that northern NJ in many ways. But honestly, I should have gone back to work three years ago instead of having a third. But would I trade in my darling youngest? Never, never.

Moving to LA is a great opportunity for our family. It will hopefully be easier for me to get a job out there, my husband has growth opportunities in his new position in LA, and I hear you all have nice weather out there. And trust me when I say that your opinions and well wishes have made it all the more easier to contemplate this move.

It certainly is a discussion that our country needs to have, the need for flexible working hours, working from home, sharing jobs, for all parents, not just moms. We seem to have been on the verge of it, but then the economy crashed, and it went waaaaay down on the list of things that are important to people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 06:31 PM
 
1,963 posts, read 5,623,003 times
Reputation: 1648
also consider La Crescenta and La Canada/Flintridge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top