U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2014, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,087 posts, read 13,535,786 times
Reputation: 3999

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by True Freedom View Post
I'll agree that increasing density around the Gold Line is better than increasing the density elsewhere; however, I think we need to curb increasing density anywhere for the following reasons:

a) our "usable" transit network is not dense enough to take these new residents all the places they'll need to or want to go. Therefore, the vast majority of these new residents WILL own and use cars. More cars == more congestion. Besides the obvious deleterious effects of increased congestion.. perhaps counter-intuitively, it will also make it more difficult to improve other modes of transport like walking, biking, and rail given our built out environment here. Giving space to other modes, at this point, requires taking away from autos. The more congested it gets, the tougher it is to take away.

b) we already do not have enough water for the residents that live here. Adding more people will only make this worse.
I guess the biggest problem with this mindset is that people are going to continue moving to Los Angeles whether we like it or not. You can't just stop building and assume that population growth will stagnate because there are not new units.

Right now Los Angeles has a massive housing shortage and desperately needs more units. If we put a moratorium on new building, it would simply further exacerbate the rental / home prices we are seeing in our region - which just pushes the working class further and further out into the suburbs (which is much worse for traffic than some additional density near jobs). A huge reason the Westside has such insane congestion is because for the most part, the only people that can live out there are upper-middle-class and above so all of those nannies, gardeners, fast-food workers, grocery store workers, secretaries, assistants, clerical staff, nurses, auto workers, production assistants and more are forced to get in their cars and drive from the South Bay or the Valley.

Of course, it would also help if the developers would actually build some homes within the middle classes' budget and not either low-income housing or high-end luxury rentals. So I will concede that many of my points above are moot until developers actually cater to working and middle class renters and buyers. It seems like 99.99 percent of what is built in Los Angeles is over 2k for a 1 bedroom, which is just not realistic with today's wages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2020, 03:12 AM
 
Location: San Fernando Valley
105 posts, read 192,502 times
Reputation: 50
There are some extreme, extreme, extreme faults with the plan to make Los Angeles like Manhattan and that is all the faults. Seismic faults. Los Angeles is built horizontally due to the faults. I seldom pray but I sure would if it could save Manhattan from massive destruction if a large earthquake were to occur there. If that were to happen there then people would sure regret walking and living high above the ground.

Here in California we appreciate plants and gardens and yards and space. We consider it to be a big disadvantage to be packed together like sardines. We do not enjoy long commute times but many of us do because the space is important to us. We do not want to be compressed together like in Manhattan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2016 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2020, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top