Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-12-2014, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,808 posts, read 11,064,109 times
Reputation: 7995

Advertisements

The city of Los Angeles? Yes. I think of it as flat. The area, no way!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2014, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,859,369 times
Reputation: 3419
LA has a large mountain range within its city limit that essentially divides the city in half. At the foot of the mountain range are LA's famed hills. LA does become flatter outside of these hills that surround the mountains (think Downtown/South/Central/West LA and most of the San Fernando Valley).

Downtown/South/Central/West LA and most of the San Fernando Valley is generally not as hilly as other West Coast cities such as San Francisco or Seattle, but on the other hand, SF and SEA don't have a massive mountain range within city limits like LA.

But I think it's worth mentioning that part of the reason why LA became such a prominent and populated city is because of the abundance of flat, easy-to-develop land so close to the coast within the LA Basin when compared to other West Coast cities like SF and Seattle, which have very complicated geography and limited land space available. LA city planners in the early 1900's didn't have obstacles to overcome like steep hills or water barriers. The only obstacle was planning around the limited water supply. Once water was transported in, it was all history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 04:48 PM
Status: "Save the people of Gaza" (set 6 days ago)
 
Location: St. Louis Park, MN
7,725 posts, read 6,372,496 times
Reputation: 10387
I'm from Miami so anywhre is pretty flat.

EDIT: Oops! Anywhere is pretty, NON-FLAT!

Last edited by Pincho-toot; 12-12-2014 at 04:50 PM.. Reason: mistype
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA (Ladera Heights)
496 posts, read 570,984 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatsbyGatz View Post
LA has a large mountain range within its city limit that essentially divides the city in half. At the foot of the mountain range are LA's famed hills. LA does become flatter outside of these hills that surround the mountains (think Downtown/South/Central/West LA and most of the San Fernando Valley).

Downtown/South/Central/West LA and most of the San Fernando Valley is generally not as hilly as other West Coast cities such as San Francisco or Seattle, but on the other hand, SF and SEA don't have a massive mountain range within city limits like LA.

But I think it's worth mentioning that part of the reason why LA became such a prominent and populated city is because of the abundance of flat, easy-to-develop land so close to the coast within the LA Basin when compared to other West Coast cities like SF and Seattle, which have very complicated geography and limited land space available. LA city planners in the early 1900's didn't have obstacles to overcome like steep hills or water barriers. The only obstacle was planning around the limited water supply. Once water was transported in, it was all history.
you're right! I believe L.A. is the only "major" city with a major mountain range that divides it. (highest peak at approx 10,000 feat at Mt. Baldy.) That's pretty impressive and distinct. Other cities might have mountain ranges, but they are not traversed through to get to other parts of the city like the greater L.A. area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Armsanta Sorad
5,648 posts, read 8,026,717 times
Reputation: 2462
More like hilly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 08:59 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,292,976 times
Reputation: 11039
Anecdote. So I was in Los Feliz with my wife one day. After lunching we felt a little guilty, so we started to head north. There is a trail head in a small park that is like a spur off of Griffith. Started out just a little up grade. And then ... emerging at the crest, we knew we'd done justice to our lunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 09:55 PM
 
Location: La La Land
1,616 posts, read 2,477,842 times
Reputation: 2838
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
Anecdote. So I was in Los Feliz with my wife one day. After lunching we felt a little guilty, so we started to head north. There is a trail head in a small park that is like a spur off of Griffith. Started out just a little up grade. And then ... emerging at the crest, we knew we'd done justice to our lunch.

Was that the one off of Fern Dell Drive that leads up to the observatory? That one almost killed me the first time we did it!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2014, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
2,436 posts, read 2,777,438 times
Reputation: 2284
LA is not flat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2014, 01:29 AM
 
Location: El Sereno, Los Angeles, CA
733 posts, read 934,182 times
Reputation: 428
I'm from the Eastside ain't flat around here, especially Northeast.

South Central aside from Baldwin Hills is fairly long and flat though.

Hills on the westside too, and in Los Feliz and Silverlake and Echo Park iirc.

Maybe those two little neighborhoods west of Pico Union too, that I'm not so sure about though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2014, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,084 posts, read 15,773,176 times
Reputation: 4049
The historic city limits of LA are hilly with DTLA, Echo Park, Westlake, Chinatown, Pico Union all being very hilly.

Silver Lake, Los Feliz, Highland Park, Eagle Rock and other Eastside or Eastside-ish neighborhoods are hilly. Mid City is hilly. On the Westside Mar Vista, Santa Monica, West Los Angeles, Baldwin / Crenshaw areas are hilly.

Lots and lots of non flat neighborhoods. Even Pasadena is relatively hilly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top