Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-28-2017, 04:59 PM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,113,468 times
Reputation: 5667

Advertisements

Urban or suburban? L.A.'s very identity is at stake in the March election - LA Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2017, 04:21 AM
 
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
1,780 posts, read 1,760,758 times
Reputation: 1218
LA's planning process is a mess, to that I can agree. But this measure is disastrous for LA's economy and affordability and clearly is backed by wealthy NIMBY's who are exploiting the poor to push a personal agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2017, 05:35 PM
 
2,088 posts, read 1,972,068 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativeOrange View Post
LA's planning process is a mess, to that I can agree. But this measure is disastrous for LA's economy and affordability and clearly is backed by wealthy NIMBY's who are exploiting the poor to push a personal agenda.
Yeah, my neighborhood is mostly retired or empty nester, wealthy people, and the proponents have been out in force campaigning here. I was doing yard work last weekend and noticed the campaigner only stopped at the houses owned by white people. He only walked up to about 7 houses on my block. He had a list of voters names and he skipped the houses owned by Japanese Americans, Filipino Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Armenian Americans. He came up to me but I told him I thought Measure S is a bad idea. At least in my neighborhood, their target demographic is wealthy white people. Probably not a bad strategy, as that's the group most likely to vote, and the one most in favor of the initiative. Hopefully enough have the good sense to reject it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 10:04 PM
 
2,088 posts, read 1,972,068 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by liberalworldonly View Post
Can be wrong. Those two can very much be white especially the latter.
It was by a voter list with names, not them visualy inspecting the house occupants. When I said they were targeting whites, I meant US born American whites with traditional Northern European surnames and English first names like myself and my neighbors whose houses they walked up to instead of skipping.

My post wasn't looking to start a debate about what groups should technically qualify as white, since race is pretty much a made up thing anyway. I was just surprised when I saw the guy completely skip more than half the houses on my block.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top