Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2017, 02:08 PM
 
1,069 posts, read 1,261,800 times
Reputation: 1521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gomason View Post
Bigger problem is that developers are only building luxury buildings that cost an arm and a leg. They wont build more affordable garden apartments because they wont profit as much.
There's a high break-even point due to overinflated land costs. They'd lose money to build affordable garden apartments; they'd need a subsidy to have incentive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2017, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,602,920 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomason View Post
Bigger problem is that developers are only building luxury buildings that cost an arm and a leg. They wont build more affordable garden apartments because they wont profit as much.
Overregulation, red tape, and ridiculous mandates are the reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,356,919 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Overregulation, red tape, and ridiculous mandates are the reason.
They'd still charge as much as the market would bear - regulations or not. Look at Hong Kong, where just about anything goes - apartments are sky high in price as well as altitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,602,920 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverkris View Post
They'd still charge as much as the market would bear - regulations or not. Look at Hong Kong, where just about anything goes - apartments are sky high in price as well as altitude.
Santa Monica is a special case, given that there is something called an ocean there.

In general though, if regulations were greatly cut back, mandates and red tape done away with, zoning loosened, and both rent control and Prop 13 eliminated, housing would be more affordable. The only thing that works to lower the cost of housing, barring some disaster, is building more of it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 03:39 PM
 
1,069 posts, read 1,261,800 times
Reputation: 1521
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Santa Monica is a special case, given that there is something called an ocean there.

In general though, if regulations were greatly cut back, mandates and red tape done away with, zoning loosened, and both rent control and Prop 13 eliminated, housing would be more affordable. The only thing that works to lower the cost of housing, barring some disaster, is building more of it
Restricting demand to domestic citizens and having normal interest rates would do wonders to lower housing costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,602,920 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSR13 View Post
Restricting demand to domestic citizens and having normal interest rates would do wonders to lower housing costs.
.

Higher taxation for foreigners like in Vancouver, Melbourne, and Washington, DC could have some smaller impact, but that would necessitate getting rid of 13 which will not happen in the immediate future. (Although once Jerry Brown's gone it's only a matter of time.) It doesn't seem to have lowered prices in DC and appears to have had only a small impact in Vancouver, as it's just pushed Asian buyers into the burbs.

Higher property taxes across the board would also lower property values, or at least keep them from rising more.

Agreed about interest rates. If we had interest rates like in the '80s that would help. We're not going to get them from a real estate speculator in the White House, though. For your ideas to be implemented we'd need Bernie Sanders as president or someone like him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Downtown Los Angeles, CA
1,886 posts, read 2,099,341 times
Reputation: 2255
SaMo's affordability problems and SF's affordability problems are one in the same. A finite amount of space confined by water, hills, or highways, high paying jobs, and an NIMBYs crippling the ability to build upwards. Once you've bought something, you just sit an enjoy the appreciation. It's a game of climb up the ladder then pull it up behind you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 05:05 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,398,084 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Santa Monica is a special case, given that there is something called an ocean there.

In general though, if regulations were greatly cut back, mandates and red tape done away with, zoning loosened, and both rent control and Prop 13 eliminated, housing would be more affordable. The only thing that works to lower the cost of housing, barring some disaster, is building more of it
Dream on.

You want to buy, make more money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 05:06 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,398,084 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSR13 View Post
Restricting demand to domestic citizens and having normal interest rates would do wonders to lower housing costs.
Nope at best flatten them. Currently we are at a 20 year low for houses being listed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2017, 05:09 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,398,084 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
.

Higher taxation for foreigners like in Vancouver, Melbourne, and Washington, DC could have some smaller impact, but that would necessitate getting rid of 13 which will not happen in the immediate future. (Although once Jerry Brown's gone it's only a matter of time.) It doesn't seem to have lowered prices in DC and appears to have had only a small impact in Vancouver, as it's just pushed Asian buyers into the burbs.

Higher property taxes across the board would also lower property values, or at least keep them from rising more.

Agreed about interest rates. If we had interest rates like in the '80s that would help. We're not going to get them from a real estate speculator in the White House, though. For your ideas to be implemented we'd need Bernie Sanders as president or someone like him.
Or like Obama, ......... wait they dropped with him too.

Now under Carter they went through the roof and hurt a LOT of people. People could not borrow, so many things they wanted to do they couldn't. And the businesses that offered such services were hurt.

You want to buy a house make more money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top