Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-31-2009, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Spain
1,854 posts, read 4,919,196 times
Reputation: 973

Advertisements

What do you think is in store for L.A. in the near future?

I think there are a few worrisome signs, but what effect do you think they will have on the quality of life?

1. Economics. Companies like Hilton Hotels are being drawn out of the metro area to other cities around the country that are friendlier to big businesses and offer tax incentives. This is even happening in the city's bread-and-butter: film production is being drawn to New Mexico and other places where it's cheaper to operate. From what I've learned, the aerospace industry left in the 1990's, what next?

2. Immigration. It's annoying to me that we can't come up with a definitive answer to the question of whether or not illegal immigrants hurt the economy. But from what I understand (I live in L.A. most of the year, but am not a native Angeleno) illegal immigration has wreaked havoc on the public school and health care systems in the L.A. area. What will be done about this in the future? Nothing? What are the consequences of unchecked illegal immigrants pouring into the city?

3. Water and the environment in general. Drought is already causing water shortages in the area, and I believe they have now started rationing it. Again, this seems to be a result of ridiculous overpopulation and sprawl both of which contribute to water shortages and pollution in general.

Do you think the next 50 years look promising for Los Angeles or worrisome? Feel free to discuss other areas of concern I left out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2009, 09:25 PM
 
1,714 posts, read 6,052,894 times
Reputation: 696
We're not supposed to be discussing your #2 topic.

As for water and economics, we probably could use a new paradigm for both. Some of us will need to get busy and make it happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 09:46 PM
 
60 posts, read 241,623 times
Reputation: 57
Yes, I am worried. #2 is making the good American hispanics look bad. real bad.

I'm hoping we'll be ok.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 09:51 PM
 
Location: United States
2,497 posts, read 7,474,533 times
Reputation: 2270
Watch Predator Part 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
2,498 posts, read 11,434,862 times
Reputation: 1619
The economic part is serious. The high cost of operating a business in California is going to send more and more companies to other states. In response to Hilton though: That is not really so much due to the economy of California, but due to Hilton's relationship with the Blackstone Group of NYC. Blackstone wanted Hilton to be closer to them and Hilton is moving to an area known for hospitality. Marriott, Host Hotels, Choice, etc... are all already in the area of Virginia they are moving. That area is big in hospitality just like L.A. is big in movies and the Bay Area is big in tech.

I also think NIMBY's prevent much progress for Los Angeles. I think the NBC West Coast flagship's move to Lankershim and the 5 freeway at the Universal Rail station is an example. This is a big benefit for Los Angeles and the type of development that the city needs, however every time anybody tries to build something nice in the city, somebody has a reason to complain and stop it. Do we want one of the largest television studios to give up on L.A. and move to some other state because we are afraid of new buildings???

Environment: This one is an issue too. Sort of sad to think on average, 58% of the water at a home in So Cal goes to the landscaping. I guess everyone wants a green lawn. In many ways, this is nothing but our own fault. While many Californians are aware of water problems, you still have the idiot on the block who waters down his driveway once a week instead of use a broom.

Last edited by missionhome; 07-31-2009 at 10:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 10:19 PM
 
Location: In a Lonely Place
230 posts, read 599,485 times
Reputation: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX_LAX View Post
What do you think is in store for L.A. in the near future?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 10:51 PM
 
Location: Hollywood Hills
114 posts, read 453,758 times
Reputation: 49
Ha ha! Classic film.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2009, 12:15 AM
 
Location: ?????????????
293 posts, read 893,229 times
Reputation: 280
Talking I'm not worried.

I've seen L.A. rise and fall from time to time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2009, 05:51 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,729,143 times
Reputation: 17831
Tom Petruno's column in this morning's LA Times:

Three things investors can count on when planning for a recovery - Los Angeles Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2009, 08:41 AM
 
Location: West LA
2,318 posts, read 7,842,045 times
Reputation: 1125
Quote:
Originally Posted by missionhome View Post
I also think NIMBY's prevent much progress for Los Angeles. I think the NBC West Coast flagship's move to Lankershim and the 5 freeway at the Universal Rail station is an example. This is a big benefit for Los Angeles and the type of development that the city needs, however every time anybody tries to build something nice in the city, somebody has a reason to complain and stop it. Do we want one of the largest television studios to give up on L.A. and move to some other state because we are afraid of new buildings???
Couldn't agree with you more... rep point coming your way good sir.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top