Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2009, 04:40 AM
 
Location: West Los Angeles and Rancho Palos Verdes
13,583 posts, read 15,649,867 times
Reputation: 14046

Advertisements

From: Gerald A. Silver,
Pres., Homeowners of Encino

To: Parties Interested in Los Angeles City Planning Issues

Subject: #64 PLANNING ISSUES DEBATE

You might want to know about these new mega over-development projects:

THERE IS SIMPLY NOT ENOUGH WATER, SEWAGE, SOLID WASTE CAPACITY, ETC. TO MEET THE NEEDS OF LOS ANGELES!!!
Below is a partial list of new projects being planned all over the City. Each project, when approved, will draw upon the limited infrastructure available to all residents. In a word, it means that you will have to further reduce your water, electricity, solid waste, sewage and transporation consumption. And who is going to pay the increased marginal cost to provide the utilities for these massive new projects?

Will these projects affect every Los Angeles resident negatively? Yes!

For the full list, go to:
Department of City Planning
Select Environmental Notices - then Draft EIRs
(You may also wish to look at the extensive list of Final EIR's on the site.)
All comments must be submitted in writing to the Environmental Review Unit, City of Los Angeles Planning Department, 200 N. Spring, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, California, 90012 by 5:00 p.m. on the final day of the circulation period.

Wilshire Crescent Heights Project


Project Address: 652 -685 ½ S. Crescent Heights Boulevard and 6233-6245 W. Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA


Project Description: The project site is currently developed with a single story, 7,117 square-foot bank, and associated surface parking lot. The Applicant proposes the development of a new 21-story mixed-use commercial and residential tower on the northeast corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Crescent Heights Boulevard, which would total approximately 175,057 square feet of floor area and contain 158 residential units, and 6,850 square feet of ground level retail.



Wilshire Gayley Project

Project Address: 1151-1157 Gayley Avenue and 10951-10955 Wilshire Blvd. Project Description: The Project site consists of two parcels and approximately 23,950 sq. ft. of lot area. The north parcel is zoned C4-2D-O and the south parcel is zoned [Q]C4-2-O. A gas station that occupied the north parcel has been removed and remediation has been completed. The project would require the demolition of an existing one-story commercial building on the south parcel. The Applicant is requesting review of two development options. Option 1 would result in the development of a 134-room luxury business hotel and 10 for sale condominiums. Option 2 would result in the development of 144 condominium units. Both options would have approximately 6,510 square feet of ground floor retail uses. Amenities in both options would include a public restaurant, a coffee shop, a business center with meeting rooms, a swimming pool, a spa, and a fitness center. The building envelope and exterior treatment would be the same for either option. The building, which would contain approximately 303,709 gross square feet of floor area, would be 29 stories and approximately 427 feet in height. Parking would be provided in a four level, approximately 200-space subterranean garage.


Bundy Village and Medical Park

Project Address: 1901,1925, 1933 South Bundy Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90025; and 12333 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90064 Project Description: The proposed project has two components: mixed-use residential and retail development with associated parking on Parcel A, which fronts Bundy Drive; medical offices, and an associated parking area on Parcel B, which fronts Olympic Boulevard. Above-ground and subterranean parking levels would be provided throughout the project site. Parcel A would include the development of approximately 385 dwelling units (comprised of approximately 146 market-rate units for seniors, 62 affordable (moderate income) units for seniors, and 177 unrestricted market-rate units), and approximately 119,838 square feet of retail/commercial space (including approximately 9,500 square feet of restaurant space).

The Wetherly Project


Project Address: 300 & 302, 304 & 306, 312, 316 & 318, and 322 S Wetherly Drive; and 301 & 303, 307, 313, 319, and 321 & 323 S Almont Drive.
Project Description: The approximately 1.285-acre project site is located in the Wilshire community of the City of Los Angeles and is bound by S. Wetherly Drive to the west, W. 3rd Street to the north, S. Almont Drive to the east, and an alley to the south. The Wetherly Project (Proposed Project) would demolish 84 existing apartment and condominium units in seven buildings and construct approximately 132 condominium units in one 16-story building (208 feet tall) and eight townhouse units in a three-story building (35 feet tall). The condominium tower would be approximately 259,716 square feet in total, while the townhomes would be approximately 28,200 square feet in total. Total building area on the project site would be approximately 287,916 square feet.


Archstone Hollywood Mixed-Use Project


Project Address: 6911 & 6931 Santa Monica Blvd., 1125 and 1155 Mansfield Ave., 1120, 1130, and 1150 Orange Dr.
Project Description: Development of 348 apartment units, 40,654 square feet of office uses, and 15,101 square feet of ground floor retail/restaurant space. Parking for 983 cars in one to 1.5 subterranean levels and one level covered at grade. Office uses in free-standing building over one level below-grade parking. Total site development of 445,559 square feet with 2.56:1 FAR. Vehicle access from Mansfield Avenue and Orange Drive. Maximum height 5 stories/65 feet residential, 5 stories/85 feet office.


WestField - Fashion Square


Project Address: 14006 Riverside Drive, Sherman Oaks, California 91423.
Project Description: The Fashion Square Expansion Project is proposed by the Applicant, Sherman Oaks Fashion Associates (an affiliated company of Westfield). The Applicant seeks approval of to expand the existing Fashion Square shopping center on an approximate 28.8-acre site. Implementation of the shopping center expansion project requires a Zone Change to bring the entire site to (T)(Q)C2-1L, a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a “Major Development Project” (MDP) that exceeds the threshold of 100,000 square feet of non-residential development, a Conditional Use Permit for Commercial Corner development, a Zone Variance to deviate from the 45-foot height restriction of the Commercial Corner regulations, a Conditional Use Permit for the on-site sale and consumption of a full line of alcoholic beverages (CUB), and a request for Shared Parking.


Panorama Place Project


Project Address: 14665-14697 W. Roscoe Blvd.
Project Description: The project proposes to develop approximately 504 residential condominium units (approximately 494,360 square feet of residential space) and approximately 452,400 square feet of retail uses (including, but not limited to retail, restaurant, health club and grocery store uses) on an 8.7-acre site within the Panorama City community of the City of Los Angeles.


Metro Universal Project


Project Address: 3875 N. Lankershim Boulevard
Project Description: The Metro Universal Project proposes the development of approximately 1.47 million square foot feet of new commercial and possible residential uses in two phases. Phase 1 would include a 655,200 square-foot office and 315,000 square-foot media production complex with up to 1,929 parking spaces, and a separate parking garage with up to 1,780 parking spaces, which would include park & ride spaces for Metro patrons. Phase 1 would also include up to 25,000 square feet of retail/restaurant facilities. Phase 2 would include a 489,100 square-foot office building or a mixed-use hotel/residential building with 400 residential units, 300 hotel rooms and ancillary meeting rooms, restaurant/lounge areas, spa and residential amenities. Up to 1,467 parking spaces would be provided. The Project would also include new bus drop-off, transfer and layover facilities associated with the Metro Red Line station.





The Bellwood Condo Project


Project Address: 10330 - 10380 Bellwood Ave, Los Angeles Ca 90064
Project Description: The project site presently consists of 26,218 square feet of lot area that is zoned C2-1VL-O and 47,201 square feet of lot area that is zoned R3-1-O, as well as Bellwood Avenue which runs through the project site. The site is currently occupied by 112 apartment units that will be removed as part of the proposed project. The project proposes 158 for-sale flats and townhome units. Pursuant to California State Government Code Section 65915 (a)(b)(1)(B), five percent of the project’s total units are proposed to be set aside for very low income tenants for a period of 30 years. The project's building consists of 210,372 square feet of floor area in one structure comprised of a parking garage with grade-level and subterranean parking, with four residential building elements above.


The Lexington Project


Project Address: 6677 W. Santa Monica Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90038
Project Description: The proposed Lexington Project would include the development of approximately 786 residential units with approximately 22,200 square feet of community-serving retail and restaurant uses. The residential uses would be located within six buildings ranging from five to six stories in height and would include open space and recreational amenities. The community-serving retail and restaurant uses would be located on the ground level along the Santa Monica Boulevard frontage. Additionally, a three level parking facility, providing approximately 1,612 spaces within two subterranean levels and one ground level, would be located below the residential uses. To accommodate the proposed project, existing structures on the site would be removed.



MDR Tower - Vesting Tentative Tract No. 66643


Project Address: : 4363 Lincoln Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90292
Project Description: MDR Tower, LLC is proposing to build a 31-story (366-foot) mixed-use retail and condominium project on a 1.49-gross acre (1.09-net acres) triangular site at 4363 Lincoln Boulevard in the Oxford Triangle portion of the Venice Community Plan area. The project will consist of 158 residential units, including 10% of the units designated as affordable for Very Low-Income households. The for-sale condominiums will consist of a combination of one, two and three-bedroom units. Residents-only amenities will include a fitness center and a recreation deck with pool and spa facilities. There will also be 3,178 square feet of small convenience retail/ commercial space, which will primarily serve Oxford Triangle residents.

Paseo Plaza Hollywood Project


Project Address: 5651 Santa Monica Boulevard
Project Description: Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Zone Change (C4-1VL and R4-1VL to RAS4-1), Zoning Variances (height, Floor Area Ratio, commercial uses below ground floor), Site Plan Review Findings, demolition permit and other applicable administrative and discretionary permits such as haul route, grading and building permits to allow the construction of a 664,440 square foot mixed use project consisting of neighborhood retail and residential components. The Project Site consists of three properties (Site I, II and III). Site I consists of 13 tax parcels that total approximately 212,669 square feet (4.9 acres). The Proposed Project would involve the development of a mixed-use development with approximately 437 residential units, and 377,900 square feet of commercial space (including, but not limited to, retail, restaurant and commercial office uses) on site. Total parking proposed would be 1,811 spaces in three below grade structures.

****
If you would like to share you opinion with others, please email to:

gsilver4@earthlink.net
****

If after reading the above, you may wish to send your opinion to the following:
CONTACT YOUR COUNCILMEMBER AND THE MAYOR

"Councilwoman Janice Hahn" <hahn@council.lacity.org>,
"Councilman Tony Cardenas" <cardenas@council.lacity.org>,
"Councilman Tom LaBonge" <tlabonge@council.lacity.org>,
"Councilman Jose Huizar" <Jose.huizar@lacity.org>,
"Councilman Richard Alarcon" <councilmember.alarcon@lacity.org>,
"Councilwoman Jan Perry" <jperry@council.lacity.org>,
"Councilman Ed Reyes" <councilmember.reyes@lacity.org>,
"Councilman Bernard Parks" <parks@council.lacity.org>,
"Councilman Eric Garcetti" <garcetti@council.lacity.org>,
"Councilman Greig Smith" <smith@council.lacity.org>,
"Councilman Herb Wessen" <councilmember.wesson@lacity.org>
"Councilman Paul Koretz" <paul.koretz@lacity.org>,
"Councilman Dennis Zine" <zine@council.lacity.org>,
"CD 2 seat open" [formerly Greuel]
"Councilman Bill Rosendahl" <councilman.rosendahl@lacity.org>,
"Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa" mayor@lacity.org,
"S. Gail Goldberg, Planning Director" <gail.goldberg@lacity.org>
************************************************** *************************

**NOTICE: In accordance with 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.**

If you would like to be removed from this email list, please contact:
gsilver4@earthlink.net

Thank you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2009, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,330,688 times
Reputation: 21891
That was so cool to read about the new construction projects being proposed. Better to level the old buildings and improve the property. I hope everyone will support these projects as they help to improve the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 10:56 AM
 
Location: West LA
2,318 posts, read 7,842,045 times
Reputation: 1125
Lots of exciting new stuff there! Especially the TOD oriented project at Lankershim and the Wilshire Gayley project which I believe replaces an abandoned video store. If you're going to oppose development... I'd say it's better to probably pick your battles. To oppose all development is rediculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Madison, WI
1,044 posts, read 2,767,229 times
Reputation: 984
Amazing that more condos are being built in this economy, but that's great news for prospective buyers as more supply = lower prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 12:43 PM
 
Location: NoHo (North Hollywood)
448 posts, read 1,605,424 times
Reputation: 262
Agreed. Many of these developments are going to be a huge welcome to underdeveloped areas: ie Panorama City. To say all development is wrong is unwise. I personally am excited to see the Universal Metro project take off. I hope it happens on schedule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 01:07 PM
 
1,465 posts, read 5,145,886 times
Reputation: 861
Some of these look pretty good. I hope we can get the desalinization plants efficient soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
2,498 posts, read 11,434,862 times
Reputation: 1619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exitus Acta Probat View Post
From: Gerald A. Silver,
Pres., Homeowners of Encino

To: Parties Interested in Los Angeles City Planning Issues

Subject: #64 PLANNING ISSUES DEBATE

You might want to know about these new mega over-development projects:

THERE IS SIMPLY NOT ENOUGH WATER, SEWAGE, SOLID WASTE CAPACITY, ETC. TO MEET THE NEEDS OF LOS ANGELES!!!

Something like 60% of the water a average single family home uses goes toward watering GRASS and LANDSCAPING. The developments that were listed are mainly dense condos and apartments which would likely be built right up to the sidewalk and use very little or less landscaping on a per capita basis for its residents as the development will be vertical.

Seeming as Gerald Silver is from Encino, the real people wasting water are all the large single family homes, especially the ones on huge lots, in Encino. 40 single family homes for 120 people in Encino will probably use more water just watering their lawn than one of these new developments that provides a home for 3,000 people.

So maybe we should just destroy Encino and its wasteful yards and built more friendly structures like these.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 03:28 PM
 
Location: West Los Angeles and Rancho Palos Verdes
13,583 posts, read 15,649,867 times
Reputation: 14046
Quote:
Originally Posted by missionhome View Post
Something like 60% of the water a average single family home uses goes toward watering GRASS and LANDSCAPING. The developments that were listed are mainly dense condos and apartments which would likely be built right up to the sidewalk and use very little or less landscaping on a per capita basis for its residents as the development will be vertical.

Seeming as Gerald Silver is from Encino, the real people wasting water are all the large single family homes, especially the ones on huge lots, in Encino. 40 single family homes for 120 people in Encino will probably use more water just watering their lawn than one of these new developments that provides a home for 3,000 people.

So maybe we should just destroy Encino and its wasteful yards and built more friendly structures like these.
And in the meantime, it has been proposed that we reclaim water (i.e. remove the BM's from water and send it back into the "fresh" water supply). And nevermind traffic. Yes indeed, let's just keep stacking as many people as we can into this already overcrowded city -- no problem -- I'll just hop into my flying car (e.g. George Jetson) and simply fly over it all. Yes, let's allow developers to make their profits at the expense of a reduced quality of life for those of us already here, because dammit, if you're opposed you're against freedom and democracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 03:48 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,438,984 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exitus Acta Probat View Post
And in the meantime, it has been proposed that we reclaim water (i.e. remove the BM's from water and send it back into the "fresh" water supply). And nevermind traffic. Yes indeed, let's just keep stacking as many people as we can into this already overcrowded city -- no problem -- I'll just hop into my flying car (e.g. George Jetson) and simply fly over it all. Yes, let's allow developers to make their profits at the expense of a reduced quality of life for those of us already here, because dammit, if you're opposed you're against freedom and democracy.
Money talks. If there weren't a demand, developers wouldn't build because they'd go broke. Of course sometimes big projects can fall victim to bad timing, but over the long haul, there's demand. I wouldn't live in LA because it's already far too dense for my tastes but millions other disagree and even think it's not dense enough. If you don't like the direction LA's headed, there's a lot more cities out there to choose from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 01:36 AM
 
Location: West Los Angeles and Rancho Palos Verdes
13,583 posts, read 15,649,867 times
Reputation: 14046
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
If you don't like the direction LA's headed, there's a lot more cities out there to choose from.
Really? How can you make that statement, knowing next to nothing about me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top