Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-08-2015, 05:48 PM
 
9,094 posts, read 6,317,546 times
Reputation: 12325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shrewsburried View Post
Conversely, there are plenty of people living comfortable upper-middle class lives along 495/3/290 or in Southern NH.
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Yeah and traveling 90 min each way (or so) to work. That comfortable lifestyle is actually, when you examine it, a horrible lifestyle.
I have lived either on the 495 belt or in southern New Hampshire for 10 years now. The only time I had a one way commute approach 90 minutes was the first two years when I lived in Lowell and worked in downtown Boston. The only reason it was 90 minutes was because of the inefficient operation of the Lowell commuter rail line (the stops in Medford & Winchester are too close together and the train cannot get up to proper speed between these three stops). Since I stopped working in Boston, ALL my commutes have been 50 minutes or less one way.

Last edited by AtkinsonDan; 06-08-2015 at 06:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-08-2015, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
6,301 posts, read 9,644,887 times
Reputation: 4798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatsnext75 View Post
Maybe it's time to make all schools top school and not just focus on ones where rich people live.
If people who value education move to a town and stay and raise families there, the quality of the schools will improve in that town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
6,301 posts, read 9,644,887 times
Reputation: 4798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shizim View Post
Street with a double line down the center. Abutting commercial property, next to train tracks (that are still in use), etc.
And yet, there are still people paying top dollar in Waltham and Belmont and other places living with a train right in their backyard. Or people in Newton living close to the Mass Pike. Or people on BeaconHill with Storrow Drive behind them. Doesn't stop any of these places from being quite desirable locations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
6,301 posts, read 9,644,887 times
Reputation: 4798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parsec View Post
I've posted this a few times before, but here's a dirty little secret: all the median household income statistics you find on the internet are wrong. For wealthy towns they are WAY off. They are compiled from census data which is self-reported. Take a look at the IRS statistics which is available on their website.

I picked zip code 02481 which is in Wellesley. The average AGI for the 6,700 tax returns filed from that zip code is $516,291. I guess you can make an argument that median is more accurate than average, but the data is still compelling. $214k of that is W-2 income and $302k is other income such as partnership income (from schedule K-1) and capital gains. When people report their income to the census bureau they usually only include their W-2 income, not their income from trust funds, etc.
I would think too that Brookline is skewed by the student population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 07:18 PM
 
3,268 posts, read 3,323,101 times
Reputation: 2682
Default re

Quote:
Originally Posted by 495neighbor View Post
And yet, there are still people paying top dollar in Waltham and Belmont and other places living with a train right in their backyard. Or people in Newton living close to the Mass Pike. Or people on BeaconHill with Storrow Drive behind them. Doesn't stop any of these places from being quite desirable locations.
Yeah i'm not so sure I agree with the train part. Maybe if it literally runs through your backyard it would be an issue...but there are some people who need the train and might appreciate it being so close. You'd never have to worry about missing it or driving through traffic to get to it. Many areas paint the T as being a reason to move there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 10:35 PM
 
295 posts, read 317,290 times
Reputation: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by 495neighbor View Post
And yet, there are still people paying top dollar in Waltham and Belmont and other places living with a train right in their backyard. Or people in Newton living close to the Mass Pike. Or people on BeaconHill with Storrow Drive behind them. Doesn't stop any of these places from being quite desirable locations.
Right now, anythings goes. A house could be floating on wetlands in Bedford and it could still go for over 50k asking. Doesn't sound very normal to me but in a down or even normal market, fundamentals do matter. There are sone things you can change if you buy a crappy house, like tear it down and rebuild, but to me the following cannot be changed. living next to a highway, train tracks, power wires, flood risk area, main road, cemetery, industrial area, any business or location that can emit an odor, and a mall. Some people find these a plus but I personally dont like to be near any of these for varying reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2015, 03:56 AM
 
Location: North of Boston
560 posts, read 751,772 times
Reputation: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by 495neighbor View Post
And yet, there are still people paying top dollar in Waltham and Belmont and other places living with a train right in their backyard. Or people in Newton living close to the Mass Pike. Or people on BeaconHill with Storrow Drive behind them. Doesn't stop any of these places from being quite desirable locations.
I disagree. The town remains desirable which helps offset the location but the fact remains that it's still significantly less desirable than a similar house on a cul de sac in the same town.

I wouldn't confuse acceptance of poor location (because of an over arching desire to be in said town) with the location being good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2015, 07:15 AM
 
15,798 posts, read 20,504,199 times
Reputation: 20974
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
I couldn't imagine trying to buy into today's metro-Boston housing market on $165K even with a big down payment.

My HH Income is just shy of $200K/year and i'll have a large DP.....and I don't think I can really afford a house inside 128/95 that isn't in a shabby neighborhood unless I want to take on a high mortgage payment...which I don't.





Quote:

Yeah and traveling 90 min each way (or so) to work. That comfortable
lifestyle is actually, when you examine it, a horrible lifestyle.
No, it gets old fast. I've been doing it for 8 years and I need that 3 hours back of commuting time where I could accomplish much more. I've been driving from Boston-area to the suburbs, so this one should be easy to fix.

Last edited by BostonMike7; 06-09-2015 at 07:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2015, 07:18 AM
 
Location: The Moon
1,717 posts, read 1,807,780 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by 495neighbor View Post
And yet, there are still people paying top dollar in Waltham and Belmont and other places living with a train right in their backyard. Or people in Newton living close to the Mass Pike. Or people on BeaconHill with Storrow Drive behind them. Doesn't stop any of these places from being quite desirable locations.
100% true.

When I was house hunting last year there was a place for sale right across the street from my old apartment. The commuter rail passed within 40 feet of the house but it still went for $50k over asking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2015, 07:23 AM
 
Location: North of Boston
560 posts, read 751,772 times
Reputation: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonMike7 View Post
My HH Income is just shy of $200K/year and i'll have a large DP.....and I don't think I can really afford a house inside 128/95 that isn't in a shabby neighborhood.


Kinda sad really. Good think our jobs are outside 128 in N. Mass.
if your jobs are outside 128 you shouldn't even think to look inside.

however with a large downpayment and 200k of income you could easily afford to live inside 128. People are being over the top. just because you cant afford to live in Winchester doesn't mean you cant live inside 128. you could get into Stoneham no problem. or even Melrose/Medford/Wakefield.

i get the feeling that its either "inside 128 in a tier one school" or some combination of "i have to leave Boston all together" / "Its not fair" / "The market is crazy i can't wait for a crash so i can move to Belmont and get a 2500 sqft house on a dead end street for $375k ".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top