Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-27-2018, 05:36 PM
 
3,176 posts, read 3,696,617 times
Reputation: 2676

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
Can 40b have only 20% units affordable and the rest luxury? This setup wouldn't be too bad for home values
What happens is people won't pay the luxury pricing to live near section 8 tenants, and the entire complex usually gets converted to section 8 soon thereafter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2018, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts & Hilton Head, SC
10,018 posts, read 15,662,194 times
Reputation: 8669
People don't want to live next to multi-family developments, regardless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2018, 05:23 AM
 
880 posts, read 819,334 times
Reputation: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dm84 View Post
What happens is people won't pay the luxury pricing to live near section 8 tenants, and the entire complex usually gets converted to section 8 soon thereafter.
This 40b legislation is starting to sound somewhat communist/socialist, wonder how it ever got passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2018, 04:13 AM
 
2 posts, read 1,430 times
Reputation: 10
Thank you all for the feedback. We went to speak with some town officials yesterday and the builder is in the very early stages and haven't submitted anything to the town and actually haven't gone to the state yet for their approval letter. The project is currently a "friendly" 40B and there is a moratorium on expanding the town sewer. They would be able to get a waiver for this but may require other trade offs from the town if they grant this waiver. We also spoke with our real estate attorney yesterday and he said we would have a good amount of leverage in this situation. Again thanks for the feedback.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2018, 06:06 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,957,550 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
This 40b legislation is starting to sound somewhat communist/socialist, wonder how it ever got passed.


Communist or socialist? Two different things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Columbia SC
14,246 posts, read 14,737,232 times
Reputation: 22189
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Communist or socialist? Two different things.
Yes, two very different things and only thought of as the same by those uneducated on the differences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 09:22 AM
 
880 posts, read 819,334 times
Reputation: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by johngolf View Post
Yes, two very different things and only thought of as the same by those uneducated on the differences.
Socialist = forced transfer of wealth from one class to another of lesser means

Communist = forced transfer of wealth to the government and its officials. Central planing


Any better definitions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 10:32 AM
 
3,808 posts, read 3,138,691 times
Reputation: 3333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dm84 View Post
What happens is people won't pay the luxury pricing to live near section 8 tenants, and the entire complex usually gets converted to section 8 soon thereafter.
Saw this play out real time in Lowell. I moved into a 'luxury loft' complex roughly 10 months after it was renovated around 2009. The tenants were largely young working professionals, with a very small minority subsidized. I lived there two years and it was a perfectly fine living situation. Tenants were pleasant, management was professional, and the building was well maintained. I then broke up with my SO, left the building for 20 months, and returned back when my ex had vacated her lease. Upon return, it was quickly apparent the subsidized tenants had gone from a small minority to near parity. Drinking/smoking cigarettes outside the lobby became 'a thing' as did random Tuesday night parties. Fast forward 5 years and my coworker/friend remains in this building and he is now in the small minority of working professionals. Cops have been showing up regularly, one neighbor has some serious substance abuse/domestic abuse issues, another neighbor is clearly dealing heavy narcotics. He says the management is still professional and the building well kept, but the tenant pool is truly dismal - this from someone who lived in fringe Baltimore neighborhoods for 8 years.

In roughly one decade the complex went from 'millenial luxury' to 'public housing'. After living through that transition, I would avoid any large scale apartment complex like the plague.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Needham, MA
8,543 posts, read 14,022,910 times
Reputation: 7934
Personally, I would be looking for a lot more than $20K to grant such an easement. Then, I'd take that money along with whatever cash I can get for my house and I would high tail it out of there. Offering the company building the apartment complex the option to buy your house outright instead of granting them an easement is an interesting idea that I would explore. If the word is out about this building in your town then chances are your property values have already dropped. Did you know about this when you bought the house?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dm84 View Post
What happens is people won't pay the luxury pricing to live near section 8 tenants, and the entire complex usually gets converted to section 8 soon thereafter.
You're painting with a pretty broad brush here. It's pretty bone headed to put up a luxury apartment building in a location that can't support luxury lease rates. It happens though and inevitably the building gets transformed. However, if you put up a luxury apartment building in an area that can support higher lease rates it's unlikely you'll see happen what you describe. It seems in areas like Newton/Wellesley/Needham/etc. there is a never ending stream of divorcees, people between homes, and people renovating/adding on to their current homes which help to fill up these buildings. Not to mention all the folks who want to live in these school districts by any means necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top