Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-14-2021, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Cleveland
4,649 posts, read 4,970,942 times
Reputation: 6013

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
I think you're not reading the graph well, but the original issue wasn't level of covid in wastewater, but community transmission. You said:



I asked for proof of that. You provided "proof" that shows the opposite. Similar spikes, but overall less now, with restaurants, bars, gyms, workplaces (largley) being open. It's showing a lower level of transmission when accounting for the variables including delta and the need for boosters in that timeframe, which one must do.
The graph doesn't show a lower level of anything; it shows a higher level of Sars-Cov-2, in Massachusetts wastewater, year-over-year, for the past four months or so. Is there some misunderstanding about the word "show" means?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2021, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Woburn, MA / W. Hartford, CT
6,122 posts, read 5,090,361 times
Reputation: 4102
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
No, it doesn't. It shows reduced community transmission during a time where bars are open, restaurants open, clubs and gyms and more and more workplaces open, unlike December 2020. It's showing a considerable and impressive reduction in community transmission when comparing apples to apples and taking into account a more transmissible variable and the overlap in the need for boosters when they weren't available yet.
Don't confuse him. Controlled studies are anathema for the deniers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 11:21 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,937 posts, read 36,943,649 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribecavsbrowns View Post
The graph doesn't show a lower level of anything; it shows a higher level of Sars-Cov-2, in Massachusetts wastewater, year-over-year, for the past four months or so. Is there some misunderstanding about the word "show" means?
Yes, there is an inability to understand "show" on your part. You made a claim about community transmission being the same pre shot as to now. I asked for some back up to that. You provided wastewater treatment data which in no way "shows" data backing your claim. At all.

In fact, it shows the opposite. during 12/20 - 2/21, pre shots being made available to most people, we see sustained community transmission during when restaurants, churches, etc were shut down. We see nothing approaching those sustained levels (an indicator of community transmission) now when restaurants (etc) are wide open. That's showing the effectiveness in reducing community transmission of the vaccines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Cleveland
4,649 posts, read 4,970,942 times
Reputation: 6013
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Yes, there is an inability to understand "show" on your part. You made a claim about community transmission being the same pre shot as to now. I asked for some back up to that. You provided wastewater treatment data which in no way "shows" data backing your claim. At all.

In fact, it shows the opposite. during 12/20 - 2/21, pre shots being made available to most people, we see sustained community transmission during when restaurants, churches, etc were shut down. We see nothing approaching those sustained levels (an indicator of community transmission) now when restaurants (etc) are wide open. That's showing the effectiveness in reducing community transmission of the vaccines.
The graph doesn't say anything about restaurants, or churches, or what the standard is for a "sustained level," and it doesn't say anything at all about what late December 2021, January 2022, or February 2022 looks like (because those dates are in the future).

It just says that, continuously since August 2021, levels of Sars-Cov-2 in the wastewater in these parts of Massachusetts were higher than at the same time the previous year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,820 posts, read 22,003,919 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribecavsbrowns View Post
The graph doesn't say anything about restaurants, or churches, or what the standard is for a "sustained level," and it doesn't say anything at all about what late December 2021, January 2022, or February 2022 looks like (because those dates are in the future).
Of course it does! How is it that hard to follow? The samples from early December 2020 were taken during a time when most major COVID restrictions were still in place meaning we reached those high levels back when most places (restaurants, churches, public buildings, stores, etc.) were operating at drastically reduced capacity. Bars were essentially closed (you could not serve alcohol without food). Stadiums and arenas weren't hosting crowds, concerts and shows were shuttered, most movie theaters were closed, indoor play places and facilities were limited or closed entirely, and masks were required just about everywhere.

In December 2021, just about all of those restrictions are gone (masks are still required indoors in some communities). All of those places are open at capacity and many without mask requirements. It's been this way for about 8 months. So when you show wastewater numbers for this December that are comparable to last December's, it's fair to say we've slowed community spread because people are gathering at far greater volumes and in closer quarters than they were at this point in 2020. It's pretty clear. The fact that hospitalizations and deaths are also significantly lower now than in 2020 (and disproportionately higher among the unvaccinated) makes it abundantly obvious that the vaccines are working.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 12:13 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,937 posts, read 36,943,649 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
Of course it does! How is it that hard to follow? The samples from early December 2020 were taken during a time when most major COVID restrictions were still in place meaning we reached those high levels back when most places (restaurants, churches, public buildings, stores, etc.) were operating at drastically reduced capacity. Bars were essentially closed (you could not serve alcohol without food). Stadiums and arenas weren't hosting crowds, concerts and shows were shuttered, most movie theaters were closed, indoor play places and facilities were limited or closed entirely, and masks were required just about everywhere.

In December 2021, just about all of those restrictions are gone (masks are still required indoors in some communities). All of those places are open at capacity and many without mask requirements. It's been this way for about 8 months. So when you show wastewater numbers for this December that are comparable to last December's, it's fair to say we've slowed community spread because people are gathering at far greater volumes and in closer quarters than they were at this point in 2020. It's pretty clear. The fact that hospitalizations and deaths are also significantly lower now than in 2020 (and disproportionately higher among the unvaccinated) makes it abundantly obvious that the vaccines are working.
Right? It's really obvious looking at it.

Also, they aren't that comparable. A blip of a spike is, but the surrounding data isn't... which is again, indicative of lack of sustained community transmission even without the restrictions. It's great news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Cleveland
4,649 posts, read 4,970,942 times
Reputation: 6013
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
Of course it does! How is it that hard to follow? The samples from early December 2020 were taken during a time when most major COVID restrictions were still in place meaning we reached those high levels back when most places (restaurants, churches, public buildings, stores, etc.) were operating at drastically reduced capacity. Bars were essentially closed (you could not serve alcohol without food). Stadiums and arenas weren't hosting crowds, concerts and shows were shuttered, most movie theaters were closed, indoor play places and facilities were limited or closed entirely, and masks were required just about everywhere.

In December 2021, just about all of those restrictions are gone (masks are still required indoors in some communities). All of those places are open at capacity and many without mask requirements. It's been this way for about 8 months. So when you show wastewater numbers for this December that are comparable to last December's, it's fair to say we've slowed community spread because people are gathering at far greater volumes and in closer quarters than they were at this point in 2020. It's pretty clear. The fact that hospitalizations and deaths are also significantly lower now than in 2020 (and disproportionately higher among the unvaccinated) makes it abundantly obvious that the vaccines are working.
I don't know what your standard for "comparable" is, but the 2021 numbers are higher, and not just for December. For August through the present. Is this true, or not? Is this what the graph says, or not? Here it is, one more time, for reference: https://www.mwra.com/biobot/biobotdata.htm

Hint: "It's true, but..." is an acceptable form of response.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 01:50 PM
 
943 posts, read 409,746 times
Reputation: 474
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/14/us/co...ses/index.html
Cornell shutting moving online in the middle of final exams after 500 covid cases within a few days. Omicron surging through the vaccinated campus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,820 posts, read 22,003,919 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribecavsbrowns View Post
I don't know what your standard for "comparable" is, but the 2021 numbers are higher, and not just for December. For August through the present. Is this true, or not? Is this what the graph says, or not? Here it is, one more time, for reference: https://www.mwra.com/biobot/biobotdata.htm

Hint: "It's true, but..." is an acceptable form of response.
Right, but not drastically higher and as has been pointed out before, it's the deaths and hospitalizations that matter much more than the case numbers. Those remain significantly lower, especially so among the vaccinated. All of this within a society that has largely returned to normal (as opposed to being all but locked down at this time last year) is a pretty good indicator of progress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2021, 03:05 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,937 posts, read 36,943,649 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
Right, but not drastically higher and as has been pointed out before, it's the deaths and hospitalizations that matter much more than the case numbers. Those remain significantly lower, especially so among the vaccinated. All of this within a society that has largely returned to normal (as opposed to being all but locked down at this time last year) is a pretty good indicator of progress.
Not higher at all, actually. And the distribution with the important details (we are effectively wide open, vs effectively shut down) shows clear reduction in community transmission, thankfully.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top