Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There are reasons both Twitter and Facebook both declined to re-broadcast the Post's story.
1. There's no proof the man who dropped off the laptop was really Hunter Biden.
2. There's no proof the laptop belonged to Biden.
3. Publishing someone's personal information is a crime.
4. There is a strong possibility this was a planted laptop as part of a disinformation campaign.
The chain of custody of the evidence is highly partisan, including Giuliani. It's tainted evidence.
When you've got proof this evidence is real, then we'll talk.
There are reasons both Twitter and Facebook both declined to re-broadcast the Post's story.
1. There's no proof the man who dropped off the laptop was really Hunter Biden.
2. There's no proof the laptop belonged to Biden.
3. Publishing someone's personal information is a crime.
4. There is a strong possibility this was a planted laptop as part of a disinformation campaign.
The chain of custody of the evidence is highly partisan, including Giuliani. It's tainted evidence.
When you've got proof this evidence is real, then we'll talk.
That isn't their call and where was their investigation into this? They blocked it before their fact checkers even looked at it. So your story is full of holes.
There are reasons both Twitter and Facebook both declined to re-broadcast the Post's story.
1. There's no proof the man who dropped off the laptop was really Hunter Biden.
2. There's no proof the laptop belonged to Biden.
3. Publishing someone's personal information is a crime.
4. There is a strong possibility this was a planted laptop as part of a disinformation campaign.
The chain of custody of the evidence is highly partisan, including Giuliani. It's tainted evidence.
When you've got proof this evidence is real, then we'll talk.
That's funny. The New York Times didn't have the same problem for its report on Trump's tax returns. Why not? The real reason is that are trying to tip the scales and get Biden elected.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
