Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Wisconsin > Milwaukee
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 12-02-2008, 12:12 AM
 
2,507 posts, read 8,559,693 times
Reputation: 877

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MILWCITY View Post
I wish West Allis, St.Francis, Cudahy, South Milwaukee, Butler, Brown Deer, West Milwaukee, Greenfield and Hales Corners were just annexed by the city of Milwaukee. I would also get rid of all 5 counties and just make it one big Milwaukee county. Also I would expand Wales, Caledonia, Racine, Richfield to make them all large suburbs like Germantown. I also would expand all freeways to five lanes in the Milwaukee area and build more freeways as well. I would make one RTA without taxing authority and all bus lines/train lines would expand to all of the area so I wouldn't have to hop on three different bus systems.
I hope none of those planners will listen to you. Why would you go through the work of integrating the Milwaukee transit system and then not give it taxing authority? Expanding every freeway in Milw. would cost billions of dollars, and still wouldn't mitigate congestion as much as a coherent and reliable transit system. Unless you have good public transit, there is little incentive to develop the core city of Milwaukee, add freeways and you will promote further sprawl and disinvestment at the core of the metro area.
Having a single county would be good, but it would be damn near impossible, and would also integrate county services. It is a good idea, but people like their local government. What Milw. needs at minimum is a intercounty planning organization that can usurp the power of individual counties and municipalities. For instance, Racine shouldn't be developed as a suburb because it isits own city. If a rail line linked it to Milwaukee, you could have suburbanesque commuters that would not clog freeways and could live in a small city setting, thus helping to turn around a downtown area that is hurting (to my recollection).
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2008, 08:56 PM
 
Location: East Coast
676 posts, read 960,321 times
Reputation: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by city414 View Post
the bolded
Gary-Chicago-Milwaukee Corridor


It's not much, I'll have to look for more...but it's out there!

oh, don't forget about the plan to extend the Chicago train/subway system to Milwaukee.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 10:05 PM
 
295 posts, read 546,586 times
Reputation: 40
They will never extend chicago cta lines or metra. The plan was close 3yrs ago but Ill backed out of the plan. It's always funny when I meet people from Madison or Green Bay and they say "well isn't Chicago like 2.5hrs from Milwaukee" Thats when I have to explain that from Milwaukee's city limits to Chicago's city limits is only 65 miles and that our suburbs touch. This is also why in 2009 construction starts from ILL to the Mitchell interchange on I-94 will be expanded to 4 lanes each way.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2008, 11:44 AM
 
Location: East Coast
676 posts, read 960,321 times
Reputation: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by MILWCITY View Post
They will never extend chicago cta lines or metra. The plan was close 3yrs ago but Ill backed out of the plan. It's always funny when I meet people from Madison or Green Bay and they say "well isn't Chicago like 2.5hrs from Milwaukee" Thats when I have to explain that from Milwaukee's city limits to Chicago's city limits is only 65 miles and that our suburbs touch. This is also why in 2009 construction starts from ILL to the Mitchell interchange on I-94 will be expanded to 4 lanes each way.
You're right, it's not much of a drive.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Park Rapids
4,361 posts, read 6,528,616 times
Reputation: 5732
Milwaukee and Madison will not "meet-up" anytime soon. Once you exit Waukesha County it's all farm land right up until you hit Madison and her Suburbs.

Oconomowoc is on the leading edge of development heading Westward. The Lake Country region of Waukesha County is the best of the best in Suburban life when you consider Milwaukee.

That is where it ends though, there is no way in my life time or my kids that the gap between Waukesha and Madison will be brought together urban style.

Fear not the developers. Plenty of land for all.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 02:53 PM
 
295 posts, read 546,586 times
Reputation: 40
Yeah I agree, I can see more development going on around the I94 corridor south to Winthrop Harbor. That's why there expanding it to 4 lanes each way next year.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2009, 04:41 PM
 
3 posts, read 3,079 times
Reputation: 15
[quote=claudelle;6166001] Most of Kenosha already commutes to Chicago. /quote]


No. Not by a long shot.
Check this document of 2009 stats. Scroll down to page 2 where it breaks down the # of commuters. 70% of Kenosha County (that includes Pleasant Prairie) works in Kenosha or in Wisconsin.

https://edis.commerce.state.nc.us/do...e/WI/55059.pdf
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 12:44 PM
 
158 posts, read 485,758 times
Reputation: 66
Waukesha county may become pretty urban, Dane county already is,
but Jefferson county never will. It's just too far a commute to either Milw or Madison,
and nothing people would want to endure a long commute for - ie good schools, kettle moraine like woods, etc...
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Mequon, WI
8,289 posts, read 23,098,715 times
Reputation: 5682
Quote:
Waukesha county may become pretty urban, Dane county already is,
I would say they both are, however you get outside of madison and it's all farmville and Waukesha county is turning into just one big subdivision.

Milwaukee County 960,000
Dane County 480,000
Waukesha 390,000
Brown County 230,000


Just curious when they do these county or city populations do they count students as full time residents or are they not counted at all?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/94/Wisconsin_population_map.png (broken link)
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side, Milwaukee
27 posts, read 80,674 times
Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milwaukee City View Post

Just curious when they do these county or city populations do they count students as full time residents or are they not counted at all?
I worked for the Census Bureau this past Spring and can tell you that people are counted where they are living on Census Day (April 1, 2010).

Students are residents of whatever municipality they reside in during the school year (like an other renter). Even if they use their parent's address as a "permanent mailing address," that is not their primary place of residence.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Wisconsin > Milwaukee
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top