Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul
 [Register]
Minneapolis - St. Paul Twin Cities
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2012, 10:02 AM
 
25,847 posts, read 16,525,824 times
Reputation: 16025

Advertisements

I think the Lynx are toying with the other team in the championship here. I expect them to blow them out now two games in a row.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2012, 06:26 AM
 
9,741 posts, read 11,161,033 times
Reputation: 8482
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgal View Post
Right---when I was coaching basketball the 8th grade girls team often handed the boy's team their shorts in our weekly scrimmages...
That makes complete sense because many of the boys could be prepubescent. Once the boys mature and gain their strength, size and speed advantage, it wouldn't be close. The laws of physics are at work here and it should not be up for debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2012, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,922,581 times
Reputation: 16265
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
FYI, the women's Olympic Hockey team that won the gold medal practiced against Warroad's A Bantam team. Bantams are in the 13-15 year old range. I cannot remember who won the game but the boys were much faster.
I think it was the high school team and they played no-checking and the Olympic team lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2012, 11:18 PM
 
Location: Mableton, GA USA (NW Atlanta suburb, 4 miles OTP)
11,334 posts, read 26,086,242 times
Reputation: 3995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oildog View Post
I think it was the high school team and they played no-checking and the Olympic team lost.
It was Warroad's high school team. They defeated the Olympians 2-1. Close game, tho.

Warroad High School edges Team USA women - Olympics - ESPN
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 09:50 AM
 
9,741 posts, read 11,161,033 times
Reputation: 8482
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcsteiner View Post
It was Warroad's high school team. They defeated the Olympians 2-1. Close game, tho.

Warroad High School edges Team USA women - Olympics - ESPN
Back in 2005-2006, Warroad's HS team was rated 142 (see United States Boys High School Hockey Rankings ). In other words, they were a decent team. If the Warroad team played the boys Holly Angles (ranked #2), then Warroad would have been mopped up. So in other words, the best of the best women's team cannot compete with a top rated boys high school team. If we add in checking to the mix, it would be a complete and utter blowout. I'm just say'in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis
2,526 posts, read 3,051,326 times
Reputation: 4343
From a basic physiological perspective, well-conditioned female athletes tend to plot-out at around the thirtieth to thirty-fifth percentile of male athletes. That is to say that that those women will tend to perform at about the same level as the lowest third of male athletes. Factor in the difference in maturity levels between women in their early to mid twenties--compared to eighteen and nineteen year old (and younger for those who have suggested a comparison to boys high school ball) men, and you have another important element of team competition.

Looking at some purely numerical comparisons in individual athletic endeavors, there is a higher level of performance from the best-conditioned of women than many expect. For example, if we combine the male and female finishers of the 2011 NY Marathon, we find that the best time for a woman ranks at twentieth overall--with six women among the top thirty spots. The top one hundred finishers included fifteen women. This means that there were fifteen women who finished with a faster time than 99.7 percent of the men who finished the race. If there's one thing a marathon measures, athletically speaking, it is endurance.

ING New York City Marathon Results Archive

If we look at the weightlifting results from the 2012 Olympics, the best weights recorded by female lifters tended to come in at about fifteenth to twentieth place when combined with the male lifters of similar weight classifications--which means that the best female lifters outperformed most male lifters.

No one is arguing that female athletes can compete with similarly-conditioned male athletes; but I would stand by the argument that well-conditioned individual female athletes have the ability to compete with some of the good--but not remarkable--male athletes and many male athletes of average ability. There's no reason that those individual abilities wouldn't translate into team sports.

While we are all entitled to an opinion on the matter, and it is unlikely that we will ever be provided with a real-life example (it wouldn't be in the PR interest of anyone to take such a risk), a lot of people are underestimating the advances in girl's/women's athletics (particularly basketball) over the last few decades.

As to the original question, I think a lot of people have been following the Lynx. Attendance has been up considerably, as have TV ratings. Good competition is good competition--regardless of the level at which it's played. We haven't had much in the way of competitive teams around here over the last few years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,922,581 times
Reputation: 16265
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcsteiner View Post
It was Warroad's high school team. They defeated the Olympians 2-1. Close game, tho.

Warroad High School edges Team USA women - Olympics - ESPN
I recall this story wasnt given much run as they didnt want to dampen enthusiasm for the womens team.

Now that the Lynx are knocked out, do they make lots of changes? I understand they had a good regular season.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,054,423 times
Reputation: 37337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oildog View Post
I recall this story wasnt given much run as they didnt want to dampen enthusiasm for the womens team.

Now that the Lynx are knocked out, do they make lots of changes? I understand they had a good regular season.
Lynx Big 3 had a pretty successful Olympics as well, they probably got worn down and their main stars have been playing a lot of basketball the past year or so. While the rest of the league has seen a general drop in attendance I think the Lynx saw a significant increase and IIRC they were over 9K/game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 11:36 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,747,294 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogead View Post
I've been to several games. I've literally just gotten home from watching them win at Target Center tonight. Attendance was well over 13,000. Women's/girl's basketball has improved considerably over the last decade or so. I would guess that a top WNBA team would be able to compete with a solid men's college team today. At any rate, the level of competition is growing better every year, and I hope the support The Lynx get will grow accordingly.
Pardon me for piling on if this is 3 pages of people explaining that the WNBA champion couldn't stay within 30 points of Kentucky, Duke, North Carolina or Michigan St. It's like in tennis. The 100th ranked mens player would smoke the women's champion. That's not to say that women's athletics aren't important or that they can't be entertaining, just a dose of reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2012, 07:25 AM
 
1,258 posts, read 2,446,953 times
Reputation: 1323
Well they are an endangered species in Minnesota but you don't hear much in the media about what the DNR is doing to help the population bounce back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top