U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alabama > Mobile area
 [Register]
Mobile area Mobile County
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2021, 08:52 PM
 
Location: Mobile, AL
470 posts, read 374,573 times
Reputation: 207

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PortCity View Post
That probably was the case then but he is not against annexations now. Fred and Karlos are two different people hands down.
Really, because Karlos is pretty clear about being against annexation on his website, Facebook, and speaking engagements. I honestly think that Karlos knows that annexation is best for the city; however, he feels for some reason he has to do what the Mobile Democratic Executive Committee says. They are the ones that put up the opposition as it was a goal of theirs to try to get rid of Sandy. They were pretty open about it in 2019. They were worried that West Mobile was too republican and make it difficult to get a democratic mayor. They put a TON of pressure on Manzie. What bothers me the most is that Karlos, Fred, and the others would put their political careers above the city. Shameful. Manzie is having trouble and a lot of it stems from his opposition to the annexation vote. If he truly is for annexation, why can't he say that he would push for a vote after taking office? After all, the city will need a lot more revenue for all of his proposed programs.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2021, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Mobile,Al(the city by the bay)
4,800 posts, read 8,329,466 times
Reputation: 1896
Quote:
Originally Posted by evlb401 View Post
Really, because Karlos is pretty clear about being against annexation on his website, Facebook, and speaking engagements. I honestly think that Karlos knows that annexation is best for the city; however, he feels for some reason he has to do what the Mobile Democratic Executive Committee says. They are the ones that put up the opposition as it was a goal of theirs to try to get rid of Sandy. They were pretty open about it in 2019. They were worried that West Mobile was too republican and make it difficult to get a democratic mayor. They put a TON of pressure on Manzie. What bothers me the most is that Karlos, Fred, and the others would put their political careers above the city. Shameful. Manzie is having trouble and a lot of it stems from his opposition to the annexation vote. If he truly is for annexation, why can't he say that he would push for a vote after taking office? After all, the city will need a lot more revenue for all of his proposed programs.
Why would manzie be against annexation? His district is in the heart of the city. Annexation wouldn't effect him I assume.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2021, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Mobile, AL
470 posts, read 374,573 times
Reputation: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by PortCity View Post
Why would manzie be against annexation? His district is in the heart of the city. Annexation wouldn't effect him I assume.
Exactly. He was going to be yes vote and that is one of the reasons the initiative was added to the agenda. The administration thought they had the votes after months of negotiations. The MCEC and the Alabama Democratic party put a high priority on Mobile's non-partisan mayoral election. They want to unseat Sandy who is a republican. They put pressure on Manzie to change his vote. If anything, it would have helped his district by increasing revenues in the city, which can improve the entire community.

When Vivian Figures, Sam Jones, Napoleon Bracy, Adaline Clarke and others showed up at the council meeting.... We all knew Manzie was going to cave. Those democratic politicians have a lot of power in the community. Mobile politics can be dirty, but putting your political party or ambitions above the welfare of your city is horrible.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2021, 09:51 AM
 
1,369 posts, read 1,589,520 times
Reputation: 655
It's too bad the racial component even got entered into the conversation about allowing people to vote to annex in the first place... absolutely a shameful moment for Fred Richardson and whomever is pushing that behind the scenes. Truly disgraceful

I know I personally lost a lot of respect for Manzie for falling to that pressure
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2021, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Mobile,Al(the city by the bay)
4,800 posts, read 8,329,466 times
Reputation: 1896
Quote:
Originally Posted by evlb401 View Post
Exactly. He was going to be yes vote and that is one of the reasons the initiative was added to the agenda. The administration thought they had the votes after months of negotiations. The MCEC and the Alabama Democratic party put a high priority on Mobile's non-partisan mayoral election. They want to unseat Sandy who is a republican. They put pressure on Manzie to change his vote. If anything, it would have helped his district by increasing revenues in the city, which can improve the entire community.

When Vivian Figures, Sam Jones, Napoleon Bracy, Adaline Clarke and others showed up at the council meeting.... We all knew Manzie was going to cave. Those democratic politicians have a lot of power in the community. Mobile politics can be dirty, but putting your political party or ambitions above the welfare of your city is horrible.
Wow smh.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2021, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Madison, Alabama
10,486 posts, read 6,549,065 times
Reputation: 7211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southsky View Post
It's too bad the racial component even got entered into the conversation about allowing people to vote to annex in the first place... absolutely a shameful moment for Fred Richardson and whomever is pushing that behind the scenes. Truly disgraceful

I know I personally lost a lot of respect for Manzie for falling to that pressure
Unfortunately, it's that way nationwide nowadays. And perhaps even worse, it's widely accepted as fair.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alabama > Mobile area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top