Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-26-2006, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Great Falls, Montana
529 posts, read 1,892,729 times
Reputation: 250

Advertisements

There is an old story about Montana that gets told every now and again about how Missoula, Kalispell and all points west of the great divide were supposed to be located in Idaho.

The debate goes back and forth, even to this day. (more folks need to visit the library of Congress)

Anyhow, the story goes like this......

Way back in the mid 1800's, government survey crews were sent out to survey parts of the Dakota territory, and parts of the Idaho territory, in order to create the Montana territory.

During the course of the survey, government crews presumably got lost or just forgot where they were and surveyed the wrong mountain range, thus giving the Montana territory much more of the Idaho territory than they were supposed to.

After many years of wondering about this, I decided to pay a visit to the library of Congress just to see for myself.

Well, it appears, from the records at the library of Congress, that our government survey crews did indeed goof up somewhere, because Congress had made it very clear that the long/lat and the Rocky mountain range (continental divide) was to be followed.

Instead, the Bitterroot range was followed, thus creating the Montana territory, and eventually, the 4th largest state by land mass in the union.

More folks in the late 1800's knew about this blunder than most do now however, and in our state constitution (1884, 1889), it is very well spelled out that "the state" be created using the "same boundaries" that the territory was created with. They had a choice... to follow the blunder, or to follow the long/lat that Congress prescribed originally..... Our state chose to stay with the blunder.
Thus, putting cities like Missoula, Kalispell, Libby, Hamilton and others, forever within the state boundary of Montana.

And to think........ If the Fed were paying attention (when do they ever??), points west of the continental divide could easily be in Idaho today, and not Montana.

(src= 38th Congress *session 1 May 26 1864)

note: the state constitution of 1884 was ratified but never approved by congress
the state constitution of 1889 was both ratified and approved by congress

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2006, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Golden Valley AZ
777 posts, read 3,197,650 times
Reputation: 284
Thanks, that is really neat info
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2009, 07:00 PM
 
1 posts, read 8,363 times
Reputation: 10
Thats Great info!!! =) I was born in Great Falls MT, and lived there 12 yrs. and i NEVER knew that. Thanks! :-D
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2009, 08:59 PM
 
38 posts, read 122,911 times
Reputation: 35
Edgerton, Montana's first governor, succeeded in enlarging Montana. Idaho never saw it coming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2009, 10:38 PM
 
19 posts, read 38,894 times
Reputation: 25
Based on the shape of Idaho, this story makes perfect sense...

Todd
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2009, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,088 posts, read 15,162,403 times
Reputation: 3740
Tho one might express regret at the outcome, depending on one's view of Missoula

Anyone have the full version of "A Tabloid History of Montana"?? Part one is here: http://www.mdt.mt.gov/photogallery/d...id_history.pdf
For some reason the subsequent parts never got posted, or maybe they don't exist??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2009, 08:00 AM
 
Location: a Montana state of mind...
271 posts, read 460,339 times
Reputation: 453
Great story! Thanks for sharing!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2009, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,088 posts, read 15,162,403 times
Reputation: 3740
Default Modern Myths

This is the story of AQHA, who came riding out of the blizzard, on his camel, uphill both ways... did anyone mention why cowboys don't ride camels?? It's because when you get to the top of the mountain, you can't get back down!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 02:02 AM
 
152 posts, read 330,953 times
Reputation: 108
Could you imagine traveling from Kalispell to your state capital in Boise! I have a feeling the representation would not be so good.

If Oregon hadn't been a state for 30 years by the time of the formation of Montana, Idaho, and Washington, it would have been quite logical to have made an additional state that encompassed NW Washington, North Idaho, and Western Montana, and give Idaho a good portion of the East part Oregon.

It really is too bad that we can't force Western Washington and Western Oregon into a single state and still add another state or two East of the Cascades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,088 posts, read 15,162,403 times
Reputation: 3740
Quote:
Originally Posted by nature's cathedral View Post
Could you imagine traveling from Kalispell to your state capital in Boise! I have a feeling the representation would not be so good.
No worse than travelling from Miles City or Wolf Point to Helena

Or from Montana to Washington D.C.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top