Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2011, 09:13 PM
 
5,341 posts, read 14,132,802 times
Reputation: 4699

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDish2000 View Post
I ask due to being a "seasoned" previous homeowner that is currently renting (relocated to new state 2 years ago).

I recall the last two home purchases (as an employee of a company) using gross earnings...
When you are a W-2 employee it is the gross that is used.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2011, 06:24 PM
 
467 posts, read 1,495,930 times
Reputation: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDish2000 View Post
I am an LLC that hires about 2 subcontractors and has various other business expenses...

If my tax return reflects "lower adjusted income" after business items/expenses I can write-off, how can I obtain a mortgage? In other words, I have plenty of "gross" or "pre-tax" earnings; however, would a bank hold this against me when applying for a USDA/FHA loan?

Trademarked, do you have the answer?
You're in the exact same situation as me. I wish I had an answer... I'm trying to find a portfolio lender that recognizes a low ltv, strong credit score, and great cash reserves make up for verifiable income.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimtheGuy View Post
Yes, a lender is only going to consider your bottom line. We do get to add back depreciation since those expenses do not impact your cash flow. It makes sense if you think about it. If you really have all these expenses that come off the gross how would those funds be available to make loan payments. Gross means nothing.
Everyone else that qualifies (W2) gets to use their gross. Lenders have never used net. I'm not saying you're incorrect, just that it's unfortunate for those of us who are self employed, as we are held to a different standard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2011, 07:43 AM
 
5,341 posts, read 14,132,802 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trademarked View Post
You're in the exact same situation as me. I wish I had an answer... I'm trying to find a portfolio lender that recognizes a low ltv, strong credit score, and great cash reserves make up for verifiable income.



Everyone else that qualifies (W2) gets to use their gross. Lenders have never used net. I'm not saying you're incorrect, just that it's unfortunate for those of us who are self employed, as we are held to a different standard.
Apples to oranges.

Example of S/E borrower:

$600,000 gross
(300,000) less materials
(100,000) less salaries
(150,000) less all the other expenses of running the business
$50,000 net income

A lender should use the $600k gross for qualifying? Of course not. The W-2 person does not incur those income reducing expenses. Same standard in my book.

Of course the lenders hear, "well I really make more than it shows on paper". Not only does this make the S/E person a tax cheat, how is the lender supposed to prove what is not documented and why would they want to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2011, 09:15 AM
 
467 posts, read 1,495,930 times
Reputation: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimtheGuy View Post
Apples to oranges.

Example of S/E borrower:

$600,000 gross
(300,000) less materials
(100,000) less salaries
(150,000) less all the other expenses of running the business
$50,000 net income

A lender should use the $600k gross for qualifying? Of course not. The W-2 person does not incur those income reducing expenses. Same standard in my book.

Of course the lenders hear, "well I really make more than it shows on paper". Not only does this make the S/E person a tax cheat, how is the lender supposed to prove what is not documented and why would they want to?
Not everyone's situation looks like this. I have deductions that are not real expenses that leave my wallet. I have substantial real estate depreciation and mileage on my car. I also am able to have the business pay for things like business lunches, an unlimited minutes phone plan, and internet access. W2 people don't have food, telephones, and internet come out of their gross income for qualifying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2011, 09:39 AM
 
5,341 posts, read 14,132,802 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trademarked View Post
Not everyone's situation looks like this. I have deductions that are not real expenses that leave my wallet. I have substantial real estate depreciation and mileage on my car. I also am able to have the business pay for things like business lunches, an unlimited minutes phone plan, and internet access. W2 people don't have food, telephones, and internet come out of their gross income for qualifying.
Depreciation is added back to your bottom line. Pretty sure their is cash leaving your wallet or the businesses wallet for phone, internet, business lunches, etc. W-2 people typically don't have to drive around for work, don't pay for their own internet at their workplace, don't use a cell phone for business or pay for business lunches. Those that do file this on Schdule A under unreimbursed business expenses. And guess what, we deduct that from the gross for qualifying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2011, 05:07 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
19,429 posts, read 27,804,420 times
Reputation: 36092
TimTheGuy - you should be TimTheMan. Two great posts! ++++++++++++
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 08:32 PM
 
2,281 posts, read 1,580,488 times
Reputation: 3858
To answer the 1st question, Yes they still exists and only a few lenders (or your small local bank non-big name bank; hint this takes out the middle man. Now you win as the banks have won a lot already..free money bailouts. ) OK, I am getting sidetracked. They will have it if anyone does. Also, when I did a search and AFAIK, your best bets to get a stated income loan are in CA, WA, NY, NJ & CT.
I actually talked to a broker because who in their right mind would not be looking to buy at 3.5% to 4% interest and lower prices. I know it could go lower though". It ain;t Vegas and look what happened there. By Golly Gee Whiz!! If it is cheaper than rent, why the heck not. (Open hand hitting forehead), , seriously, it seems to be a no-brainer if you can qualify. Wall street may have screwed up the housing market for a while but isn't there usually always a good time to buy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top