U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-27-2011, 10:35 PM
 
1,821 posts, read 7,517,938 times
Reputation: 1044

Advertisements

I have about 27 years and $132k left on my mortgage with Wells Fargo. My current interest rate is 4.685%. Today I called the company about something else, and they offered to do a no-cost refi with 3 options:

-- 30 years at 3.85%, which would decrease my monthly obligation by $91

-- 20 years at 3.75%, which would increase my monthly obligation about about $80

-- 15 years at 3.25%, which would increase my monthly obligation by about $200.

Note that I already pay about $50 a month above my required payment. So the 20-year option would only require me to pay about $30 more than I pay now. The 30-year option would allow me to apply an extra $140 toward principle each month without increasing my monthly paymen. I don't really want to increase my required payment by $200, so I don't think I want to do the 15-year option.

So I am left wondering:

1) Why would they make such an offer?

2) Are there any downsides to refinancing at no cost, especially at the 30 or 20-year terms?

3) Which of the above scenarios makes the most sense?

Are the rates decent for a no-cost refi? I'm not really interested in spending a lot of money on closing costs because my loan amount is relatively small and I already have a decent rate.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2011, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Mount Laurel
4,187 posts, read 11,320,890 times
Reputation: 3509
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolcats View Post
I have about 27 years and $132k left on my mortgage with Wells Fargo. My current interest rate is 4.685%. Today I called the company about something else, and they offered to do a no-cost refi with 3 options:

-- 30 years at 3.85%, which would decrease my monthly obligation by $91

-- 20 years at 3.75%, which would increase my monthly obligation about about $80

-- 15 years at 3.25%, which would increase my monthly obligation by about $200.

Note that I already pay about $50 a month above my required payment. So the 20-year option would only require me to pay about $30 more than I pay now. The 30-year option would allow me to apply an extra $140 toward principle each month without increasing my monthly paymen. I don't really want to increase my required payment by $200, so I don't think I want to do the 15-year option.

So I am left wondering:

1) Why would they make such an offer?

2) Are there any downsides to refinancing at no cost, especially at the 30 or 20-year terms?

3) Which of the above scenarios makes the most sense?

Are the rates decent for a no-cost refi? I'm not really interested in spending a lot of money on closing costs because my loan amount is relatively small and I already have a decent rate.
Anytime you are offered a no-cost refi for lower rate, you take. As long as

1. It's truely no cost and not rolled into the new loan.
2. You understand and new terms and that there are no catch.
3. You have enough equity.

In your case, I would go for the 30years if you want to be "safe" but note that your loan will reset back to 30 years. If you are comfortable doing the extra $50 already for the last 3 years, then converting to a 20years may make more sense.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 08:41 AM
 
28,460 posts, read 81,622,242 times
Reputation: 18676
The paltry discount of one tenth of a percent on interest is hardly enough incmetice to choose 20 years over 30. Even the six tenths discounts for 15 years is pretty measly. The flexibility you have by either deciding to pay down your mortgage with additional principal payments vs having to cough up another $2400/yr would generally lead me to suggest the 30 yr term. I suppose if you are the type to spend any extra cash instead of investing or perhaps is already sitting on top of a massive mound of retirement savings I could see going with a 15 year term, but only if you have some highly stable employment situation AND the likelihood of your property appreciating faster than average is high -- essentially your valuation increase should be thought of in terms of the likely rise of alternate investments for the portion of the payment that you are diverting to accelerated equity...
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 10:33 AM
 
4,196 posts, read 5,999,823 times
Reputation: 2834
Take the 15 year option!
it's just 150 more than what you're paying now, and if you can afford it, it'll save you THOUSANDS!!!!! (about 20k-30k at least)
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 02:50 AM
 
39 posts, read 67,844 times
Reputation: 39
Take the 30 year loan...but commit to paying it like a 15 year loan. It would turn the 30 year into about a 19 year loan...but if you hit hard times it gives you the ability to "pay less"
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Plano, Texas
1,675 posts, read 6,834,331 times
Reputation: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by do_not_have_a_cow View Post
Take the 30 year loan...but commit to paying it like a 15 year loan. It would turn the 30 year into about a 19 year loan...but if you hit hard times it gives you the ability to "pay less"

I totally agree. the only homeowners that should consider a term of less than 30 years should have 2 things met first. No debt other than the mortgage and a liquid emergency fund of 6 months living expenses.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:50 PM
 
Location: New York
2,251 posts, read 4,752,422 times
Reputation: 1617
Quote:
Originally Posted by do_not_have_a_cow View Post
Take the 30 year loan...but commit to paying it like a 15 year loan. It would turn the 30 year into about a 19 year loan...but if you hit hard times it gives you the ability to "pay less"

Here's a link for some excel spread sheets, you plug in the numbers. (Note the numbers do not reflect your escrows.)

Spreadsheets - The Mortgage Professor

Currently loan paying $709.83 + $50 = $759.83

A new 20 yr loan = payment $782.61 - Knocks off 7 years.

The 20yr is your best option.




..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top