Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-30-2009, 01:30 AM
 
1 posts, read 2,913 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

I got an FHA loan because I was led to believe that I could get rid of my PMI (or maybe its MIP) insurance once my loan to value ratio was 78%.

I contacted my bank and they said that you have to have the insurance for a minimum of 5 years, regardless of your LTV ratio if you have an FHA loan. Im wasting thousands of dollars on this, its crazy.

I have a $110,000 loan @ 5.0% (just bought a house a few months ago) and im spending 60 dollars a month on this insurance

would it make since to refinance to a conventional mortgage if i could get a similar rate, or would the closing costs be too high?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2009, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Plano, Texas
1,673 posts, read 7,016,839 times
Reputation: 697
Your closing costs would be to much for it to make sense. Plus, if you go conventional you will have higher monthly PMI, or you will have to get a 2nd lien. I am assuming you put down very little money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 02:24 AM
 
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen)
180 posts, read 694,229 times
Reputation: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorBurek View Post
Your closing costs would be to much for it to make sense. Plus, if you go conventional you will have higher monthly PMI, or you will have to get a 2nd lien. I am assuming you put down very little money.
lol a 2nd? good luck.

he said that he thought he could cancel it at 78%, so I'm assuming he has the ability to get the loan down to under 80% for conventional.

5% should be no points and probably something like $2,500 in fees.

would take you 3.5 years to make it up in savings.

probably worth it if you are in for the long haul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 05:02 AM
 
Location: Wake Forest, NC
835 posts, read 3,977,249 times
Reputation: 650
Another advantage is that FHA is almost always assumable- I won't say always without reading the note. When rates are up in future years, say at 6-7%, you will have a 5% assumable rate to enhance your property when it goes on the market. Assumability is going to be a selling tool in the future for people who have these low rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top