Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie
Actually I did a reverse amortization for 45k in interest alone and it meant the seller would have to sell more than just 45k in loss... so actually if you talk about the interest in principal (at 5% interest) over 30 years, it would take MORE than 45k principal to get 45k in interest alone... looking at typical savings interest rates hovering around 1-2%, it would take even more principal... so actually, I was being very kind to say only 45k loss to the seller...
|
Still oversimplified to the point of inapplicable.
1. Few people amortize over the 30 years you need for your example. I am on my 7th home loan, and nowhere near 200 years old.
2. It seems that you are mingling cash with leverage to make your point. If I reduce my price $45,000, and that saves the buyer interest, how does it follow that the buyer can put $45000 he doesn't have (would have leveraged and paid interest on) to work in the bank?
If a buyer borrows $200,000 @ 6% for 30 years, he will pay back about $432,000.
If he borrows $180,000 @ 6% and pays for 30 years, he will pay back about $388,800.
At 20% down, the price is $250,000 in the first example and $225,000 in the second example. The $25,000 price reduction yields a $43,200 savings to the Buyer over the 30 years.