Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-02-2014, 11:26 PM
 
1,997 posts, read 1,630,680 times
Reputation: 2818

Advertisements

read somewhere that the latest keanu reeves movie 47 Ronin cost some $200M!! Is is me or are hollywood budgets out of control.to rub salt into the wound even more, the reviews are very bad and the movie barely has made even 10% of it budget back, I'm assuming the budget doesnt include the amount of money spent on advertising.In fact some of the biggest flops in hollywood actually made a great deal of money but their budgets were so astronomical that there was no way they could have broken even.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2014, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Maine
22,846 posts, read 28,091,495 times
Reputation: 31028
Over budget doesn't always mean a bust. Both JAWS and TITANIC went waaaaaay over budget and over schedule, and both turned out to be two of the most successful movies ever made.

47 Ronin didn't flop because it went over budget. It flopped because it was a bad movie.

Some times a great movie (like JAWS) needs more money and time to get it over the finish line. But if the movie is bad from the script onward, no amount of money is going to save it. More work and effort can make a jewel shine. But no amount of polishing a turd is ever going to give you anything other than a polished turd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2014, 05:00 PM
 
15,488 posts, read 15,468,958 times
Reputation: 21791
Budgets have been considered out of control for years. Or decades. But you can see even in this forum, that the bulk of the posts are about big mainstream Hollywood movies - Smaug, Wolf of Wall Street, Anchorman 2.

Until the public - and people in this forum - start turning to smaller, more intimate, cheaper films, studios will continued to pump money into bloated extravaganzas. For instance, I really liked the movie "In a World," but I don't see bunches of people here who went to see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top