Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Im not sure how I feel about this. The 87 movie was just a classic.
well... I think the original was a HORRIBLE movie that is extremely overrated. therefore, IMO, the remake cant possibly be worse than the original, and would most likely be at least a marginally more watchable film. however, since it seems a majority of people, for reasons beyond my understanding, see the original movie as "a classic" or otherwise good somehow, it probably wont be very successful as it will never live up to the original.
Toronto was very happy to be the place where Robocop was filmed. A 200 million dollar budget all spent here, and over 3,000 crew and support jobs, for a 10 month shooting schedule. Thanks.
I'll have to agree with the majority here. The original was pretty bad, although it seems to have some fans, but it really wasn't a great movie. Why would you bother to remake it? My predicition is that the sequel will have somewhat better special effects and a bad storyline and even worse acting.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
