Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-17-2017, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Glasgow Scotland
18,528 posts, read 18,752,718 times
Reputation: 28773

Advertisements

Marvellous film with Jimmy Stewart and Kim Novak... If you havent seen it theres a hotel room scene, where the room is bathed in green neon light from a sign outside the hotel window.. done well by Hitchcock and how a artist did this piece of work from the film.. and it sits on a small drab lane in Glasgow.. "Empire Sign" and Mitre Bar sign,... (C) Barbara Carr :: Geograph Britain and Ireland
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2017, 03:03 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,728 posts, read 26,812,827 times
Reputation: 24790
A classic. One of Alfred Hitchcock's best films.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2017, 03:55 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,142,059 times
Reputation: 8224
Many people consider it his best, but I'm one of the few people who doesn't much like it. To me, it's second-rate, too stiff, too artificial, too contrived. I consider it second-tier, not as good as Notorious, for instance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2017, 12:27 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
14,784 posts, read 24,086,869 times
Reputation: 27092
it happened to be one of my dads faves . Dad has been gone a while but he sure had a thing for kim novak .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2017, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,365,741 times
Reputation: 23858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Many people consider it his best, but I'm one of the few people who doesn't much like it. To me, it's second-rate, too stiff, too artificial, too contrived. I consider it second-tier, not as good as Notorious, for instance.
Me, too. It was a disturbing movie, but not a thriller.
I think Rear Window, North by Northwest, and Psycho were all better.

I think part of the failure was due to casting Jimmy Stewart. Stewart had a lot of range as an actor, but he just didn't fit the part of a sexually obsessed guy with head problems. He had too much reputation as a good-guy hero. He was perfect in Rear Window, though.

Vertigo didn't do well at the box office. In fact, it lost so much money that Psycho happened because it could be made on a very limited budget. After Vertigo, Universal wasn't willing to bankroll Hitchcock any more, but Paramount was willing to give him a shot as long as it didn't cost them much.

After Psycho, Universal was very willing to drop some serious money on 'The Birds"- that was one of Hitchcock's most expensive flicks, due to the use of extensive special effects. And several thousand live birds. The Birds was never one of my faves either, but it was better than Vertigo. And made a lot more money.

Interestingly, the next to follow The Birds was "Marnie", which really resembled Vertigo, but was even more twisted, and was his largest flop. Hitch loved to indulge his own kinks in a few of his movies, but they never paid off very well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 08:08 AM
BMI
 
Location: Ontario
7,454 posts, read 7,273,729 times
Reputation: 6126
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
Me, too. It was a disturbing movie, but not a thriller.
I think Rear Window, North by Northwest, and Psycho were all better.

I think part of the failure was due to casting Jimmy Stewart. Stewart had a lot of range as an actor, but he just didn't fit the part of a sexually obsessed guy with head problems. He had too much reputation as a good-guy hero. He was perfect in Rear Window, though.

Vertigo didn't do well at the box office. In fact, it lost so much money that Psycho happened because it could be made on a very limited budget. After Vertigo, Universal wasn't willing to bankroll Hitchcock any more, but Paramount was willing to give him a shot as long as it didn't cost them much.

After Psycho, Universal was very willing to drop some serious money on 'The Birds"- that was one of Hitchcock's most expensive flicks, due to the use of extensive special effects. And several thousand live birds. The Birds was never one of my faves either, but it was better than Vertigo. And made a lot more money.

Interestingly, the next to follow The Birds was "Marnie", which really resembled Vertigo, but was even more twisted, and was his largest flop. Hitch loved to indulge his own kinks in a few of his movies, but they never paid off very well.
Interesting. But wasn't North by Northwest between Vertigo and Psycho?
North By Northwest had a big budget.

Vertigo (1958)
North By Northwest (1959)
Psycho (1960)

I like Vertigo but it is not my fave Hitchcock film.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top