Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-03-2019, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,699 posts, read 67,770,976 times
Reputation: 21282

Advertisements

Good.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2019, 04:47 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,920,217 times
Reputation: 3268
Good move on the DOJs part. A good movie is a good movie regardless if you bring in marvel like crowds. LA media companies fighting each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Carmichael, CA
2,420 posts, read 4,489,353 times
Reputation: 4395
Why in the world would the DOJ be involved in an awards show?

Next they'll be turning it over to the FBI if the "right" people don't win awards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 05:35 PM
 
28,722 posts, read 18,947,211 times
Reputation: 31037
I'm not seeing the validity of the DOJ's interpretation of "anti-competitive."

And it would be pretty hard to prove that not having been considered for an Oscar caused any financial damage to a Netflix movie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 05:54 PM
 
16,447 posts, read 12,638,016 times
Reputation: 59784
I agree with Spielberg, to be honest. I think to be eligible for the Oscars, a film should be intended and released for theatrical large format viewing. In the case of Roma, it was originally intended for theatrical viewing. Netflix got the distribution rights post-production (or pretty close to post-production), and did the bare minimum limited release for it to be Oscar eligible.

But for the most part, Netflix, Hulu, etc. films belong with the Emmys. Since the majority of the viewing will be on televisions (or television sized displays), it belongs with the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 10:00 PM
 
Location: South Australia
372 posts, read 222,741 times
Reputation: 948
Of course the academy awards are already a hallmark of excellence.

--And it has been getting even better in recent years.

Netflix may/may not be included? Who cares? Not this little black duck.

The phrase 'ineffably corrupt' just popped into my head.I don't know why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2019, 06:14 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,883 posts, read 27,080,041 times
Reputation: 25018
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
I agree with Spielberg, to be honest. I think to be eligible for the Oscars, a film should be intended and released for theatrical large format viewing.

But for the most part, Netflix, Hulu, etc. films belong with the Emmys.
I do as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 04:40 PM
 
23,667 posts, read 70,774,022 times
Reputation: 49483
^^^ As do I. Netflix has set out to be hostile to distribution to theatres. You can't put mayo and roast beef between to pieces of cardboard, call it a book, and enter it into a literary competition. Netflix has big boy panties. It can play by the rules or suck it up. I personally know of an attempt by a theatre company to get Netflix to allow a booking of one of its films, and how that attempt was rebuffed. Maybe I'll put training wheels on a scooter and with it having four wheels, enter it in an automobile design competition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 04:52 PM
Status: "TRUMP 2024." (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Florida
10,660 posts, read 4,156,442 times
Reputation: 8664
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb73 View Post
Why in the world would the DOJ be involved in an awards show?

Next they'll be turning it over to the FBI if the "right" people don't win awards.
Good question. They are more or less, private affairs and should be treated as such. It's definitely not a matter for tax payer public officials to worry about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,753 posts, read 14,903,380 times
Reputation: 35592
LOL What a crock of baloney.

Notwithstanding the fact that the "Oscar effect" is ever-waning (this year's broadcast was second-lowest in viewership), making it hard to argue that exclusion negatively impacts anyone, this is simply more government meddling.

So the DOJ wants to stick its beak into the criteria for films to be considered for nomination--something solely within the purview of The Academy.

Some things never change
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top